CLASSE SSP-300 vs McIntosh MX-119 for B&W 803S?

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • scanido
    Senior Member
    • Apr 2006
    • 548

    #1

    CLASSE SSP-300 vs McIntosh MX-119 for B&W 803S?

    Hey guys,

    I am willing to upgrade my trusty Rotel RSX-1057 for either one of the processors listed in the subject. I have a McIntosh MC205 multi-channel amp and at first thought, one would couple the amp with the corresponding MX-119 from the same company, but I can get both for relatively the same price. Unfortunately I do not have the time nor the access to hear either one of the processors with my amp so I am enlisting help for everyone here who has compared either one of these processors. Amp aside, which one would you go with and why??

    Thanks all!
  • jericho
    Senior Member
    • Dec 2004
    • 280

    #2
    I'd go with the MX-120 from Mcintosh, you find it for a good price on audiogon and it makes a wonderful combi with your MC205. I myself have the mx-135. I would not take the mx-119 because it does not have HDMI. For the few $ more you have the MX-120 with HDMI (only 1.1)

    Comment

    • style
      Super Senior Member
      • Feb 2006
      • 1562

      #3
      Hallo scanido,

      If you have a MC205 go whit a MC....

      I have had a MC205 too, sold and I'm go to Classe....

      Like jericho wrote:
      the MX119 or 120(HDMI!!) BUT you can have a Mx119 for a good price and buy a separate video scaler like DVDO Edge. HDMI at 1.3....one of the best product in this liga price!! and what for performances!!!!!

      Greetings Style

      Comment

      • htsteve
        Super Senior Member
        • Sep 2004
        • 1216

        #4
        scanido,

        First, either choice should be a very nice sound improvement. I have the MC205 and a MX120 driving 802D's, HTM2D and N804's. It is a wonderful combination with truly excellent performance (both in 2 channel and HT). I tend to favor using the amp and pre-amp from the same company. The integration tends to be very good.

        As noted, the MX119 does not contain HDMI. The MX120 does have HDMI and will scale non HD video up to 1080p (HD video is simply passed through). Also note that neither unit will decode the new HD audio formats. My Blu ray player does the decoding and sends the audio via analog to the MX120.


        Hope this helps.

        Comment

        • style
          Super Senior Member
          • Feb 2006
          • 1562

          #5
          @scanido,


          how do you go pay for a Mx119 vs. Mx120...this is the point.


          A separat scaler /video is sure better what you can have ohres product.

          the DVDO Edge in not very expensive (expec. vs. the 50Pro!! -$.800???)

          at first all the preampli from MC are very overpriced!!!!!
          with the 119/120 you go have XLR "only2 for the front (L/C/R) and with the 135/136 all channel are with XLR....

          get out your money ONLY for what you really need. (is better wait a moment and save money for buy a 135/136 in place to buy a 119/120 abd in a paar month go change it..OR???


          Style

          Comment

          • sikoniko
            Super Senior Member
            • Aug 2003
            • 2299

            #6
            I believe in synergy. If you like Mc' and you already have a Mc' amp, get the Mc' pre.
            I'm just sittin here watchin the wheels go round and round...

            Comment

            • scanido
              Senior Member
              • Apr 2006
              • 548

              #7
              Sounds to me like the consensus is keeping with the Mac. There are some great prices now on the MX-119 and it is tempting to upgrade but do you think I will be gaining much more in terms of sound quality over my RSX-1057, for movies and 2-Channel?

              I would obviously like to take advantage of the new HD audio formats via HDMI, but this option does not exist yet, at least for McIntosh. I went to the dealer and the sales rep recommended the new Rotel Processor RSP-1057.

              http://www.rotel.com/NA/Products/Pro...74&Tab=2&Pic=2

              The new processor would give me the new HDMI that supports the new HD audio and it is more recent, which may or maynot be up to par with the older McIntosh. What do you guys think???

              Comment

              • htsteve
                Super Senior Member
                • Sep 2004
                • 1216

                #8
                scanido,

                I totally understand your dilemma. I had Rotel and went to the Mac's. I knew going in that the Mac's didn't do the new HD audio formats. That meant I needed a Blu Ray player that will decode these formats and send the signals out via analog RCA's. There are plenty of good BR players out now that do this.

                The overall sound increase is quite large with the Mac. I would definitely get the MX-119 and the correct BR player. You would be quite set.


                Hope this helps.

                Comment

                Related Topics

                Collapse

                • wildmda
                  Mcintosh MX120
                  by wildmda
                  I am reading the mx120 is two channel. I am not sure what this fully means so am needing some education. Will the McIntosh MX120 it work for HT as well as music?

                  I would have the following:

                  802D fronts
                  HTM2 center
                  ASW855 sub
                  685 rears

                  ...
                  26 November 2009, 11:27 Thursday
                • scanido
                  Rotel RSP-1069 VS McIntosh MX119 Processors
                  by scanido
                  Hey All,

                  Need advice from the trusty board. Currently I have a Rotel RSX-1057 and am using as my Processor powering my MAC MC205. With a budget of $3000 I can get either the RSP-1069 or a used MX119.

                  I will be connecting the processor to my PS3 via HDMI for the RSP1069...
                  30 April 2008, 18:43 Wednesday
                • scanido
                  B&W and Anthem processors
                  by scanido
                  Anyone using a 800 series setup and any of the recent Anthem processors, particularly the D2, AVM50?

                  I'm trying to gather input from actual users of their experiences from this processors. The room correction software really looks promising but I wonder if there would be any audio synergy...
                  01 September 2009, 13:44 Tuesday
                • audioqueso
                  Emotiva vs McIntosh comparison
                  by audioqueso
                  Test Setup:
                  Source/Pre: HTPC with RME 9632 soundcard/ASIO/flac.
                  Amp 1: McIntosh MA6800 (used as amp)
                  Amp 2: Emotiva XPA-5
                  * All sources switched by matrix switch to prevent less than a second of a gap in the music
                  **Levels were adjusted one the RME soundcard so that...
                  15 August 2009, 10:25 Saturday
                • audioqueso
                  Testing B&W with McIntosh & Marantz
                  by audioqueso
                  I'm curious about a test I want to do. So I would like to get people's opinion about this test.

                  I have $4-5k budget that I have to improve my B&W Nautilus 805/HTM2 setup. I currently have a Marantz SR7002 AV receiver powering them.

                  I've been wanting to audition McIntosh...
                  29 January 2009, 21:16 Thursday
                • Loading...
                • No more items.
                Working...
                  Searching...Please wait.
                  An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

                  Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                  An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

                  Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                  An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
                  There are no results that meet this criteria.
                  Search Result for "|||"