I know I shouldn't of asked lol....
Good CD Player
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Originally posted by joetamawhat type of cables are you running with this CD player?
Van den Hul - "D102 III Hybrid" 1m pair between the pre & power amps.
Straight Wire - "Encore II" bi wire speaker cables.
BTW,... the analogue output level of the Arcam is slightly higher than that of most comparitively priced players, just thought you should be aware of that. Not a bad thing in itself... just explains away alot of the "magic" that makes it sound (subjectively) so much more "dynamic", clearer etc... when directly compared in a A/B scenario at matched amp levels.
A "cunning trick" clearly intended by the manufacturers to produce the WOW! effect in just such a A/B situation. As I said, it's important with this player to get past the first impression and take a bit of time to let it settle on you... it's a superb player (easily one of the best available for this price), so I'm not trying to put you off buying one at all... just saying (like the first post) consider the impact on your system carefully, just to double check that you still like it as much after continued exposure.
I'm sure that having a demo at home for a few days (if you can) will really give you a balanced picture.- Bottom
Comment
-
If one is matching levels to evaluate components, one should match voltage at the speakers, I'd think.
It would seem to do no good to level match amps (e.g. calibrate multiple amps so 1V in = 10V out) if you are going to drive them with components having different signal output levels.
The cunning trick should be nullifed in a proper level matching scenario. :TThere are some things which are impossible to know, but it is impossible to know which things these are. :scratchhead:
----JAFFE'S PRECEPT- Bottom
Comment
-
So I purchased the Arcam CD73 today. Listened to it for about and hour then to the Rotel 1072 for about an hour then the Classe (just for fun) then back over the other two quickly. (Good thing my buddy works at the shop lol) The Arcam is definatly a better sounding player to my ears. I enjoyed it a lot. Looking forward to getting it home ....-Joe- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by joetamaSo I purchased the Arcam CD73 today. Listened to it for about and hour then to the Rotel 1072 for about an hour then the Classe (just for fun) then back over the other two quickly. (Good thing my buddy works at the shop lol) The Arcam is definatly a better sounding player to my ears. I enjoyed it a lot. Looking forward to getting it home ....- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by IndytownI have had the Arcam CD 33 for several years and love it. I have just upgraded to the MCD 201 from MAC; much better in detail retrival, bass reproduction and has a Class "A'' amp sound to it if you know what I mean.
But the MCD201 is sure sweet- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by jim777Oh yeah, I love mine. Upgraded from the 1072 to the 201. However we are not in the proposed 500-1k budget anymore!! In that range I recommend the 1072, the Rega Apollo or a DAC1.
But the MCD201 is sure sweet- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by BTBHi Joetama
I have a Arcam CD 73 T. It's a good player, but I might be changing it soon.
After many months I am now willing to admit (to myself) that my system is simply too bright. Thing is, my previous system was a little too soft for my liking, so I guess in a way I was attracted to the "sharp focus" of my current set-up (and the Arcam in particular) as a reaction to the things that frustrated me about the system before.
Just for the record...I'm not saying that the Arcam is solely to blame for the brightness... I might well be changing my CD player or amps (Rotel 10 series at present) or speakers (B&W 704's), whatever sounds best based on home audition, to get the balance better.
Just something you said in a previous post got me thinking... I too fell for the Arcam because of it's "dynamics" and "detail resolution": both aspects do sound really exciting when doing a relatively short A/B against another player, but unless you match carefully, I fear that you might end up with something that isn't such a great long term listen.
That said, (with careful matching) as a relatively inexpensive single disc player it'll run rings around a Rotel 1072 in terms of soundstage width and (the aforementioned) detail resolution (and general involvement factor), and I'd still rather own the Arcam than either the Rotel or a NAD (I tried a 521BEE & 542) you mentioned you had tried, for this kind of money.
I guess I'm simply saying that you should realise that some of the qualities that you like about the Arcam at present, could, in effect, become the very things you hate about it months from now. So do consider it's impact as it relates to the rest of your system.- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by IndytownI would think that amp, speaker and pre amp synergy should be addressed first.- Bottom
Comment
-
Wow I am going to get flamed for this one.....But I thought it made a serious difference.
I demoed the CD player with and without the Nordost Blue Heaven Cables. With out, I definatly heard that brightness that was a bit over powering, but with it was much warmer and fuller. The high was not as harsh and the bass responce filled in much better around it.
I am getting out the burn cream now for when I get totally flamed for saying that.....-Joe- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by joetamaI am getting out the burn cream now for when I get totally flamed for saying that.....
Personally I think this player is very responsive to cable changes.
Anyway, I'm not spoiling for a "let's have another useless, subjective debate" scenario here, just as an owner of the same CDP I can share your experience.- Bottom
Comment
-
Time for a new question... Instead of making a new thread I'll just bump this one...
I've had the Arcam for a year now and LOVE IT! It is a wonderful player.
However, I have read/heard that Arcam CD73 CD Players are upgradeable... You guys know anything about that?-Joe- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by joetamaTime for a new question... Instead of making a new thread I'll just bump this one...
I've had the Arcam for a year now and LOVE IT! It is a wonderful player.
However, I have read/heard that Arcam CD73 CD Players are upgradeable... You guys know anything about that?
Yep, you can upgrade the CD73 to the CD192 spec. my buddy did it. It has to be done via your dealer - not DIY. It cost about €700 or STG£500.Vincent.
I don't want the world. I just want your half.- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by joetamaWhat is that in USD?
Did he see a big improvement?
He did. Quite a bit too. We demod in the shop before we left for home and on a side by side with an original CD192, it produced an identical sound. It was hooked up to a pait on 802ds and a Classe amp and was stunning. The CD73 he had in the shop when hooked up after, while fast and exciting, like you'd expect, was now not as crisp, clear and smooth as the CD192. I did not get to listen a/b at his place - given the CD73 was no more. He since upgrade his speakers as he said the upgraded player was now a bit harsh with HFs. He had B&W 705s and now got a pair of 805s and apparently all is well with the world - they work well with the player.Vincent.
I don't want the world. I just want your half.- Bottom
Comment
Comment