Originally posted by sikoniko
Official SSP-800 Owners Thread
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
James,
Don't be too skeptical about the break-in period with the SSP-800. Give it a few months and I'll bet the sound becomes much warmer.
I know that some "expert" opinions view the break-in period merely as a period of time that the listener's ears "adjust" to the new sound. I used to think that as well, but I now disagree with that theory.
I vividly remember my McIntosh gear sounding rather clinical and dry right out of the box (you may recall my state of panic as well :lol: ). Several months later I was amazed at how much fuller and warmer the sound was (is). I am convinced that there was a significant improvement.
It made a believer out of me reference electronics break-in periods. :T
Neil- Bottom
-
Originally posted by GumpDon't be too skeptical about the break-in period with the SSP-800. Give it a few months and I'll bet the sound becomes much warmer.
I know that some "expert" opinions view the break-in period merely as a period of time that the listener's ears "adjust" to the new sound. I used to think that as well, but I now disagree with that theory.
Its hard to say about the SSP-800. I think there will be a combination of break-in period and adjusting to the change. It is the same but different.
Most systems have a tone, or color to them. The ssp-300 and 600 could be considered warm, perhaps somewhat tube-like. The SSP-800 is not really warm. It is transparent to the degree of believability. I watched the first half of U-571 (hddvd - 96k DTS track) last night and I really got the feeling that I was on or in a sub. Rain, thunder, rocking of the sub in the ocean as the waves hit across the bow and every other sound was incredibly realistic. Surrounds panned seemlessly around me, enveloping me in the movie.
This proc is something special. I had an opportunity to hear it in June in Seattle, and that time did not prepare me for what I would have at home. Arguably, some could say that the system at Definitive was better than mine, but I think I am getting more from the 800 now then I did then.I'm just sittin here watchin the wheels go round and round...- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by sikoniko
It is transparent to the degree of believability.
I assume that the SSP-800 you heard in Seattle was already well broken-in and now that you have your own you are certainly in a perfect position to evaluate the 800's sound character.
Transparency and believability are certainly great attributes, but I'm a little worried about the missing "warm, tube-like" sound that I consider to be a Classe trait.
Linn electronics are extremely detailed and transparent. I'm curious if the ex-Linn engineer (don't recall his name) that worked on the SSP-800 might have something to do with the change in the Classe signature sound. Just speculation and it doesn't really matter in the long run. I know a Linn fanatic that always criticized Classe for being too warm and lacking transparency.
Maybe Classe reached a happy medium with the SSP-800 that gives us the best of both worlds....that would be nice :T. Only time will tell...
I still am looking forward to hearing what you and James think about the SSP-800's sound in a month or two when it's "settled in" a bit.
Maybe I'll be joining you.... 8)
Neil- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by GumpHi sikoniko,
I assume that the SSP-800 you heard in Seattle was already well broken-in and now that you have your own you are certainly in a perfect position to evaluate the 800's sound character.
Transparency and believability are certainly great attributes, but I'm a little worried about the missing "warm, tube-like" sound that I consider to be a Classe trait.
Linn electronics is extremely detailed and transparent. I'm curious if the ex-Linn engineer (don't recall his name) that worked on the SSP-800 might have something to do with the change in the Classe signature sound. Just speculation and it doesn't really matter in the long run. I know a Linn fanatic that always criticized Classe for being too warm and lacking transparency.
Maybe Classe reached a happy medium with the SSP-800 that gives us the best of both worlds....that would be nice :T. Only time will tell...
NeilI'm just sittin here watchin the wheels go round and round...- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by GumpTransparency and believability are certainly great attributes, but I'm a little worried about the missing "warm, tube-like" sound that I consider to be a Classe trait."Dream as if you'll live forever. Live as if you'll die today."- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by sikonikoWell, to be honest, I got to hear the proc in seattle a couple hours after it was pulled from the box. I had a few hours to myself the day before the "event" occurred.
James and I are comparing notes on our observations.
I know you guys are Classe Veterans that know what your doing, but I just can't help believing, based on my own experience, that the break-in time is significant to how that processor will ultimately sound. It will get better! :T- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by sikonikoJames and I are comparing notes on our observations. It is definately unexpected to say the least what we are finding. I wouldn't go so far as to say it isn't the classe sound. But it is slightly different."Dream as if you'll live forever. Live as if you'll die today."- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by RebelManI To me the SSP-800 thirsts for the highest quality sources possible and will make them shine as in the case of my Rumors DVD-A. I will be keeping an open mind (per your recommendation) on the break-in period and I hope with more time that the SSP-800 warms up but not if it means a loss of transparency in the process. I am enjoying this new trait too much. :P
Does it seem that the SSP-800 is not all that it was supposed to be?
That would be a disappointment:cry:
I heard that Classé suggested 400h break-in period that would mean, you could turn it on in the morning at 7:00 am leaving for work and turning it off in the evening going to bed :Z at 23:00! That translate into only 25 days 16h/day worth doing!Farming looks mighty easy when your plow is a pencil, and you're a thousand miles from the corn field."Dwight D. Eisenhower- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by wettouHello James
Does it seem that the SSP-800 is not all that it was supposed to be?
That would be a disappointment:cry:"Dream as if you'll live forever. Live as if you'll die today."- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by RebelManNot at all. In fact it's quite strange. I have been so enamored by the 2CH abilities of the SSP-800 that I find myself in no hurry to try MCH cinema sources, which going into this I thought I would have been more anxious for. I have no disappointment but it is a little unexpected of a Classe' product to be this revealing. Bryston is revered for the transparency they breed into their products and if you've done your homework you'll know that I have great admiration for the company and their hardware. The SSP-800 is the first of its kind to equal if not better the neutrality I find in Bryston.
Do you have SACD Multichannel?Farming looks mighty easy when your plow is a pencil, and you're a thousand miles from the corn field."Dwight D. Eisenhower- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by wettouDo you have SACD Multichannel?"Dream as if you'll live forever. Live as if you'll die today."- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by RebelManIn my PS3 but its a little noisy. I don't have any SACD discs but I am thinking about (Nora Jones) what to do about it. I never felt the need before. :W
One of the requirements of SACD releases, as set forth by Sony and Phillips, is that there be at least an SACD (DSD) stereo layer. The surround DSD and hybrid Red Book PCM CD compatible layers are optional. As the previous reviewer mentioned, the stereo DSD layer on this release was taken from the Red Book 16/44.1 PCM master used to make the CD layer. So Blue Note skirted a basic requirement of the format they were releasing on by deceptively scamming consumers into thinking they were getting a true SACD. As far as anyone knows, however, the surround SACD layer was taken directly from the 2 inch multitrack and sampled to DSD, then remixed and mastered to the SACD surround layer. I haven't heard anything to the contrary. As it stands right now, I agree with Fremer that Blue Note should simply apologize, pull the current release, rerelease a proper SACD, and give past purchasers a free exchange.I'm just sittin here watchin the wheels go round and round...- Bottom
Comment
-
Bob James ...
Originally posted by RebelManHmm, one of my favorite groups is about to release a new cut on SACD. Maybe this is a sign?"If 'A' equals success, then the formula is 'A = _ X + Y + Z.' 'X' is work. 'Y' is play. 'Z' is keeping your mouth shut." -- Albert Einstein- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by sikonikoNeil,
Its hard to say about the SSP-800. I think there will be a combination of break-in period and adjusting to the change. It is the same but different.
Most systems have a tone, or color to them. The ssp-300 and 600 could be considered warm, perhaps somewhat tube-like. The SSP-800 is not really warm. It is transparent to the degree of believability. I watched the first half of U-571 (hddvd - 96k DTS track) last night and I really got the feeling that I was on or in a sub. Rain, thunder, rocking of the sub in the ocean as the waves hit across the bow and every other sound was incredibly realistic. Surrounds panned seemlessly around me, enveloping me in the movie.
This proc is something special. I had an opportunity to hear it in June in Seattle, and that time did not prepare me for what I would have at home. Arguably, some could say that the system at Definitive was better than mine, but I think I am getting more from the 800 now then I did then.
OK, I finished watching the movie. Outside of the clarity, I wanted to comment on the Proc.
There are different levels of surround sound proc/receivers. What seperates them is how well they do surround sound. I know that sounds weird but think about it. Have you had your system setup and watching a movie and wondered if anything was actually coming from your surround speakers? You found the front sound stage so involved and dynamic, but lackluster performance around you? That is what I mean. That is what seperates a good surround sound processor from a bad one.
When it comes to the SSP-800, it excels at surround. The most subtle nuances are represented in a very believable way. There are scenes where the crew is talking in the hull of the sub, and I hear water leaking into the ship from behind me. The best word I can think of to sum it all up is immersive.
The SSP-800 is by far the most immersive SSP I have heard to date. It is clean, clear, accurate, quick, 0 background noise, and immersive.
I have a 7.1 system, and at this time am only able to play back hi-res in 5.1. The SSP-800 system makes 5.1 sound so dynamic, I can't tell that my rear speakers are not playing. (7.1 playback is fixed for production release, just not pre-production models). The SSP will make a 5.1 system excel to the point of making a 7.1 system possibly unnecessary.I'm just sittin here watchin the wheels go round and round...- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by sikoniko
The SSP-800 is by far the most immersive SSP I have heard to date. It is clean, clear, accurate, quick, 0 background noise, and immersive.
A little bit of the Linn flavor mixed in with the traditional Classe sound would make for an awsome combination....Sounds like a winner! :td:- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by RebelManHmm, one of my favorite groups is about to release a new cut on SACD. Maybe this is a sign?
The ratings are very useful, I am curious to hear your perspective with SACD and Classé SSP-800Farming looks mighty easy when your plow is a pencil, and you're a thousand miles from the corn field."Dwight D. Eisenhower- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by RebelManI think "tube like" is an overused and abused description. Tubes and transistors done right should sound identical but in many cases the designers of tube based equipment will deliberately color the sound to taste. I don't think the designers of the CP-700 had similar intentions but the engineering that went into it does make the pre-amplifier more forgiving of the source material than the SSP-800. To me the SSP-800 thirsts for the highest quality sources possible and will make them shine as in the case of my Rumors DVD-A. I will be keeping an open mind (per your recommendation) on the break-in period and I hope with more time that the SSP-800 warms up but not if it means a loss of transparency in the process. I am enjoying this new trait too much. :P
IMO a sense of transparency comes from balancing the extraction of detail against listenibility. Push it too far and the piece goes from transparent to analytical. It's one thing to find a component that makes you want to see how much better hi-rez will be, and it's another altogether to feel all you can listen to are the best recordings. Where does the SSP-800 fall into this equation so far?
I have Revel Ultima2's and they are already revealing to the point that they border on the analytical. I was hoping to balance this against the "warm tube like" sound of the Classe.
I would also like to mention that I have had a different experience with well designed tube gear vs solid state than what you have described. Bad tube gear has its faults as does bad SS, but the best of both still sound quite different IME. For instance, I recently listened to a fully tubed Audio Research front-end connected to a pair of Watt Puppies, and Oh My God! it was phenominal! Super expansive, lush, and immaculately detailed but in a completely natural and listenable way. Much closer to "real" than any SS gear I have heard, but I admit that my exposure is limited and I haven't heard the Omega line of amps yet.
Off topic a bit, but I see in your profile that you have both the CAM400's and the CA5100. I'm torn as to whether to go with the CAM's for 2CH or just the 2200, with a separate 3200 for 5.1. What sort of improvements are gained by stepping up to the CAMs?
Cheers,
- Tim- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by AV-OCDAs someone that was turning to Classe to get away from the dry, revealing nature of my Lexicon MC-12HD, your comment about the SSP-800 being "less forgiving" has me concerned. I listen to plenty of imperfect recordings and I was hoping to tame the edge and digititus I hear on these.
IMO a sense of transparency comes from balancing the extraction of detail against listenibility. Push it too far and the piece goes from transparent to analytical. It's one thing to find a component that makes you want to see how much better hi-rez will be, and it's another altogether to feel all you can listen to are the best recordings. Where does the SSP-800 fall into this equation so far? - TimI'm just sittin here watchin the wheels go round and round...- Bottom
Comment
-
Hi,
Question over Classe..not the SSP but CA5200:
The manual say 300hours the have the best rom the ampli....(stand-by is valid too?)
After running the 300 hours you have heard a difference?
(audible from a MAN? - not machine?)
For the SSP800 the running time is so important like in one ampli or is the same? (power ampli will delivery the sound, ok the ssp make a great job, but if the input is no good don't can make/do its work OR?!)
thanks Omar- Bottom
Comment
-
My dealer tells me that he should take delivery of my SSP 800 1 week from now. Having said that, I'm not sure which Classe CD player would work best with the new SSP. Will the CDP 202 do a better job of conversion than the SSP 800? If the DACs on the SSP will be used instead of the DACs in the CD player, will any old transport ultimately produce the same sound?- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by ShakespeareMy dealer tells me that he should take delivery of my SSP 800 1 week from now. Having said that, I'm not sure which Classe CD player would work best with the new SSP. Will the CDP 202 do a better job of conversion than the SSP 800? If the DACs on the SSP will be used instead of the DACs in the CD player, will any old transport ultimately produce the same sound?
Good question before throwing 7000 for the cdp202
cdp102? cdt-300? Same results with ssp-800?
Rebelman, do you still have anything to compare to cdp-202? I know you did a comparison between cdt-300 and cdp-202 but well.. with the ssp-800, would be interesting to hear any comments
Thanks- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by styleHi,
Question over Classe..not the SSP but CA5200:
The manual say 300hours the have the best rom the ampli....(stand-by is valid too?)
After running the 300 hours you have heard a difference?
(audible from a MAN? - not machine?)
For the SSP800 the running time is so important like in one ampli or is the same? (power ampli will delivery the sound, ok the ssp make a great job, but if the input is no good don't can make/do its work OR?!)
thanks Omar
I also had changed out the dealers 2200 for mine as he loaned me his as well and could hear an audible difference between the new and the used one.
I have every plan on upgrading to the 800 in a year or so when they have the new board in as I like everyone else is in pursuit of the ultimate sound (for a price of course).- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by rogerdnI'm new to HTG, why was a new thread started ?I'm just sittin here watchin the wheels go round and round...- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by sikonikoThe purpose of the original thread was really for tech spec's and Q&A on the product. It makes more sense to do reviews in a different thread. If someone wants product info, they can read the other thread. if they want reviews they can come here.- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by skuzzybI have every plan on upgrading to the 800 in a year or so when they have the new board in as I like everyone else is in pursuit of the ultimate sound (for a price of course).Farming looks mighty easy when your plow is a pencil, and you're a thousand miles from the corn field."Dwight D. Eisenhower- Bottom
Comment
-
Wettou, the reality is that the decoding is not really needed as the players should do it fine, even if there is some debate as to whether the sound quality is different doing in in the player versus the processor. I do not understand why the SQ would be different as technically it should not matter.
My bigger beef is having to disconnect everything, remove it from my equipment rack and send it off to be serviced (assuming it is not done in the field). Once I put it in I have no intention of moving it again. It is a royal pain to have to unload my rack as I discovered having to send my 600 off, interestingly enough it has been over a month and nothing from Classe, good thing I have a loaner.
I am quite pleased that Rebelman and Sokinoko have been the trailblazers because by the time I get one all the kinks will be ironed out. Congrats by the way guys.
Rebelman, do you know if the same IR implementation is done like the SSP600 where I need the IR interface box? Also, do you know when Classe will create an XCF (philips remote file) similar to what they did for the 600, actaully it was a CCF but imported just fine.
thx
skz- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by wettouI am with you, I am also waiting for the SSP-800 to be upgraded with the new board that will decode all new codecs Dolby Tru HD and DTS HD Master Audio :T Hopefully no later than January 2009- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by OrbBelden,
was it you who moved up from the CA-2200 to the CAMs?
I know a few have.
Cheers
Orb
I am very pleased with the results.- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by skuzzybMy bigger beef is having to disconnect everything, remove it from my equipment rack and send it off to be serviced (assuming it is not done in the field). Once I put it in I have no intention of moving it again. It is a royal pain to have to unload my rack as I discovered having to send my 600 off, interestingly enough it has been over a month and nothing from Classe, good thing I have a loaner.
thx
skz
I was told by my dealer and by Classe, that the upgrade board on the SSP-800 will be performed at the local dealers. The dealer said their techs have a lot of experience doing upgrades for several of their manufacturers, so I'm not too worried about it.- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by beden1My CP-500 has also been in for Classe service for over 6 weeks now. I'm not thrilled about it, and was told the service techs were also tied up working on the SSP-800, so I guess it was bad timing sending it in when I did. My amp came back in just over four weeks.
I was told by my dealer and by Classe, that the upgrade board on the SSP-800 will be performed at the local dealers. The dealer said their techs have a lot of experience doing upgrades for several of their manufacturers, so I'm not too worried about it.
I am keen to hear how it sounds but the importer said they would not be bringing any into the country before next year unless someone orders one... I guess it will be easier to wait, plus by then it will have the new boards. Not like I have any BD software to decode anyway, my BD player has been sitting gathering dust!- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by skuzzybMy bigger beef is having to disconnect everything, remove it from my equipment rack and send it off to be serviced (assuming it is not done in the field). Once I put it in I have no intention of moving it again. It is a royal pain to have to unload my rack as I discovered having to send my 600 off, interestingly enough it has been over a month and nothing from Classe, good thing I have a loaner.
I find interesting that your 600 has been in service for so long how old was it?
I have had an Integra Research RDC7 for 7 years now and it has never been in service! Sam with my Sony Ta-E9000ES Pre/Pro which is 11 years old and works like a charm
It makes me worry about Classé may be the quality is not that great? Good thing they have a five year warranty!Last edited by wettou; 22 August 2008, 19:12 Friday.Farming looks mighty easy when your plow is a pencil, and you're a thousand miles from the corn field."Dwight D. Eisenhower- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by skuzzybI guess it will be easier to wait, plus by then it will have the new boards. Not like I have any BD software to decode anyway, my BD player has been sitting gathering dust!- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by AV-OCDAs someone that was turning to Classe to get away from the dry, revealing nature of my Lexicon MC-12HD, your comment about the SSP-800 being "less forgiving" has me concerned. I listen to plenty of imperfect recordings and I was hoping to tame the edge and digititus I hear on these.
IMO a sense of transparency comes from balancing the extraction of detail against listenibility. Push it too far and the piece goes from transparent to analytical. It's one thing to find a component that makes you want to see how much better hi-rez will be, and it's another altogether to feel all you can listen to are the best recordings. Where does the SSP-800 fall into this equation so far?
I have Revel Ultima2's and they are already revealing to the point that they border on the analytical. I was hoping to balance this against the "warm tube like" sound of the Classe.
I would also like to mention that I have had a different experience with well designed tube gear vs solid state than what you have described. Bad tube gear has its faults as does bad SS, but the best of both still sound quite different IME. For instance, I recently listened to a fully tubed Audio Research front-end connected to a pair of Watt Puppies, and Oh My God! it was phenominal! Super expansive, lush, and immaculately detailed but in a completely natural and listenable way. Much closer to "real" than any SS gear I have heard, but I admit that my exposure is limited and I haven't heard the Omega line of amps yet.
Off topic a bit, but I see in your profile that you have both the CAM400's and the CA5100. I'm torn as to whether to go with the CAM's for 2CH or just the 2200, with a separate 3200 for 5.1. What sort of improvements are gained by stepping up to the CAMs?"Dream as if you'll live forever. Live as if you'll die today."- Bottom
Comment
-
RebelMan -
Thank you for such a detailed and thoughtful response.
Based on some of your earlier posts, I wasn't sure if I needed to read between the lines, as the term "transparent" can be code for a component being revealing but not all that pleasant or listenable. This certainly doesn't seem to be the case here. In fact, I would love nothing more than to have the experience you have described in my own system.
I would love to achieve a truly transparent sound, but if a sytem errs I will take warm and relaxed over cold and analytical.
How do you have your CD player connected? Have you compared the sound of analog out from the player to the digital connection?
Thanks again,
- Tim- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by ShakespeareMy dealer tells me that he should take delivery of my SSP 800 1 week from now. Having said that, I'm not sure which Classe CD player would work best with the new SSP. Will the CDP 202 do a better job of conversion than the SSP 800? If the DACs on the SSP will be used instead of the DACs in the CD player, will any old transport ultimately produce the same sound?"Dream as if you'll live forever. Live as if you'll die today."- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by AV-OCDThank you for such a detailed and thoughtful response.
I would love to achieve a truly transparent sound, but if a sytem errs I will take warm and relaxed over cold and analytical.
How do you have your CD player connected? Have you compared the sound of analog out from the player to the digital connection?"Dream as if you'll live forever. Live as if you'll die today."- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by skuzzybOmar, from my experience, I think there is something to be said about the "break in period," ..."Dream as if you'll live forever. Live as if you'll die today."- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by skuzzybI am quite pleased that Rebelman and Sokinoko have been the trailblazers because by the time I get one all the kinks will be ironed out. Congrats by the way guys.
Rebelman, do you know if the same IR implementation is done like the SSP600 where I need the IR interface box? Also, do you know when Classe will create an XCF (philips remote file) similar to what they did for the 600, actaully it was a CCF but imported just fine."Dream as if you'll live forever. Live as if you'll die today."- Bottom
Comment
-
"My SSP-800 only has 56 hours on it so it's still "
for the break-in, do it have to be 300 straight hour or we can put in on standby isntead of letting it plays 24/24 ?
Rebel, anxious to see your comments about the cdp-202 and digital connection- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by rompower"My SSP-800 only has 56 hours on it so it's still "
for the break-in, do it have to be 300 straight hour or we can put in on standby instead of letting it plays 24/24 ?
He mentioned that standby doesn't do it.Farming looks mighty easy when your plow is a pencil, and you're a thousand miles from the corn field."Dwight D. Eisenhower- Bottom
Comment
Comment