2021-2023 Isiris Update

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • technodanvan
    Senior Member
    • Nov 2009
    • 998

    Originally posted by JonMarsh
    Click image for larger version  Name:	Screenshot 2023-01-30 at 8.57.47 AM.png Views:	0 Size:	763.9 KB ID:	928428
    This is a beryllium part? Really doesn't have the protection I'd expect on the dome...
    - Danny

    Comment

    • Evil Twin
      Super Senior Member
      • Nov 2004
      • 1531

      This is what happens when “style” is emphasized over safety or utility. Sure you never see any other examples of that kind of behavior in modern life…
      DFAL
      Dark Force Acoustic Labs

      A wholly owned subsidiary of Palpatine Heavy Industries

      Comment

      • dar47
        Senior Member
        • Nov 2008
        • 873

        Interesting, if you are developing a 3rd order for this top end with the TW29B-B-4 maybe it would also be a nice two-way option with a PR in your "No one needs another 2-way".

        Was looking at Treols G. Purify BE design, he using a port with a simple 2nd order network. I think your magic stuff might be better.

        Comment

        • JonMarsh
          Mad Max Moderator
          • Aug 2000
          • 15261

          Good points- note that ET has been considering a number of possible configurations for that PuriFi based two way system... this includes...
          • a tweeter like the SB29BAC, which is very, very similar to the TW29B-B-4, but with less flashy cosmetics and better dome protection. And slightly lower cost, not being a "Satori" model.
          • The venerable but hard to source DA25TX008, which we still argue is one of the finest dome tweeters available if implemented with the right crossover- we have a small stock on hand, and more coming from a very remote sector... you'd have to go to Antarctica for it to be any more remote.
          • And the TPL75, discussed in his post, which was thought to be a "most interesting" alternative as well as a bit off the beaten track for DIY, so to speak... and besides, he wanted to hear it in at least a POC test build...
          • There are even some other stranger possibilities being discussed, like the AST25120, pending some measurements and packaging experiments.
          • And last, but not necessarily least, the modified/special back cup design for the GRS PT2522. Needless to say, it's intriguing to come up with the best solution for the minimum dollars, as well as the best overall solution. This applies to the woofer as well... the other logical candidate is the NAA driver being evaluated for the Isiris update, which is more expensive.
          the AudioWorx
          Natalie P
          M8ta
          Modula Neo DCC
          Modula MT XE
          Modula Xtreme
          Isiris
          Wavecor Ardent

          SMJ
          Minerva Monitor
          Calliope
          Ardent D

          In Development...
          Isiris Mk II updates- in final test stage!
          Obi-Wan
          Saint-Saëns Symphonique/AKA SMJ-40
          Modula PWB
          Calliope CC Supreme
          Natalie P Ultra
          Natalie P Supreme
          Janus BP1 Sub


          Resistance is not futile, it is Volts divided by Amperes...
          Just ask Mr. Ohm....

          Comment

          • Evil Twin
            Super Senior Member
            • Nov 2004
            • 1531

            This measurement set is NULL AND VOID!

            A configuration problem with the test mixer because of poorly documented monitoring setup has been identified, which resulted in feedback causing ripples in the response curve appearing like time domain issues with the signal measurement.



            This is report back on checking out the new crossover boards built by Jonmarsh- LF, Md, and HF. Design changes served a number of purposes... the Chancellor believed that a second set of eyes and hands might bring some "productivity" and objectivity to this long standing effort...
            • The updated designs reflect an effort to reduce size and expense, and adjust the sensitivity to accommodate an alternate driver for the midrange, the PTT6.5X04-NAA.
            • There was an overall topological update to the midrange crossover, eliminating one of the series caps, and adjusting electrical parameters to hit the target acoustic LR3 response. This has been applied both to the NAA woofer and the 6.5" Purify Midrange driver- parts for the latter just arrived today. Testing today was for the configuration with the NAA woofer used as midrange, in consideration of the claimed low distortion for this aluminum cone driver. The location and configuration of the two notch filters has been adjusted.
            • The LF crossover uses different coils, Jantzen AWG15, with higher DCR than the large AWG10 Solen coils, which lowers the sensitivity in the 60-500 Hz range by about 1.5 dB, but has little impact in the low bass, due to the rising impedance peaking at about 27Hz. The crossover is much smaller and less expensive as a result.
            • In todays, test, the "PURfection" HF crossover was used, and initially tested with the original component values, though system simulation in VituixCAD has already shown the need for a couple of tweaks.
            • The "High Value" HF crossover with minimum component count as been simulated and all the parts recently received; system testing will occur as soon as a POC board can be constructed.
            • One of the purposes for the crossover board size reduction besides lowering cost (for several interested HTG members, including one with a built set of cabinets!) is facilitating locating the crossover boards in the speaker cabinets with output cables at the top of the woofer cabinet connecting to the midrange/tweeter module. This will be attempted and reported on while updating the 2nd woofer cabinet.

            A picture of the crossover boars lined up together, HF at the top, LF at the bottom:


            Click image for larger version  Name:	Crossovers 2-3.jpg Views:	0 Size:	692.7 KB ID:	928473





            Due to the size of the cabinets and CTC distance, measurements today were done at 1-1/2 meters, and at approximately 90 dB output level (checked independently from Fuzzmeasure. Getting these measurements with reasonable low frequency data highlights the challenges with room reflections and acoustic issues like nearby doors leading into other rooms which act at times as out of phase resonators. This highlights the desirability of careful room setup and placement. The resulting comb filtering from early reflections is quite visible in these measurements, compared with near field measurements of the drivers without or with crossovers. However, I can say that what I hear when listening to music from this single cabinet is now reaching my expectations, in spite of the room limitations.


            A reminder- the measured response in cabinet of the PTT6.5X04-NAA- cabinet well out into the room, and under 1M measurement distance:


            Click image for larger version  Name:	PTT6.5X04-NAA.png Views:	0 Size:	176.4 KB ID:	928470



            The main breakup modes are at 5kHz and 10kHz, and can be surpressed with notch filters (even as described in PuriFi application note) at 5kHz (series, last circuit to support distortion reduction) and a parallel notch filter for the 10kHz mode. In this system, it's implemented as a midrange, so additional components are needed.


            This is the POC crossover initially developed in VituixCAD, component values were combined or updated based on available values:



            Click image for larger version  Name:	Isiris VTX2 LR3 TA10-V21 NAA-DriverUpdate-5 XO-schema-1 crop.png Views:	0 Size:	27.1 KB ID:	928471


            For example, C12 and C27 were combined into one part, due to the availability of a 14uF CSA cap, and L4 was raised to 220uH and C21 and C48 combined into a 4.0 uF part. Full documentation updates will be prepared soon.


            This shows a measurement of the midrange driver at 1.5 meters; reflections showing comb filter effects in the response (which are not present near field) and it was also noted that the 5kHz resonance wasn't quite suppressed perfectly, no the 10K, but distortion sweeps didn't show any resonance amplification- as expected, HD2 and HD3 were better than -60dB from the actual output level.

            Click image for larger version  Name:	PTT6.5X04-NAA Mid.png Views:	0 Size:	92.7 KB ID:	928472

            As the tweeter crossover board hand't been updated yet to match the VituixCAD simulations, Mr Marsch expected the output to be high relative to the other drivers, but unfamiliar as I am with some details, I decided it was best to measure first and adjust afterwards at this point.


            Click image for larger version  Name:	Combo First Not adjusted.png Views:	0 Size:	90.7 KB ID:	928474

            As I expected, the HF level above 4 kHz was 2-3 dB high.


            This is the original PUR HF crossover schematic:


            Click image for larger version  Name:	fetch?id=927493&d=1671651800.png Views:	0 Size:	17.1 KB ID:	928475




            As a quick update, C6 was reduced to 15uF, and R34 increased to 6.25 ohms by paralleling two 12.5 ohm resistors.


            The adjusted response then looked like this:

            Click image for larger version  Name:	Combo Last Adjusted Long.png Views:	0 Size:	88.4 KB ID:	928477

            Now, this is still hot in the 5-20kHz area by a dB or two... and here we are again with a slight presence range dip. Not unlike those popular mini-monitors...

            This is the point at which I think I would recommend implementing switches to create options for slight tuning in the level. That said, I listened to a few albums I'm very familiar with, and considering the known polar behavior of the individual drivers, I have to say this curve is quite pleasing to the ear. But fine tuning and evaluation should continue.

            Note, I do have a turntable platform, but this system built in fossilized oak is a bit beyond its capabilities.

            I did do an indoor walk around the room and this gave me a good opportunity to survey the sonics all over the great room area. Albums included the remastered "Best of Fourplay", Jackson Brown's "I'm Alive" and Strunz and Farah "Rio de Colores". I have to say I really did like what I heard, but never trust the builder to critique his own work. As these are for the living room, and acoustic upgrades to the room are not "encouraged" by the wife, I still find I can enjoy these quite a bit for every day listening as is. Vocal rendition is very good, whether Jackson Brown or Stevie Wonder on "Higher Ground" (Fourplay) or the vocalists on "Chant". At 2 meters or more back they don't sound hot, and the off axis rendition is very pleasing. Where I'm testing them is not at all ideal for low frequencies, as I mentioned; two doorways leading into other rooms; the other side of the living room should be better. But I could certainly get perspective on the low frequency performance by walking around, and an apt metaphor might be that the system sounds like a very well designed six inch two way mini monitor well integrated with a articulate, clean and deep sub that doesn't draw attention to itself when it shouldn't.

            I believe many can live with that.

            ​​​​​​​Next up will be building the new midrange board and the "value" budget HF crossover board, and evaluating those in the complete system.

            ​​​​​​​






            Attached Files
            Last edited by Evil Twin; 08 February 2023, 19:16 Wednesday.
            DFAL
            Dark Force Acoustic Labs

            A wholly owned subsidiary of Palpatine Heavy Industries

            Comment

            • Evil Twin
              Super Senior Member
              • Nov 2004
              • 1531

              This measurement set is NULL AND VOID!

              A configuration problem with the test mixer because of poorly documented monitoring setup has been identified, which resulted in feedback causing ripples in the response curve appearing like time domain issues with the signal measurement.




              After more listening evaluations, and consultation with the Chancellor, we have come to the conclusion that further "slicing" and adjustment of component values and full verification of assumptions baed on simulation results is in order before proceeding with the alternative MF midrange crossover development.

              While this recent assessment indicates positive progress, it falls short of the preferred result.


              But I could certainly get perspective on the low frequency performance by walking around, and an apt metaphor might be that the system sounds like a very well designed six inch two way mini monitor well integrated with a articulate, clean and deep sub that doesn't draw attention to itself when it shouldn't.


              Several issues and working concepts should be kept in mind...
              • Develop a more precise understanding and measurement verification of the impact of the higher DCR AWG15 inductors on the measured crossover behavior and audible impact, if any...
              • Evaluate in a definitive matter whether the 4th element (50uF capacitor) as used in the Solen based LF crossovers is necessary or desirable in terms of the measured results for the crossovers using the Jantzen AWG15 inductors; for this previous evaluation, the capacitor was mounted on the crossover board but not connected
              • Engage in a more precise measurement of the midrange level and adjust if needed
              • Correct the measured HF balance which was still slightly tipped up, and evaluate if needed subjectively
              • Compare if there is any subjective difference in the LF performance of the new higher value proposition LF crossover
              • Adjust and update measurement windows and refine technique where needed to examine specific issues
              • Engage in careful comparisons where no level or gain adjustments are used after an initial setting.


              The last measurement from the previous activities shows the issue with HF balance- this was problematic to address due to component supply issues, and it may still be a delaying factor in completing development. This benighted corner of the galaxy is still experience significant supply chain issues...


              Click image for larger version  Name:	fetch?id=928477&d=1675476055.png Views:	42 Size:	88.4 KB ID:	928592

              The first measurement examination is for the AWG15 crossover, without the 50uF shunt element following the 2nd series inductor, and with the 50uF capacitor wired in.



              Click image for larger version  Name:	LF Ref - LF Ref+50uF.png Views:	39 Size:	167.9 KB ID:	928593


              This was measured with the microphone placed between the woofers at 1.5M distance, which is substantially lower than the overall measurement axis or listening height.

              The blue trace is the configuration without 50uF, the purple trace is with the 50uF now connected.


              Click image for larger version  Name:	LF Ref - LF Ref+50uF.png Views:	39 Size:	167.9 KB ID:	928594




              Below 200Hz there is nearly no visible difference, though VituixCAD model predicts there would be some lift in the mid bass. The curve above 200Hz is deemed potentially more desirable, with more complete attenuation but slightly better phase characteristics matching up with the midrange driver

              Next, both Solen inductor boards were measured, as they had used some different brands of capacitors for some the 2nd shunt element and the notch filter.






              Click image for larger version  Name:	Solen 1+2.png Views:	41 Size:	175.2 KB ID:	928595


              The deviation is notable but appears to have no impact on the actual performance of the system, being in a range which is about 50 dB below the nominal output level. There was no measured distortion difference.


              Next, comparative measurements were made with a Solen inductor LF board and the Jantzen AWG15 inductor boards, not touching levels or microphone position, only exchanging the connecting cables for the crossover boards:


              Click image for larger version  Name:	LF Ref+50uF - Solen.png Views:	40 Size:	180.6 KB ID:	928596

              The results are partly as expected- the upper range of the Jantzen board is slightly higher because a 2.3mH inductor was not available, the closest value being 2.0 mH. The lower frequency range of the Solen board was slightly higher, but not nearly in the range predicted by the VituixCAD simulation.


              Moving on to the midrange, I had theorized that instead of two 1 ohm resistors in parallel for the series attenuation for the midrange, I would disconnect one, reducing the midrange level a dB or two, and believing it might be a closer fit to the bass.

              Measured with 1 ohm series resistor:


              Click image for larger version  Name:	LF1 - NAA Series Set to 1 Ohm.png Views:	41 Size:	153.1 KB ID:	928597


              This measurement (mic raised to midway between woofers and mid, at the normal listening height) bore that out.

              1 ohm in series instead of 0.5 ohms it is.

              Note, it looks like the notch filters could be tuned a little sharper, probably individual component Q issues are reducing the impact compared with the VituixCAD simulation, or a basically a non-optimum resistor value. I do not hear anything problematic on a test sweep or with music, but that will get another review at later this week, after more test resistors can be obtained.

              Again, this does not quite agree with VituixCAD. Trust, but verify. Resistor availability is a possible issue, I used 20 Ohms for the notch damper resistor, but 25 might have been better, but was backordered.




              Now, leaving one of the Solen LF boards in place for now, updated full range with long window, the disparity of tweeter level is more apparent after having reduce the midrange level slightly.


              Click image for larger version  Name:	NAA 1Ohm HF 6.2 Ohms full.png Views:	41 Size:	159.1 KB ID:	928598



              To bring that down into a more optimum range, and keeping in mind the directivity of the tweeter off axis and tuning a bit also for power response over a +/- 30 degree angle, I estimated that a 7.5 ohm series resistor might be the right value to replace the effective 6.25 ohm resistor from two 12.5 in parallel. This was also driven by the point that I have some 7.5 on hand from previous builds for other projects. 8 might be even more ideal, but no 8 ohm resistors on hand, and backordered at Parts Express still.


              Click image for larger version  Name:	NAA-HF 7.5 Check Bal 3ms.png Views:	43 Size:	123.0 KB ID:	928599


              This may still be above an optimum level, and will be evaluated once other resistor values are secured.

              A full range test with a long window and abundant reflections...


              Click image for larger version  Name:	HF 7.5 50ms Full speaker.png Views:	40 Size:	157.2 KB ID:	928600
              At this point I hooked back up the Jantzen AWG15 coil LF crossovers, and performed some listening checks. This is definitely a much more satisfactory rendition, closer to what I was looking for. The primary test cuts were from Best of Fourplay album (good percussion, punchy bass, and complex vocals, it’s a recent remaster for SACD version, in this case 2020 CD version) and Ken Mo “Slow down” album.








              A very satisfactory presentation to my ears, and a more balanced one no longer reminiscent of a high performance mini-monitor and sub.


              But I also decided it was necessary to give the Solen "big buck" crossover a listen too, not touching level controls, just swapping out the crossover boards.​


              Based on the measurements, I wasn’t expecting much if any difference, but it was enough to surprise. And possibly to convey why Magico and others spend the big bucks on the pricey crossover components.



              My reluctant conclusion was more impact and articulation in the bottom end. Sounded less like a speaker. Overall balance not all that different, and on some other albums, little impact. But now I’m going to have to look at the internal space carefully on the second cabinet, to see if installing the larger LF crossover in the woofer box is feasible.

              I went back and forth several times, still the same conclusion. Any other constructor of this system may want to engage this process for themselves, to achieve the most appropriate results for their situation and system.

              This is one way in which "sweat equity" is generated...



              Click image for larger version  Name:	Isiris - NAA.jpg Views:	45 Size:	499.0 KB ID:	928601







              Last edited by Evil Twin; 08 February 2023, 19:15 Wednesday.
              DFAL
              Dark Force Acoustic Labs

              A wholly owned subsidiary of Palpatine Heavy Industries

              Comment

              • technodanvan
                Senior Member
                • Nov 2009
                • 998

                Originally posted by Evil Twin
                But now I’m going to have to look at the internal space carefully on the second cabinet, to see if installing the larger LF crossover in the woofer box is feasible.​
                I was just going to say, from the photos in your previous post to the glimpse of the crossover boards hiding behind the speaker in this one, that is a lot of crossover to find space for. Perhaps external boxes and Neutrik connectors are in order...
                - Danny

                Comment

                • Evil Twin
                  Super Senior Member
                  • Nov 2004
                  • 1531

                  The smaller LF crossover and the others could be installed in the LF cabinet, but the larger one is probably pretty much a no go, unless it would fit in the base, based on my checks. It's possible to do one with just AWG12 Solen inductors, probably. But for now, I'll just use the external binding posts that already exist.




                  Click image for larger version

Name:	fetch?id=857417.jpg
Views:	812
Size:	61.8 KB
ID:	928605.
                  DFAL
                  Dark Force Acoustic Labs

                  A wholly owned subsidiary of Palpatine Heavy Industries

                  Comment

                  • Evil Twin
                    Super Senior Member
                    • Nov 2004
                    • 1531

                    While reviewing the recently measured data and curious behavior of Jonmarsh's test system during Force Meditation, I sensed a disturbance in the Force due to what might be a control integrity issue with the CAM system...

                    Click image for larger version  Name:	Meditation Module.jpg Views:	0 Size:	566.0 KB ID:	928612

                    The unusual 60Hz response and the ripples in the measured response and some aberration of the calculated impulse from convolution of the since chirp response suggested the possibility of a signal feedback loop at higher output test levels... perhaps due to cross feed between the measurement channels.


                    A brief investigation today uncovered exactly this problem, partially due to a poorly documented monitoring control setup which could allow cross feed of both channels with repetitive presses of the monitor button...


                    Some of the previous example measurements were repeated, and the results are shown here... and comply closely to rational expectations.



                    LF output with Solen equipped Crossover


                    Click image for larger version  Name:	LF Solen Check SS.png Views:	0 Size:	80.5 KB ID:	928613




                    NAA Midrange output with recent component updates


                    Click image for larger version  Name:	NAA Sweep Check Update SS.png Views:	0 Size:	90.3 KB ID:	928614






                    ​​​​​​​Full spectrum Test at 1.5M


                    Click image for larger version  Name:	Isiris Full range 1.5M SS.png Views:	0 Size:	91.1 KB ID:	928615​​​​​​​






                    These results appear to be most satisfactory....



                    Of course, these events and outcome might suggest a lesson to be learned from this story...

                    Never send a moderator to do a Sith Lord's job...














                    DFAL
                    Dark Force Acoustic Labs

                    A wholly owned subsidiary of Palpatine Heavy Industries

                    Comment

                    • Evil Twin
                      Super Senior Member
                      • Nov 2004
                      • 1531

                      A couple of component updates on the midrange notch filter, and some additional LF and full range measurements.


                      Measurement of NAA Midrange with distortion


                      Click image for larger version

Name:	NAA V6 Update DIsto.png
Views:	792
Size:	142.1 KB
ID:	928617



                      Comparison of levels for LF crossovers using AWG15 (Jantzen) and AWG10 (Solen) inductors

                      Click image for larger version

Name:	Solen-Jantzen Comp.png
Views:	751
Size:	97.4 KB
ID:	928618




                      Full range measurement with Jantzen Crossover


                      Click image for larger version

Name:	Jantzen LF Full Range HH.png
Views:	738
Size:	89.4 KB
ID:	928619




                      Full range measurement with Solen Crossover



                      Click image for larger version

Name:	Solen Xover SPL HH.png
Views:	731
Size:	90.3 KB
ID:	928620








                      DFAL
                      Dark Force Acoustic Labs

                      A wholly owned subsidiary of Palpatine Heavy Industries

                      Comment

                      • Evil Twin
                        Super Senior Member
                        • Nov 2004
                        • 1531

                        The crossover testing and adjustment for the PTT6.5 MF midrange driver has been completed, with most satisfactory results, especially considering a very deliberate effort to minimize the financial outlay for components and simplify the topological structure.

                        Full success for the stated goals is within our grasp...

                        Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4142.gif
Views:	713
Size:	637.7 KB
ID:	928768




                        A detailed summary report of this project effort to date will be prepared in the form of an "article" and published in the Articles section, along with schematics and measurement results.

                        To celebrate this milestone, I made a purchase from HD Tracks of the frequent evaluation album, "Fourplay 2020 remaster Greatest Hits" in 24/192 format for Mr. Marsh.


                        As a "hint", I present this measurement result in room with a very long gating window but 1/3 octave smoothing, as regards the overall balance and response. This is for the "value" version crossover using the PTT6.5M04-NFA-01 driver. with 250Hz and 1800Hz crossover points in LR3. All drivers connected in positive polarity.


                        Click image for larger version

Name:	Jantzen LF-MF-HF Value updated SMOOTH.png
Views:	713
Size:	113.4 KB
ID:	928769

                        The subjective results on a small selection of albums was most satisfactory...

                        DFAL
                        Dark Force Acoustic Labs

                        A wholly owned subsidiary of Palpatine Heavy Industries

                        Comment

                        • Jonasz
                          Senior Member
                          • Nov 2004
                          • 852

                          Wich tweeter is used? Do you like the mf version better than the alu-midbass?

                          Comment

                          • technodanvan
                            Senior Member
                            • Nov 2009
                            • 998

                            Originally posted by Evil Twin

                            The subjective results on a small selection of albums was most satisfactory...
                            Was this using the inline filter we've talked about previously?
                            - Danny

                            Comment

                            • Evil Twin
                              Super Senior Member
                              • Nov 2004
                              • 1531

                              All of the current tests are with the TB34B-4 tweeter.

                              At this time, we will prepare another version of the NAA crossover, moving the upper crossover point down from 2250 (as both were originally designed) to 1800Hz, and may test it with the "value" version of the HF crossover, and probably prepare a modified version of the PURfectionist crossover with an 1800Hz crossover point.

                              The MF version was better subjectively than expected with the "value" build crossover; I plan to investigate whether this is due to an advantage in off axis polar behavior. The data sheets do not indicate any such thing clearly. Of course, reducing the crossover frequency for the NAA version may change that.

                              ​​​​​​​The NAA version has lower measured distortion- in reality as well as the data sheet, but both are well beyond the capabilities of more "typical" drivers.

                              ​​​​​​​The test cabinet will also be moved to a location in the great room that will likely be more "neutral" in the mid bass and on down, without nearby room doors creating a bass trap and variable boundary characteristic.

                              ​​​​​​​I am also seriously considering giving the crossovers a "subtle" switches level capability for midrange and treble in order to produce a relatively neutral presentation whether fairly close to a wall boundary or out into the room- this will require on the order of a 2dB step, based on current measurements.

                              At this time, there is no inline filter employed- the intent is to "tune" close to flat on axis, and let inline preamp modifications or subtle crossover switches modify the response from that point.








                              DFAL
                              Dark Force Acoustic Labs

                              A wholly owned subsidiary of Palpatine Heavy Industries

                              Comment

                              • suraj357
                                Junior Member
                                • Feb 2023
                                • 1

                                plz tell me 3 d desine of tarkus crossover

                                Comment

                                • Efalegalo
                                  Senior Member
                                  • Jan 2007
                                  • 139

                                  Originally posted by Evil Twin

                                  At this time, there is no inline filter employed- the intent is to "tune" close to flat on axis, and let inline preamp modifications or subtle crossover switches modify the response from that point.
                                  [/FONT]
                                  My vote is for the subtle crossover switches :-)

                                  Comment

                                  • Evil Twin
                                    Super Senior Member
                                    • Nov 2004
                                    • 1531

                                    Originally posted by suraj357
                                    plz tell me 3 d desine of tarkus crossover
                                    Could you clarify the meaning and intent of your question? At first glance, it does not seem related to this topic discussion.
                                    DFAL
                                    Dark Force Acoustic Labs

                                    A wholly owned subsidiary of Palpatine Heavy Industries

                                    Comment

                                    • Evil Twin
                                      Super Senior Member
                                      • Nov 2004
                                      • 1531

                                      This is a "brief" update with key information- the full working schematic and BOM of the existing build, which could see small tweaks, but this may be up to individual interested builders- the result seems quite satisfactory in general at this time.

                                      This is for the version using the PTT6.5M04-NFA midrange driver- an alternative configuration has been developed in parallel but for now that effort is set aside, including because there is another project under consideration which may use the two samples I have on hand.

                                      System Schematic:

                                      Click image for larger version  Name:	Isiris March 2023 Schematic Update.png Views:	0 Size:	627.9 KB ID:	930364



                                      System BOM


                                      PDF format is attached to this post.


                                      Click image for larger version  Name:	BOM-2023 Isiris Update PTT6.5MF.png Views:	0 Size:	1.68 MB ID:	930365




                                      Midrange only Plot focusing on cone resonance compensation networks performance



                                      Click image for larger version  Name:	1_PTT6.5M04 Mid only Top Check.png Views:	0 Size:	119.3 KB ID:	930366



                                      Mid + HF combined



                                      Click image for larger version  Name:	2_6.5MF+10 DesignAxis 2m.png Views:	12 Size:	115.7 KB ID:	930371






                                      Mid + HF combined- vertical height impacts degree and shape of Reverse Null
                                      Impulse response still shows room reflections in this measurement




                                      Click image for larger version  Name:	3_DesignAxis 6.5MF RevNull.png Views:	0 Size:	117.4 KB ID:	930368




                                      Full Range with Jantzen AWG15 inductors- switches set for ~ -2dB on mid and tweeter



                                      Click image for larger version  Name:	4_JNTZN 6.5MF +10 2M 1-24th.png Views:	0 Size:	118.1 KB ID:	930369




                                      Full range with Solen inductor LF crossover - longer gating window, more reflections and room issues. 10 ft from rear wall.



                                      Click image for larger version  Name:	5_Solen 6.5MF +10 2M 1-24th.png Views:	0 Size:	156.9 KB ID:	930370


















                                      Attached Files
                                      Last edited by Evil Twin; 21 March 2023, 16:59 Tuesday.
                                      DFAL
                                      Dark Force Acoustic Labs

                                      A wholly owned subsidiary of Palpatine Heavy Industries

                                      Comment


                                      • Evil Twin
                                        Evil Twin commented
                                        Editing a comment
                                        Note: This BOM was developed for what is hoped to be the best compromise between cost and performance- total cost ~ $1200

                                      • Evil Twin
                                        Evil Twin commented
                                        Editing a comment
                                        Dhar calculated that his total build cost buying "new" drivers second hand with this BOM, and with his rough estimate on the cabinet costs, the total comes to about $3500 with this crossover design and BOM.
                                    • duvixan
                                      Member
                                      • Sep 2012
                                      • 55

                                      Purifi has a prototype PTT33 Alu tweeter in the works, fyi...

                                      Comment

                                      • JonMarsh
                                        Mad Max Moderator
                                        • Aug 2000
                                        • 15261

                                        Yes, I read this article a few weeks ago. Shame that it's a bit outside the range of even an advanced DIY effort- these aren't "freeware" tools" (go price out COMSOL and MatLAB- I have the latter) and this is a serious unified engineering effort. Hat's off to PuriFi and for sharing it.

                                        A MATLAB GUI was written for the optimisation. A netlist of the crossover is input and compiled into equations. Next we import a baffle step simulated in COMSOL using a 3D model of the box and woofer. The Matlab model combines the PR box model with the blocked impedance model and the xover network to give the response form the amplifier voltage input to the SPL output of the box. The SPL is corrected for the baffle step.


                                        Let's take that very brief and unassuming first sentence- if you've never done this, the way they state this makes it sound like something you can whip out between your morning coffee break and lunch time. That's just not the case.
                                        Having championed and commissioned the effort to create a custom MatLAB GUI tool for designing LLC resonant converters using true time domain analysis, and developed advanced SIMPLIS models including accurate time domain magnetics simulation, let me just say this is not a walk in the park. Our goal was to develop an LLC analysis tool based on discrete time domain analysis, not the commonly used FHA (First Harmonic Approximation) approach, which is much like linear loudspeaker circuit analysis, and very inaccurate once you move away from the resonant frequency and need to predict gain and RMS operating currents. In the end we enlisted a consultant organization in the Netherlands, and were able to model the LLC converter accurately based on time domain analysis as described back in 2001 by James Lazar and Robert Martinelli- as I like to joke with colleagues, folks didn't go with this approach because the math was too challenging, but it's the only accurate way to do it.

                                        Click image for larger version

Name:	LLC MatLAB.png
Views:	353
Size:	1.67 MB
ID:	938517


                                        See the PDF attachment for their paper.



                                        Steady State Analysis of LLC Best Quality.pdf

                                        Then I created an XL tool with accompanying rules of thumb for a simplified design definition approach, then LT SPICE verification situations, which while not as in depth as the SIMPLIS versions, could be accessed with the free LT-SPICE simulator, and which included synchronous rectification for the output stage. This illustration incorporates the key elements in the model schematic as an aid to understanding and usage. I'm still getting direct requests for this model from internal people at my former employer and from end customers.

                                        Click image for larger version

Name:	LT-SPICE LLC.png
Views:	395
Size:	3.27 MB
ID:	938519

                                        Back to the PuriFi paper-

                                        One could go through this paragraph by paragraph and comment on various issues identified, but I would remark that a perhaps surprising number can and have been identified and addressed simply using VituixCAD, such as driver impedance interactions with crossover network- this is key for this, project, the update to the Isiris, and to the CC Supreme center channel, which actually uses impedance control zobel networks to assure the intended LF response but also to adjust the response level.

                                        The enclosure modeling is another matter- one might say that for the enclosure development, the most sure path available for the DIY folks is simple brutal overkill with construction materials (maple ply, specialized bamboo materials, for example, like this Isiris build) and caution, and rigorous testing.

                                        The optimization process for the HF level is particularly challenging for the DIY designer, as few have the insight based on an understanding of compression driver and horn throat design to scale this to a shallow waveguide- (heck, most of the companies making those products don't have that- folks like EighteenSound seem to be an exception) in many cases, the best the DIY person can do is experimentation in hardware of the waveguide throat profile and use of tweeters with an integral phase shield or adding this in a 3D printed waveguide structure. The few waveguide efforts I've published have been very focused on consistent directivity up to a minimum of 15kHz, which does take a very optimized approach to interfacing the tweeter/driver to the overall waveguide. And assumptions/tools for waveguide design which use a flat diaphragm model won't get there.

                                        There is little information in this paper, unfortunately, about the actual tweeter design motor and specs, but with the thoroughness of their general approach I would expect it to be fairly exceptional- the interesting question might be whether they offer a "conventional" panel mount build to OEM's or DIY, or only the integrated waveguide with coherer, as they term it. I wouldn't be surprised if the latter may be the case.

                                        In either case, I'm certainly looking forward to seeing what they do....

                                        OTOH, of late, I seem to be moving away from dome tweeters... not a particularly conscious decision, just the result of a lot of recent component evaluations and design work.







                                        the AudioWorx
                                        Natalie P
                                        M8ta
                                        Modula Neo DCC
                                        Modula MT XE
                                        Modula Xtreme
                                        Isiris
                                        Wavecor Ardent

                                        SMJ
                                        Minerva Monitor
                                        Calliope
                                        Ardent D

                                        In Development...
                                        Isiris Mk II updates- in final test stage!
                                        Obi-Wan
                                        Saint-Saëns Symphonique/AKA SMJ-40
                                        Modula PWB
                                        Calliope CC Supreme
                                        Natalie P Ultra
                                        Natalie P Supreme
                                        Janus BP1 Sub


                                        Resistance is not futile, it is Volts divided by Amperes...
                                        Just ask Mr. Ohm....

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        😀
                                        😂
                                        🥰
                                        😘
                                        🤢
                                        😎
                                        😞
                                        😡
                                        👍
                                        👎
                                        Searching...Please wait.
                                        An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

                                        Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                                        An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

                                        Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                                        An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
                                        There are no results that meet this criteria.
                                        Search Result for "|||"