Hi guys,
I need some help with the never ending problem of itchy feet with my audio/ht gear. About 6 moths ago I moved from a Rotel RSP 976 and Chinese Consonance amps to a Primare SPA 20 integrated h/t amp. The first moment I turned the Primare on I knew that I loved the sound it produced in 2 channel. Home theatre is also better that what I had but not by such a great degree. The Primare does not have the power I had before, that is 5 x 100 wpc now compared to a two and and a three channel each producing about 130 wpc. I do notice the power difference but also notice that the actual sound quality is better than my old gear.
I really love the Primare as the sound quality is great, it's built like a tank at 22.5 kg, has two torroidals and the build quality is great but I have a hankering for more power. To add Primare amps it's going to cost me a packet. With what I could get for the Primare I could get a Rotel Processor (1068 due in Aus next month I'm told) and a 1075 or three 1070's.
I want to keep the combined h/t and music system but am worried that the Primare may be better than the new 1068 for two channel. The Primare can be a bit quirky at times in its operation as well whereas the rotel is pretty straight forward. The Primare also causes great distress to my television reception, radio frequency interfearance I believe. Even when it's turned off in standby mode the computer in the Primare must be running as there's no improvement.
Has anybody compared the Primare SPA20 or even the SP31 processor to the new Rotel 1068 and if so what were the results?
I know the 1075 is a good amp as I have read all of the reviews and it even compares well when reviewed against a Primare 30.5 and a 5ch Krell. I guess 3 x 1070's will be even better than one 1075.
I currently have Epos M22's mains, as Epos M8 centre, an MJ Acoustics Reference 1 sub and some other (not to be named) rears.
My room is approx 6 metres x 6 metres with a 2 meter tall ceiling. (yes, that's how we spell metres in Aus)
I listen to music 60 percent movies 40 per cent.
One more question. When listening to two channel can the sub and all other processing be turned off on the 1068. The Primare has a bypass mode which turns off all of these features and reverts to a straight two channel amp. Using this mode makes a HUGE difference to sound quality and sound stage. In fact it's like two different systems.
Thanks,
Glen.
I need some help with the never ending problem of itchy feet with my audio/ht gear. About 6 moths ago I moved from a Rotel RSP 976 and Chinese Consonance amps to a Primare SPA 20 integrated h/t amp. The first moment I turned the Primare on I knew that I loved the sound it produced in 2 channel. Home theatre is also better that what I had but not by such a great degree. The Primare does not have the power I had before, that is 5 x 100 wpc now compared to a two and and a three channel each producing about 130 wpc. I do notice the power difference but also notice that the actual sound quality is better than my old gear.
I really love the Primare as the sound quality is great, it's built like a tank at 22.5 kg, has two torroidals and the build quality is great but I have a hankering for more power. To add Primare amps it's going to cost me a packet. With what I could get for the Primare I could get a Rotel Processor (1068 due in Aus next month I'm told) and a 1075 or three 1070's.
I want to keep the combined h/t and music system but am worried that the Primare may be better than the new 1068 for two channel. The Primare can be a bit quirky at times in its operation as well whereas the rotel is pretty straight forward. The Primare also causes great distress to my television reception, radio frequency interfearance I believe. Even when it's turned off in standby mode the computer in the Primare must be running as there's no improvement.
Has anybody compared the Primare SPA20 or even the SP31 processor to the new Rotel 1068 and if so what were the results?
I know the 1075 is a good amp as I have read all of the reviews and it even compares well when reviewed against a Primare 30.5 and a 5ch Krell. I guess 3 x 1070's will be even better than one 1075.
I currently have Epos M22's mains, as Epos M8 centre, an MJ Acoustics Reference 1 sub and some other (not to be named) rears.
My room is approx 6 metres x 6 metres with a 2 meter tall ceiling. (yes, that's how we spell metres in Aus)
I listen to music 60 percent movies 40 per cent.
One more question. When listening to two channel can the sub and all other processing be turned off on the 1068. The Primare has a bypass mode which turns off all of these features and reverts to a straight two channel amp. Using this mode makes a HUGE difference to sound quality and sound stage. In fact it's like two different systems.
Thanks,
Glen.

)
Comment