1068 vs B&K ref50 s2

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • luszer
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2003
    • 120

    #1

    1068 vs B&K ref50 s2

    I listed a similiar posting in the B&K forum, doesn't seem like much activity there.

    I currently own the 1068, and although happy, interested in comments. Also, using Sig 805s and soon the HTM4s teamed with an Aragon 3005, along with an Arcam DV89 and Rega Planet 2000.

    The 1068 does excel in HT, but I could use more dynamics in 2 channel. I seek additional lushness, a more textured sweet sound. I would enjoy more weight and fullness, however remaining relaxed and smooth but not muddy or bloated.

    Thanks, Ron
  • junior77blue
    Senior Member
    • Nov 2004
    • 635

    #2
    Have you considered using a seperate stereo preamp with processor loop in/out?

    That way you get best of both worlds, but add an additional component.

    I know rotel makes some stereo preamps, not sure if they have a procesor input.

    Comment

    • luszer
      Senior Member
      • Feb 2003
      • 120

      #3
      Junior77blue

      Thanks for the input, I actually did own the RC1070. Fully enjoy it, h/w my goal was to downsize to 1 main system. As a result, I upgraded my old 1066 with the 1068.
      Now seeking further audio bliss.


      Ron

      Comment

      • junior77blue
        Senior Member
        • Nov 2004
        • 635

        #4
        It would still be ONE system, but just an additional piece for stereo only applications.

        I don't think any multichannel pre/pro will compare with a dedicated stereo preamp.

        Same would apply to amplifiers. Not sure how much better its gonna get unless you goto the anthems that everyone seems to make as the benchmark.

        Comment

        • luszer
          Senior Member
          • Feb 2003
          • 120

          #5
          Understood. My bad.

          I agree when I owned the RC1070 there was something different sounding in comparison to even the 1068 running in "bypass" direct mode. The 1070 always was a cut above the 1068.

          I have been really happy with the Aragon multi channel amp, 5x300w. If I were to expand to 7.1 then adding the dedicated stereo amp would be magically.
          Does a stereo amp, all things consistant. always prevail over a multichannel amp?
          I thought with the way the multi channels are designed today it can pull in enough reserve to meet even the most demanding load be it 2 channel or 5.1

          I have heard great things as well regarding the Cinenova beasts, but jumped on the Aragon at a good price.

          Comment

          • junior77blue
            Senior Member
            • Nov 2004
            • 635

            #6
            I haven't been in the market for amps so haven't done any serious listening. However, on paper, keypoint PAPER...stereo amps typically have better specs than their multi-channel counterparts.

            I'm sure other people will chime in here to back this up or refute it.

            Comment

            Related Topics

            Collapse

            Working...
              Searching...Please wait.
              An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

              Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
              An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

              Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
              An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
              There are no results that meet this criteria.
              Search Result for "|||"