Audio Research SP16L vs. SP17L
Do I understand correctly that the SP17L replaces the SP16L? Can someone familiar with both highlight the differences for me? I have read the specs on both, but I am more interested in actual audible differences. Thank you kindly.
-
-
I heard a Reference 3 today. System sounded nice but that same system sounded great with other less expensive pre-amps as well. The guy who owned the system was very impressed to start with but ultimately felt it did not engage him at an emotional level (too clinical ? Another hifi head said it might as well be solid state - I have heard that comment about a few valve preamps recently). The guy trying the Reference 3 said the same about the SP16 that he tried.
Thats not really answering your question but thats my 2 cents.Mac 8gb SSD Audirvana ->Weiss INT202 firewire interface ->Naim DAC & XPS2 DR->Conrad Johnson CT5 & LP70S-> Vivid B1s. Nordost Valhalla cables & resonance management. (Still waiting for Paul Hynes PS:M)
Siamese :evil: :twisted: -
The simplest way I can describe the difference between the two is that in the "16" it took from the "9" mkII and brought it up another level (12ax7 tube compliment) , whereas the "17" borrows on the topology of the ref 3, LS-26 (6h30 tubes) for is sonic signature, at an afordable "entry level" if you will.
Now putting it into what I have heard is like this, the "16" is more typical of a 12ax7 pre-amp, one needs to be more carefull with tube selection for the 12ax7's microphonic tendencies at times, but it can possess a little more "bloom" if you will. With the "17" and the 6H30 tubes, it is more neutral / passive device with respect to it's sonic signature, and for that reason I believe it is a truthfully revealing piece of equipment.
I have had ARC pre-amps in my system for twenty years now, my present one being the LS-26, and I feel they represent a accurate handling of what ever source you feed them.
If you favor lots of midrange bloom then ARC is not for you. Cary with their exstensive use of 6sn7 tubes will give you that instead.
As always, let your ears decide !Dave
Comment
-
I have a Xindak LP-1 phonostage. Sounds much better then what most people would think. But now I want to try rolling tubes. Anyone here use JJ tubes? I have easy access to them I need 2 12AU7 and 2 12AX7. Changing which ones will change the sound/tone the most? I just want to warm up the sound just... -
I was at my friendly neighborhood audio shop returning an amp I had purchase a few days before (jeff rowland model 102...thought it sounded too bright)
After explaining my thoughts to the sales guy he suggested I take a listen to a tube setup...unfortunately he didn't have a full tube... -
Ok, here's my attempt at a review of my recently-upgraded "Cubicle Audio System", featuring the ASL MG Head OTL tube headphone amp, especially designed to fill my head with great sounding music while I slave away at my PC at work!
Before I get into the details of my new gear,... -
Howdy,
I was thinking with more companies starting to create Class D amps, I'm hoping to see more Preamps/processors from companies that used to create preamps. I remember in the early 90s there were many mid range companies such as rotel making preamps. They pulled out for whatever... -
My question is exactly what I said in the title. Can I buy one of the new
Rotel preamps in black? This might be an old question, but on Rotel's website it does not say if neither of these preamps can be had in black. Can anyone answer this. I really appreciate it. Thanks. Also does anyone think...
Comment