Hi,
I'm a first-time Rotel buyer and am doing a demo of the 1067 at home right now. I'm trying to decide if I should go up to the separates instead. I can't wait to get all my stuff setup.
I have a couple 1075/1095 questions. Do they use the WBT style binding posts? The 1067 I'm demoing now has those, and I really like them - but the demos of the amps that my dealer had on-hand had standard binding posts. Maybe the demos my dealer is using are older versions? Also, are they bi-wireable on the amp side using 2 separate runs of cable? Right now I use a more common bi-wire setup - where the speaker cable is standard on the amp side and bi-wire on the speaker side. If it's possible on the amp side, is there any real improvement on using 2 separate cable runs vs the normal single cable bi-wire?
Thanks for taking the time to read!
RJ
I'm a first-time Rotel buyer and am doing a demo of the 1067 at home right now. I'm trying to decide if I should go up to the separates instead. I can't wait to get all my stuff setup.
I have a couple 1075/1095 questions. Do they use the WBT style binding posts? The 1067 I'm demoing now has those, and I really like them - but the demos of the amps that my dealer had on-hand had standard binding posts. Maybe the demos my dealer is using are older versions? Also, are they bi-wireable on the amp side using 2 separate runs of cable? Right now I use a more common bi-wire setup - where the speaker cable is standard on the amp side and bi-wire on the speaker side. If it's possible on the amp side, is there any real improvement on using 2 separate cable runs vs the normal single cable bi-wire?
Thanks for taking the time to read!
RJ

Comment