HI All,
I originally posted this in the thread concerning 805S dedicated stands in the B&W forum where the logic of buying these perceived expensive stands was being questioned and I was defending the stands and an ideal. But then I thought my views on the issue might have more legs as a separate thread.
I think appearance is very important in fine audio systems. I love the looks of so much hi fi equipment I have seen over the years. Some are down right exotic, other worldly. Others are works of industrial art; sculpture; witness almost all Bang & Olufson (sp?) products, the Nakamichi Dragon, and the current Classe line. Beautiful, IMHO. There are many others.
I am definitely swayed by a products looks. So, here is the question must come up at some point. Is appearance more, or equally, important than sonic performance? CLEARLY, THE ANSWER HAS TO BE NO!! Did I say that loud enough? Are we clear on this point? Good! Consequently, if I have to pay a little more to get both, I'll usually do it.
Honestly, my still new B&W 805S's in black ash on the black dedicated B&W stands truly is ART. Each apart is nice but together they make me smile when I look at them. They also sound good. I do know what good is.
I enjoy, like many others do on this forum, to not only put together a fine sounding audio system but one that is functionally and visually beatiful. But there's much more. The system setting, the equipment racks, the sub's, the lighting, the furnature, the rug's, and more all can serve the individuals personal vision of their liistening/watching experience. Just go through the picture gallery. A lot of people love the beauty of their systems and rooms and are willing to pay for it. I honor them.
For me, having both beauty and high performance is the name of the game.
I make no apologies.
Sparky
I originally posted this in the thread concerning 805S dedicated stands in the B&W forum where the logic of buying these perceived expensive stands was being questioned and I was defending the stands and an ideal. But then I thought my views on the issue might have more legs as a separate thread.
I think appearance is very important in fine audio systems. I love the looks of so much hi fi equipment I have seen over the years. Some are down right exotic, other worldly. Others are works of industrial art; sculpture; witness almost all Bang & Olufson (sp?) products, the Nakamichi Dragon, and the current Classe line. Beautiful, IMHO. There are many others.
I am definitely swayed by a products looks. So, here is the question must come up at some point. Is appearance more, or equally, important than sonic performance? CLEARLY, THE ANSWER HAS TO BE NO!! Did I say that loud enough? Are we clear on this point? Good! Consequently, if I have to pay a little more to get both, I'll usually do it.
Honestly, my still new B&W 805S's in black ash on the black dedicated B&W stands truly is ART. Each apart is nice but together they make me smile when I look at them. They also sound good. I do know what good is.
I enjoy, like many others do on this forum, to not only put together a fine sounding audio system but one that is functionally and visually beatiful. But there's much more. The system setting, the equipment racks, the sub's, the lighting, the furnature, the rug's, and more all can serve the individuals personal vision of their liistening/watching experience. Just go through the picture gallery. A lot of people love the beauty of their systems and rooms and are willing to pay for it. I honor them.
For me, having both beauty and high performance is the name of the game.
I make no apologies.
Sparky
Comment