NAD on the way

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jayman_1975
    Junior Member
    • Jul 2006
    • 24

    #1

    NAD on the way

    Hey all, I have been reading alot on this forum but have yet to post till now. I have recently sold my Denon 3805 and am awaiting the arival of a NAD T752. I read alot of reviews and post on different forums raving about NAD products, I saw a good deal on this one so i pulled the trigger.

    I have been reading some more about the NAD and have discovered that it has only 24/96 DACs and most other newer AVR's including my denon have 24/192 DACs. Being a little bit of a novice i am not exactly sure what this means in terms of sound quality or processing but some have said that this is not good. Would someone on here be able to help me out and explain in english what i will be missing with the difference in DACs.

    Also, I plan to run my polk audio (monitor series CS2 and M40s) center and surrounds off the NAD, and my fronts (M70s) off my Rotel RB 1070 amp. Has anyone heard a Rotel/NAD combination and would care to comment on how they thought the two sounded together?
  • Briz vegas
    Super Senior Member
    • Mar 2005
    • 1199

    #2
    NAD have always gone for audio quality over features. At the price i would be surprised if you are not happy with its performance. The DACs may not be as new as some but its the filters and other components in the analogue stage that will make the difference.

    I had a NAD 713 dolby pro-logic receiver when dolby digital was the new kid on the block, yet the 713 sounded better than the new digital receivers and systems I was hearing in the shops. My 713 is about 12 years old and is still going strong in its current home.
    Mac 8gb SSD Audirvana ->Weiss INT202 firewire interface ->Naim DAC & XPS2 DR->Conrad Johnson CT5 & LP70S-> Vivid B1s. Nordost Valhalla cables & resonance management. (Still waiting for Paul Hynes PS:M)
    Siamese :evil: :twisted:

    Comment

    • pearsall001
      Member
      • Dec 2005
      • 77

      #3
      Congrats on the NAD!! :T I know you will be very pleased with your new NAD purchase. I have the NAD T773 AVR & it is a stellar performer. No phoney bells & whistles, just rock solid performance that will keep you going for years to come. Enjoy!!

      Comment

      • subynube
        Senior Member
        • Apr 2007
        • 104

        #4
        I have also heard that NAD is an awesome line up. However, I know in the past few years they have had a few quality control issues, like a quiet hissing coming from the speakers when the receiver is on, as well as cutout or dropout of digital signals when a dvd or cd player is hooked into the receiver through the digital connections. Anyone else want to comment on this for the newer units? Other than that, I know they are strong sound quality receivers and amps.

        Comment

        • Amphiprion
          Senior Member
          • Apr 2006
          • 886

          #5
          You will be missing nothing with the 24/96kHz DAC's. Audiophiles might tell you different, but I'm an electronics design engineer (BSEE '03) with a subspecialty in DSP. I also believe that knowledge is significantly worth more than opinions

          Enjoy your receiver. NAD is a quality company and I'm sure you'll enjoy the 752.

          Comment

          • jayman_1975
            Junior Member
            • Jul 2006
            • 24

            #6
            thanx for the replies. To respond to the QC issues, I have read about all the problems that NAD has had with their AVR's and was very leary about pulling the trigger on this unit. I talked to the guy on the phone for a quite awhile and he assured me that this unit is problem free. NAD replaced his earlier unit with this one less than a year ago and in fact still has warranty (through him) until Sept 07 and has all the latest firmware and software upgrades. Even so, I was suffering a little buyers remorse even before i recieved the unit until i read some of your responses. I have read others as well that rant about the quality of sound that NAD is known for and am looking forward to getting it all hooked up. I'll post my opinions on it when i get it set up and rockin the house. Cheers.

            Comment

            • Alaric
              Ultra Senior Member
              • Jan 2006
              • 4151

              #7
              I also believe that knowledge is significantly worth more than opinions
              While that is quite true in many areas , I still prefer to hear audio equipment , rather than read a spec sheet. To quote Mark Twain , "There are three kinds of lies : Lies , damned lies , and statistics."
              Lee

              Marantz PM7200-RIP
              Marantz PM-KI Pearl
              Schiit Modi 3
              Marantz CD5005
              Paradigm Studio 60 v.3

              Comment

              • Amphiprion
                Senior Member
                • Apr 2006
                • 886

                #8
                Calling what comes with audio equipment 'spec sheets' is a joke One of the things I've learned since starting as a design engineer is how to read a data sheet (note the different wording) for electronic components. It's more how they say it or what they're not saying that's the most important part when you're looking at a data sheet. That and making sure you got the damn pinouts and connections right (seriously, who the hell makes a device that only works when the enable pin is grounded? Bassackwards). (Bitter experience talking there).

                I agree sthat consumer oriented pec sheets are worthless and listening is important. But in the end a very thorough bench test will tell me more than what a few dozen audiophile's opinions will.

                Comment

                • bigburner
                  Super Senior Member
                  • May 2005
                  • 2649

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Amphiprion
                  But in the end a very thorough bench test will tell me more than what a few dozen audiophile's opinions will.
                  Whew, brave talk Mark! You're one of a minority of members in this forum who believes that audio is a science, not an art. Prepare yourself to be severely chastised.

                  Nigel.

                  Comment

                  • Briz vegas
                    Super Senior Member
                    • Mar 2005
                    • 1199

                    #10
                    Thing is most of the guys on this forum "love" good quality sound/HT. Trying to divorce the emotion from the science is next to impossible.

                    I think having guys like Mark on the forum is great, its a better place for it. I like to know as much as possible about the technical side of things (at least as far as I can understand), maybe get a few opinions and then go and listen for myself for as long as possible.
                    Mac 8gb SSD Audirvana ->Weiss INT202 firewire interface ->Naim DAC & XPS2 DR->Conrad Johnson CT5 & LP70S-> Vivid B1s. Nordost Valhalla cables & resonance management. (Still waiting for Paul Hynes PS:M)
                    Siamese :evil: :twisted:

                    Comment

                    • bigburner
                      Super Senior Member
                      • May 2005
                      • 2649

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Briz vegas
                      Thing is most of the guys on this forum "love" good quality sound/HT. Trying to divorce the emotion from the science is next to impossible.

                      I think having guys like Mark on the forum is great, its a better place for it. I like to know as much as possible about the technical side of things (at least as far as I can understand), maybe get a few opinions and then go and listen for myself for as long as possible.
                      Good compromise Briz!

                      Comment

                      • Alaric
                        Ultra Senior Member
                        • Jan 2006
                        • 4151

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Briz vegas
                        Thing is most of the guys on this forum "love" good quality sound/HT. Trying to divorce the emotion from the science is next to impossible.

                        I think having guys like Mark on the forum is great, its a better place for it. I like to know as much as possible about the technical side of things (at least as far as I can understand), maybe get a few opinions and then go and listen for myself for as long as possible.
                        I couldn't agree more. Since I'm not an EE , I don't know as much about the stuff as a real EE. In fact , my technical knowledge may rival Walter's (my rhododendron) , but not by much. Not all my experiences with engineers have been rewarding . I've seen some pretty blueprints for stuff that doesn't work , so I question everything . Not knowing enough to know what to ask doesn't help , either. ops:
                        Lee

                        Marantz PM7200-RIP
                        Marantz PM-KI Pearl
                        Schiit Modi 3
                        Marantz CD5005
                        Paradigm Studio 60 v.3

                        Comment

                        • whoaru99
                          Senior Member
                          • Jul 2004
                          • 639

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Alaric
                          Not knowing enough to know what to ask doesn't help , either. ops:
                          I think this is a very good point. It's often the case for many consumers at all levels. I also think this very point is counted upon quite heavily when it comes to trying to separate fact from fiction (or harder yet, fact from half-truths).
                          There are some things which are impossible to know, but it is impossible to know which things these are. :scratchhead:

                          ----JAFFE'S PRECEPT

                          Comment

                          Related Topics

                          Collapse

                          • jayman_1975
                            NAD is in the house
                            by jayman_1975
                            Hey all. I just received my NAD T752 and have it hooked up. The unit itself is in mint condition as my seller told me. Initially i thought that it was not a very nice looking receiver as it is quite plain but it is growing on me now.
                            I tried hooking it up with my Rotel RB 1070 powering my...
                            12 May 2007, 17:40 Saturday
                          • markusp
                            Replace NAD T752 with Rotel RSP-1066?
                            by markusp
                            Hello everyone. I have the opportunity to pick up a Rotel RSP-1066 for a decent price and wonder if it would be worth my while to do so? I currently have a NAD T752 hooked up to two older Rotel RMB956ax amps and powered Def Tech speakers. While I am happy with the sound I now have, I have always...
                            11 August 2004, 08:35 Wednesday
                          • buffalocharlie
                            Rotel vs. NAD
                            by buffalocharlie
                            I have narrowed my choice of a new A/V receivers to 2: the NAD T762 (not yet available) and the Rotel RSX-1055.
                            I am most concerned with stereo sound quality, both brands have their loyal fans, and detractors. Both units can be had for about $1100, and both list for $1399. I want the upgradability...
                            08 January 2003, 11:17 Wednesday
                          • Briz vegas
                            Sweet sounding B&W 705......... Finally
                            by Briz vegas
                            The 705 did not get much love on this forum. The story was one about the treble, and it wasn't liked much for that reason. I struggled with them and ended up with 804s, then finally Vivid B1s, all of which I still own.

                            So, what is the new role for my frustrating 705s that makes them...
                            16 December 2013, 02:58 Monday
                          • PewterTA
                            Impressions on the NAD M51
                            by PewterTA
                            Well I've had my NAD M51 for over a week so far using it everyday and I figured I'd post up some impressions and opinions on the DAC. First I will say that my unit is a factory (NAD) refurbished which saved a few hundred bucks on the unit. I ordered it from SpearIt Sound up in Massachusetts and they...
                            01 January 2014, 20:46 Wednesday
                          • Loading...
                          • No more items.
                          Working...
                            Searching...Please wait.
                            An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

                            Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                            An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

                            Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                            An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
                            There are no results that meet this criteria.
                            Search Result for "|||"