Review: Rotel RSP1098 versus Parasound Halo C1 (side by side) updated

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • misterdoggy
    Super Senior Member
    • May 2005
    • 1418

    #46
    Peter,

    Would the sound quality (not talking about driving power) improve using the JC1 over the Krell Kav 2250 2x250w. ? woud I hear more detail at lower volumes ?

    Bruce

    Comment

    • Peter Nielsen
      Super Senior Member
      • Sep 2004
      • 1188

      #47
      Originally posted by misterdoggy
      Would the sound quality (not talking about driving power) improve using the JC1 over the Krell Kav 2250 2x250w. ? woud I hear more detail at lower volumes ?
      Some people tell stories like that, but personally I don't think so. Very seldom there is a "night-and-day" difference as some reviewers try to imply. I would say that the reason for you to justify a pair of JC1s is if you feel you need more power (or if you would like to move to monoblocks). If you're happy with the power of your KAVs, then I'd say that you don't need to look for any other amp. After all, it's a KRELL :wink:

      The JC1s will give you much more power a great price compared to what Krell charges for similar heavy-weight amps. (Please note that I'm in no way implying that you NEED more power. Some people, like me, need it and that's where the JC1 is a very economic solution. If I could justify the stratospheric cost of Krells, I would certainly go all Krell as well).

      Peter

      Comment

      • netarc
        Member
        • Jul 2003
        • 61

        #48
        Curious ... are electrostatic speakers, as a rule of thumb, generally inefficient speakers?

        I've a client with electrostat speakers rated at 84db/W @ 4m (that 4m rating is odd, I've typically only seen sensitivity rated at 1m!), and am thinking that he'd be better off with the JC1s, vs. the A21, from what Peter's been saying.

        Comment

        • Peter Nielsen
          Super Senior Member
          • Sep 2004
          • 1188

          #49
          Originally posted by netarc
          Curious ... are electrostatic speakers, as a rule of thumb, generally inefficient speakers?.
          Magnepans are using a magneplanar technology, not electrostatic technology.

          Electrostatic speakers require mains power (110/220V). Magnetic planars don't (which I personally think is a "blessing" since you don't have to power each speaker separately).

          Magnetic planar speakers generally present an "easy" load in the sense that it is purely resistive. (However, the amount of power required is also at a different level which makes the theorethically "easy" load not so easy :wink: ). Traditionally, electrostatic spreakers don't necessarily require huge amounts of power, but they are otherwise notoriously difficult to drive as the load is capacitive in nature. Consequently, some amps have serious problems driving 'stats.

          Originally posted by netarc
          I've a client with electrostat speakers rated at 84db/W @ 4m (that 4m rating is odd, I've typically only seen sensitivity rated at 1m!), and am thinking that he'd be better off with the JC1s, vs. the A21, from what Peter's been saying.
          That IS odd. 4 meters, on the other hand, is a very fair and realistic approximation of a real-life setup so I have to take my hat off for your speaker manufacturer! That's a very honest figure!!! I would guess that your speaker is around 95-97dB/W/1m but that's just an educated estimation.

          I've never owned a pair of electrostats, but many other JC1 owners say that they perform great with 'stats. (I'm sure Brent can confirm this, since he's so excited about the new Martin Logan Summits :B )

          Peter

          Comment

          Related Topics

          Collapse

          • asg420
            New to fourm.....Parasound vs. Rotel
            by asg420
            Hi -

            I must say that I am extremely excited to find your forum on the web. I am looking forward to becoming a part of your community and thank you in advance for your time to reply.

            I have been a long time devotee of Rotel recievers and B&W speakers. I have had the...
            20 July 2004, 10:21 Tuesday
          • rich0372
            Parasound 2205at vs rotel rmb1095
            by rich0372
            I was comparing the parasound 2205at and the rotel 1095 they are the same $$ distortion is the same .03% damping factor is 1000 for parasound and 400 for rotel also the 2205at has 220 per channel vs 200 for rotel has any one compared these amps the warranty is better for the 2205 also 10 years for parts...
            04 August 2004, 14:15 Wednesday
          • TommyV
            Parasound Halo P3 vs Rotel RC-1090/1082 preamp
            by TommyV
            I am thinking about upgrading my stereo preamp. Right now I have a Parasound NC 2100 that I really like feature wise but if I was up upgrade, which would be a better replacement. I am already a fan of Rotel but am fast becoming a fan of Parasound as well. I have a Rotel 1050 amp but am considering upgrading...
            08 June 2010, 21:01 Tuesday
          • PSUfan
            Multi input default
            by PSUfan
            I may have asked before, but I'm not certain. I use the multi-input for viewing blu ray. Is there a way to default the Rotel 1068 to it when you select a video input?

            I am aware of the button you can use on the remote.

            Thanks,
            Shane
            09 June 2010, 07:24 Wednesday
          • Chucka
            Parasound A51/52 vs Rotel RMB-1575/1565
            by Chucka
            Can someone compare these Parasound models with the newest Rotel "ICE" powered amplifiers as to sound quality and overall performance. I will be using with Totem Forest speakers. Would the A51 or the A52 be a better match for these speakers?

            Chucka
            23 October 2009, 17:13 Friday
          • Loading...
          • No more items.
          Working...
            Searching...Please wait.
            An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

            Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
            An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

            Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
            An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
            There are no results that meet this criteria.
            Search Result for "|||"