So not all Bypass modes sound the same

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • misterdoggy
    Super Senior Member
    • May 2005
    • 1418

    #1

    So not all Bypass modes sound the same

    I haven't had a chance to test the theory, but isn't bypass = bypass. I mean isn't the signal untouched or are there other factors ie: wiring, plugs. I mean there has to be something in order to control volume.

    I am about to go bypass mode thru a Pass Labs X1 which the volume control will be coming from A Lexicon mc12b.

    Before I had the bypass run thru the lexicon direct from the DAC for stereo but now will run stereo thru the preamp and bypass the l&r channels of the HT.

    Can anyone shed light on the subject.
  • Karma
    Senior Member
    • Nov 2005
    • 801

    #2
    Originally posted by Karma
    HI doggy,
    Not all bypasses are created equal. There are different ways to implement it; expensive and cheap. In the case of the Krell KAV-280p preamp, relays are used to implement the gain change and alter the signal path. This is the expensive way.

    My Denon AV receiver does it differently. Here an analog circuit called an "Analog Switch" is used. They are pretty good and are used extensively where signal quality is not of absolute importance. But it is an active circuit (not exactly but kind of like an amplifier with a gain of 1) which can and is characterized by its performance limits. This is the cheap and most common way especially in less than top end equipment. Best to avoid if possible.

    Relays, done right, are much better since there is less opportunity to corrupt the delicate audio signal. This and a thousand other very definite things are the reasons that some equipment costs more than others.

    But, in the final analysis, the simplist signal path is almost always best. There are some restrictions even here because the reality of physics imposes itself. For example, will that nifty passive circuit drive the necessary cable capacitance? And the list goes on. Blanket statements will almost always prove wrong in specific cases. Only our ears will reveal the truth .

    Sparky
    HI Doggy,
    I posted the above quote maybe two weeks ago in YOUR thread talking about this very issue. You now ask a question about as though it has never been mentioned. I can see why you might want to get more information but, for the sake of others who might want information on the same subject, you should at least reference the earlier post.

    NO, not all bypasses are created equal.

    Sparky
    Last edited by Karma; 04 March 2006, 09:46 Saturday.

    Comment

    • misterdoggy
      Super Senior Member
      • May 2005
      • 1418

      #3
      whoops

      Sparky,

      You are right. Its I'm getting old and forgetful. I was away in Guadeloupe for 8 days and came back thinking about the same subject that passed my mind before leaving.

      I read a chat somewhere about how a bypass sounded in one receiver as opposed to another and still can't figure it out.

      Just wondering how the bypass in the Pass Labs X1 Preamp will compare with the bypass in the Lexicon Mc12B. Both are top quality items in their respective realms

      thanks
      Doggy

      Comment

      Related Topics

      Collapse

      • misterdoggy
        Does anyone use a Preamp to bypass HT
        by misterdoggy
        I am using a CD to DAC to bypass in the Processor. I'm wondering if a good Preamp in the process might add something.

        This would be just for stereo CD's of course. Any experience would be appreciated.

        Ayre CD to Goldmund Dac to bypass Lexicon mc12b to krell fpb400cx...
        12 February 2006, 11:02 Sunday
      • stewfoo
        Dropping Rotel and maybe REL Stentor for Classe or Lexicon and Velodyne DD18
        by stewfoo
        I am looking at improving my electronics to better match my 803s. I was considerint the Lexicon Mc12B or the Classe Delta ssp600/300. Any thoughts or suggestions on other kit I should consider? Btw, I listen to 70% Ht, 20% music 10% nagging wife lol
        I have also come to the conclusion that the...
        20 November 2005, 02:11 Sunday
      • VictorHRS
        Lexicon MC-12 HD and 2ch audio
        by VictorHRS
        Hello everyone,

        I was offered a brand new Lexicon MC-12 HD (the simple one, not balanced and no RoomEq) recently by my dealer with a very good price and I'm pondering if I should buy it.

        Currently my 2ch system consists of an Accuphase DP-67 cd player, an Accuphase E-308...
        03 November 2006, 13:25 Friday
      • howzitwerk
        Lexicon MC-4 vs external DAC's
        by howzitwerk
        I have a MC-4 that I'm only using in 2-ch stereo for the most part. I do plan to setup 7 channel at some point, but I'm so happy with 2-ch and my Orion's that I'm in no hurry. I keep getting intrigued by the Benchmark DAC-1 USB to use with my Mac Mini, which I usually use over Toslink to the Lex just...
        08 January 2009, 23:09 Thursday
      • bleeding ears
        Bypass mode on 1068, bass overkill
        by bleeding ears
        Hi guys, has anyone else found that bypass mode on the 1068 processor creates too much bass.

        Ok, perhaps its not actually creating the bass but it does allow too much bass thru, a lot of the time.

        I find the sound with some cd's to be substantially better in bypass compared...
        07 April 2006, 02:16 Friday
      • Loading...
      • No more items.
      Working...
        Searching...Please wait.
        An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

        Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
        An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

        Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
        An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
        There are no results that meet this criteria.
        Search Result for "|||"