B&K vs Brsyton

**Crimson** · 27 June 2001, 20:00 Wednesday

Hmm...should I really give you my opinion?

I've got a bias towards Maggies and Bryston, and would say try the 3B with the 1.4's. If you're willing, try both of them. The 3B 'may' have better definition and control on the low end, but the mid- and high-band performance between the three will probably be based on your preference. Sounds like fun though!

Q.

**John Kotches** · 27 June 2001, 23:03 Wednesday

Original 3B (and others) (no -NRB no -ST) earned Bryston the nickname Brightston.

You have to be careful of the system context or it does get a wee big bright. Maybe a nice tube preamp could keep you away from that fate.

Regards,

---
Editor, PC/Home Theater
Secrets of Home Theater and High Fidelity
My Home Theater
NEC LT-150 specific page.

**Lex** · 27 June 2001, 23:41 Wednesday

Yes, another example that comes to mind of older not necessarily being better is Proceed where amps are concerned. I can't recall the series, but the first amps from Proceed were crap. Of course, the HPA series and AMP5 changed all that. I think the new lower line amps from Proceed also proudly wear the Proceed badge. But that's heresay. I personally have not had much experience with them other than seeing them. That's the BPA series or some such.

But back to Bryston, unfortunately, I do think this is an audition to find out situation...

Lex

**ThomasW** · 28 June 2001, 11:10 Thursday

The nice thing with the Bryston is that it can probably be "fixed" one of 2 ways. First is DIY changing out caps, etc., this voids the warranty. Second is by sending it back to Bryston and getting it upgraded. The upgrade renews the transferable 20yr warranty.

The Bryston will do a better job physically driving the maggies. It's sound quality may not be quite as good as the B&K, but IMHO it's a better longterm investment

theAudioWorx
Klone-Audio

B&K vs Brsyton

B&K vs Brsyton

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment