Originally posted by Race Car Driver
HTG official High Definition high octane DVD format war, the aftermath
Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
-
CHRIS
Well, we're safe for now. Thank goodness we're in a bowling alley.
- Pleasantville- Bottom
-
Originally posted by Chris DWow, did that really happen? I haven't seen that in news anywhere. If you have a link to official information about it, that would be interesting to read!!!
It also says that Toshiba was very surprised by the move because they were in contract negotiations with Warner & Fox to go HD-DVD exclusive as recent as a week ago. I guess $500 million is a good way to negotiate too-Chuck- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by Chris DAre you sure about that? They may not give you the 5 free movies at time of purchase, but you can get the 5 free movies by mail-in with purchase of a PS3. I'm doing that right now.
Ps3 excluded
Oh well, I will have a PS3 within the next month I believe.B&W- Bottom
Comment
-
Ok, I lied, I wont be getting a PS3 within the next month..
I bought one tonight All the local best buys (20+) are down the thier last 5 or less of the 80 gig with free motostorm and there are none in the wharehouses.
Im thinking the free game is ending or they may be putting a different game in it soon.B&W- Bottom
Comment
-
Funny, now that this 'format war' seems to be coming to a conclusion, I'm sure it will rapidly spell the end for 5 free disk deals and whatnot...
For continuity to this thread, here's the link I posted in that other thread wrt Paramount and their 'get out of jail free' card.....
Vincent.
I don't want the world. I just want your half.- Bottom
Comment
-
There was an official statement from paramount on engadget saying that they do not plan to jump ship from HD-DVD just yet and that it was all rumors. There are some bad things to the format war being over you know? Player prices will slow down in decline a lot and the discs will probably stay the same price for a very long time. Competition is always best for consumers.- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dougie085Competition is always best for consumers.B&W- Bottom
Comment
-
Yes, Paramount is sticking with HD-DVD. Although this may be a big swing, the format war hasn't quite ended yet.
There's been a big jump in PS3 sales lately. And for all of those HD-DVD fans who claim that none of the PS3 owners use it to watch Blu-Rays, (and therefore don't count) Sony just did a new study, 87% of PS3 owners use them for BD.
CHRIS
Well, we're safe for now. Thank goodness we're in a bowling alley.
- Pleasantville- Bottom
Comment
-
I never said they don't use it for blu ray I stated that it is a gaming console . Also i bet the reasons that its 87% now is for a few reasons. Free BD's by mail and the fact the new 40gb one comes with a free blu ray movie. There for they can count just about everyone they sell as them using it. My real problem right now with Sony is that they need to set a standard.... I was just talking to my friend about players last night and he was saying the Samsung BD-P1400 took almost 5 min to load a java bd. This is just crazy... In the end though I would be happier if Blu Ray won. And if anyone is going to win I'm sure its going to be them... If not it will be a combo player future but at this point that is looking unlikely.- Bottom
Comment
-
Microsoft says they'd definitely consider doing a blu-ray addon for the 360 if that's the way the market went.
-Chuck- Bottom
Comment
-
Dougie, you're right, I take any study with a grain of salt that is done by the owning corporation. But I think Sony is making an intelligent move by offering free Blu-Ray movies with the PS3. The biggest thing that I myself run into, time and time again when trying to educate the public, is that they just don't know what's POSSIBLE with fine audio and video. Why would someone spend good money for a $1500 receiver, unless they know what it can do for them? But once you show the public what high-def really can do, in a good setup, it makes it all worthwhile. What I don't understand is that my first PS3 (which got stolen) came with a rather poor quality BD of Talledega Nights. Geez, if you're going to try to show the public what high-def can do for you, I'd think you'd want to put on a better show than that.
other stuff...
Actually, Paramount has come out and officially stated that they are choosing to stay with HD-DVD for now. Hmmm... lemme see if I can find an official link. Now, on the other hand, there are some rumors that Universal may go to BD-only now. However, there is NO official information on that. Just that Universal decided not to declare anything at CES.
Universal Studios have announced that they will not be making any HD DVD title announcements at CES 2008. This goes …
Other news here, on the topic, let's see...
Just because Warner went to BD doesn't mean that their subsidiaries have to, apparently. But yes, HBO and New Line have now come out and said that they are going to BD as well. Apparently, Lord of the Rings is already in the works. I don't care, LOTR would be AWESOME on ANY high-def format!
CHRIS
Well, we're safe for now. Thank goodness we're in a bowling alley.
- Pleasantville- Bottom
Comment
-
I snagged a Samsung BD-P1000 today. It was on clearance/open box. It still qualified for the buy any BR player and get 5 free discs instantly in the store.
So for $213 out the door I got
BD-P1000
Cars
Pans Labrinth
Live Free or Die Hard
Blade Runner
Pirates at world end.
I think the player will go on ebay
I asked the sales people what was more popular, they said since the WB info, BR has been flying off the shelves.
Needless to say, the employee that rung me up was suprised and bummed she didnt know about that player being so cheap. :lol:B&W- Bottom
Comment
-
Hey, good find! On that note too, though, it'll be interesting to see what happens with HD-DVD hardware and software. I wonder if there will be some good sales, where we can pick up stuff for good prices. The war's certainly not to that point yet, though.CHRIS
Well, we're safe for now. Thank goodness we're in a bowling alley.
- Pleasantville- Bottom
Comment
-
I still prefer HD-DVD since adding a PS3 to the mix, but looking at the announcements at CES, I think Blu-ray is finally coming along feature wise. The PS3 doesn't really "fit" into my HT setup, so I'll probably be picking up a profile 2.0 BD player this summer. The Panny BP50 looks like the first BD player to be on-par with my XA2, but its coming in with a bit of a high MSRP. That's my biggest complaint with the BDA is they are selling profile 2.0 players at a premium when really, these are features (internal decoders, secondary decoders, ethernet, persistent memory) that should have been there from the start like HD-DVD.Santino
The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing.- Bottom
Comment
-
New sales
In the wake of the very Blu CES, Toshiba is slashing prices. The MSRP for the A3 is now $149.99, the A30 is $199.99 and the A35 is $299.99.
Also, at Amazon, all HD-DVDs are 30% off, plus up to 50% off on select titles for each format.
Blu-ray 50%
HD-DVD 50%Santino
The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing.- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by littlesaintIn the wake of the very Blu CES, Toshiba is slashing prices. The MSRP for the A3 is now $149.99, the A30 is $199.99 and the A35 is $299.99.- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by George BellefontaineHmmm, I wonder if Toshiba is trying to clear out the warehouse for some reason or other...Santino
The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing.- Bottom
Comment
-
Huh... seems like a smart move on Toshiba's part. (all except for the fact that my cost for the A35 was based on the old price.... okay, so I got $100 or so off of it, too, but now that makes it seem like I paid full retail price)
I also saw that BD is really kicking it in, too. Something like 250 BD titles on sale up to 60% off, at Amazon.CHRIS
Well, we're safe for now. Thank goodness we're in a bowling alley.
- Pleasantville- Bottom
Comment
-
Ive been in best buy alot the last few days, (about to head back before work) the BD movies shelves were a bit picked through, the players were non existant (they all said last week the flew off the shelves) Every time I was in there I saw atleast one person buying a BD player.
HDDVD was plentiful all the way around.B&W- Bottom
Comment
-
I think the biggest obstacle for HD optical formats is the adoption rate is not moving fast enough versus technology. Some of this could be blamed on the "war", but the bigger issue is DVD saturation, and a lack of HDTV saturation. Last year only $300M was made in HD formats, and player sales only accounted for 3% of all optical video player sales (more than half of that was the PS3). With new distribution services rolling out, by the time there is enough HDTV saturation, HD optical formats will be competing with the existing DVD consumer market (most if whom do not see enough "wow" factor to upgrade), and a new direct distribution market. At MacWorld, Apple announced the next iteration of AppleTV that increases quality to 720p and DD 5.1 for many titles. XboxLive already had has many 720p titles available. Neither of these services are equal to optical quality, nor are they perfect services in general, but this is just the start and HD optical doesn't have that big of a lead. What's more telling is Apple has distribution deals with every studio (including Sony). Something the optical formats are still "working out".Santino
The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing.- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by littlesaintI think the biggest obstacle for HD optical formats is the adoption rate is not moving fast enough versus technology. Some of this could be blamed on the "war", but the bigger issue is DVD saturation, and a lack of HDTV saturation. Last year only $300M was made in HD formats, and player sales only accounted for 3% of all optical video player sales (more than half of that was the PS3). With new distribution services rolling out, by the time there is enough HDTV saturation, HD optical formats will be competing with the existing DVD consumer market (most if whom do not see enough "wow" factor to upgrade), and a new direct distribution market. At MacWorld, Apple announced the next iteration of AppleTV that increases quality to 720p and DD 5.1 for many titles. XboxLive already had has many 720p titles available. Neither of these services are equal to optical quality, nor are they perfect services in general, but this is just the start and HD optical doesn't have that big of a lead. What's more telling is Apple has distribution deals with every studio (including Sony). Something the optical formats are still "working out".Jason- Bottom
Comment
-
Along the same lines, DVD prices are way down. You can go grab some old favorites for less then $10 each. New releases, where I am, anyway, are as little as $16.99.
HD Movies do not offer this sort of value. The HD experience vs. the Standard Def experience needs to be an intense improvement before I willingly spend double the money on a typical movie. I imagine that there are a lot of others in the same boat.- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by bmowisHD Movies do not offer this sort of value. The HD experience vs. the Standard Def experience needs to be an intense improvement before I willingly spend double the money on a typical movie....
I suppose it has alot to do with the remainder of the system also, not just the player.B&W- Bottom
Comment
-
I agree. I support both formats (though I mostly rent through Netflix) and will continue to do so until something better (either in quality or convenience) comes along. However, given the current economic leap required for HD formats, and given the direction the audio market went, I can see why many people don't see the necessity. How many people out there own 50"+ displays and HDMI capable AVRs? How many people already have DVD tech, and have it throughout their homes, cars, and portables? The leap from VHS to DVD was pretty simple. Not so for HD formats. That's not to say either format won't survive (and probably better than SACD or DVD-A did), I just don't think it will be market dominance like CDs, VHS, or DVD.Santino
The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing.- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by bmowisAlong the same lines, DVD prices are way down. You can go grab some old favorites for less then $10 each. New releases, where I am, anyway, are as little as $16.99.
HD Movies do not offer this sort of value. The HD experience vs. the Standard Def experience needs to be an intense improvement before I willingly spend double the money on a typical movie. I imagine that there are a lot of others in the same boat.- Bottom
Comment
-
Yea I just watched Live Free or Die Har on BD last night :T
High Def Media is soooo much better. I am glad I havent bought many DVDs over the last year...
Gives me something to lookforward to buying now.B&W- Bottom
Comment
-
Now that I have a Bluray player I haven't been buying any standard dvds. When 3:10 To Yuma came out I had already purchased a Panny BD 30 player so I bought the movie in Blu. Future releases that I may have purchased in standard will likely be added to my Blu collection--providing they are released in Blu. As for difference in PQ between Standard dvd and hi-def, well it is usually in the jaw-dropping detail, even with things as simple as a scratch on a fence. I use a Helios H4000 upconverting player for my standard dvds and it takes the image to near hi-def, but for that sparkling detail, it has to be hi-def.- Bottom
Comment
-
Maybe my projection screen is not big enough or my resolution isn't high enough--720p Sony VPL-AW15 with a 64 inch 16:9 DIY screen (or my PJ video processing is simply very good) but, with exception of Blade Runner, I have to say the improvement I see is noticeable, but not spectacularly so with HD DVD (I have an A2--will add a Blu-ray player later this year, probably in the fall). I watched The Bourne Ultimatum last night with my wife and after the movie, we compared a few shots with the SD on the flip side. I could see the improvement, but she had a very hard time finding much to get excited about. I know it's not the best film for that comparison (and I did not show her Blade Runner--she doesn't really care, she just indulges my hobby) but even I have to say the improvement was not "jaw-dropping". Later, I did an A/B of Casablanca and the same thing held true. The improvement was greater than with Bourne but it was not "OMG!!!! WHAT AN AMAZING...!!!!!11!!" (I'm exaggerating, of course--I don't react like that to much of anything). I'm happy I upgraded and I appreciate the higher quality, but I think the key is to manage one's expectations. I think if I had a 40inch HDTV with internal video processing of equal quality to that of my PJ, I would be hard pressed to see the difference unless I was doing a direct A/B with a lot of titles. Blade Runner, though, would be an improvement even on a 99$ portable DVD screen (assuming I could hook up an HDM player to such a display). But that owes much to the rather poor transfer of the SD DVD as well.
Essentially, as I've gone through about ten HD DVDs (of both recent and classic origin), I can say that the improvement, in my setup, over SD DVD is evolutionary, not revolutionary (except, again, for Blade Runner). I'm not unhappy but, perhaps, just a touch disappointed. However, I know there is room for improvement from the hardware end in my case (better projector/screen) but there is also the "jaded" factor setting in. I've had HD cable since August and at first, it was "WOW" and now, it's become the "standard". Perhaps if I'd gone HD with HDM before HD cable, the "WOW" factor would have been greater than it has been. It's all very nice, but I think we can become spoiled pretty quickly.- Bottom
Comment
-
And here I have blade runner sitting on the shelf un opened... now it sounds like it was all hype.
Ahh wellB&W- Bottom
Comment
-
Well, perhaps screen size has something to do with it, along with the display and the player. My screen is 92" wide and my projector is 1080p with 24fps capability and my Bluray player sends it 24fps, which is even better than 1080p at 60fps. I'm not sure the difference between standard and hi-def would be all that great on smaller screens, but it definitely is noticeable on my setup.- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by Race Car DriverAnd here I have blade runner sitting on the shelf un opened... now it sounds like it was all hype.
Ahh well
As for display size, my current room and its associated furniture/equipment does not really allow for a bigger screen unless I seriously compromise my front three speaker placement (I have my gear set up for optimal hi-res audio playback, within the limits of my room and gear budget, and this has caused me to sacrifice screen size and placement--it is also why my disappointment alluded to above is slight. I know I could improve the image if I prioritized the visual aspect of my setup, but I would then have to sacrifice the audio set up and that is not something I'm willing to do. We all have compromises to make in life. If ever I come into serious money, then I will have a cinema room and a separate audio room. But it ain't likely anytime soon.).- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ovationthen I will have a cinema room and a separate audio room. But it ain't likely anytime soon.).- Bottom
Comment
-
Well the Nvidia hardware codec is supposed to be pretty darn decent of scaling and I notice a large improvement between that and HD-DVD's and Blu Ray. I think with 1080P you would notice a much larger improvement though especially if you have something like a 100" screen. Ovation how far back to you sit from your 65" screen? Maybe your just sitting to far back for that size to see the difference?- Bottom
Comment
-
:thanku:Originally posted by OvationNo, it was not all hype at all. It is the one where I've seen the greatest improvement over the SD DVD. They're not even remotely in the same league. My comment about the portable DVD player was meant to say (apparently not very well) that the improvement is so great on Blade Runner that it would be readily apparent even on such a small, low grade display. I will be watching Blade Runner far more often now than I have before because it looks so good.
As for display size, my current room and its associated furniture/equipment does not really allow for a bigger screen unless I seriously compromise my front three speaker placement (I have my gear set up for optimal hi-res audio playback, within the limits of my room and gear budget, and this has caused me to sacrifice screen size and placement--it is also why my disappointment alluded to above is slight. I know I could improve the image if I prioritized the visual aspect of my setup, but I would then have to sacrifice the audio set up and that is not something I'm willing to do. We all have compromises to make in life. If ever I come into serious money, then I will have a cinema room and a separate audio room. But it ain't likely anytime soon.).
My bad!
I will wait until i get my ASW855 to watch this one opcorn:B&W- Bottom
Comment
-
Just my opinion, but I find that the difference between standard def DVD and HD-DVD to be such that if there is a movie I'm really keen on watching, I'll buy the HD-DVD instead of renting the standard def DVD. I'll still rent stuff if I don't plan on EVER watching it again, but for stuff that "may" have a re-watch, I'll glady buy the HD version if it is available. I find the PQ and SQ to most certainly be worth the extra few bucks.
I also plan on picking up a BD player as soon as I can save up some extra cash. Like some others, I don't really care which format wins. I'm happy watching HD-DVD right now and I'm sure I'll be happy watching BD when I grab a player.- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dougie085Well the Nvidia hardware codec is supposed to be pretty darn decent of scaling and I notice a large improvement between that and HD-DVD's and Blu Ray. I think with 1080P you would notice a much larger improvement though especially if you have something like a 100" screen. Ovation how far back to you sit from your 65" screen? Maybe your just sitting to far back for that size to see the difference?- Bottom
Comment
-
Remember a couple things, if you're trying to do a true A/B comparison to see if HD media is capable of a substantial difference over SD-DVD.
- Yes, resolution difference will be more noticeable on larger screens.
- If you don't have full 1080p capability, you aren't seeing everything that HD can do. (i.e. 1080p has a full 50% more resolution than 720p!)
- In reality, it's impossible to compare HD resolution to SD resolution on the same equipment. Either your player, your video display, or both will be upscaling the SD-DVD (or any other input) to high def resolution. So you're not comparing native 480i to native 720p (or whatever) you're comparing DVD upscaled to 720p, to native 720p. Still a difference, but not as great. Whatever the resolution of your display, it will ONLY show video in that resolution, and scale all input to that. The only way to show 480i is on a 480i video display.
- Similarly, unless you have equipment capable of playing the new HD audio formats, (and preferably staying digital as long as possible) you won't be exploring full capabilities of HD media.CHRIS
Well, we're safe for now. Thank goodness we're in a bowling alley.
- Pleasantville- Bottom
Comment
-
I only have a 720p display and I still think HD-DVD is a noticable step up. Everyones wow factor is going to be different. I have an XA2 which has one of the better in-player scalers, and I have seen some DVD transfers that approach HD quality (Gladiator SE), but HD-DVD and Blu-ray are still far and away better.
Race Car Driver,
Blade Runner is the best HD transfer (HD-DVD) I've seen yet. Sound&Vision had a story about the transfer process using a 4k transfer and then scaling down to 2k. Plus, the audio commentary on the final cut is Ridley Scott himself, and at the end, he gives his answer to one of the greatest sci-fi debates in film history.Santino
The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing.- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by George BellefontaineNow that I have a Bluray player I haven't been buying any standard dvds. When 3:10 To Yuma came out I had already purchased a Panny BD 30 player so I bought the movie in Blu. Future releases that I may have purchased in standard will likely be added to my Blu collection--providing they are released in Blu. As for difference in PQ between Standard dvd and hi-def, well it is usually in the jaw-dropping detail, even with things as simple as a scratch on a fence. I use a Helios H4000 upconverting player for my standard dvds and it takes the image to near hi-def, but for that sparkling detail, it has to be hi-def.
That's awesome man! Congratulations! :T
So, can you hear and see the differences in the various sound and video formats?- Bottom
Comment
Comment