Watched Inglorious Bastards on Sunday. I've only seen one other Quentin T movie (Pulp Fiction) and didn't think to much of it. I've also read a few things about him and his movies here and there.
Well this was one of his movies and I think it would have been better with about 50% less QT.
Does anyone really enjoy the graphic violence?
Does anyone think it adds to the movie?
Does anyone think it would be a lessor movie without it?
The Spaghetti Western touches, the mixed humor were ok. The villain was great and played to the hilt. Rewriting history was interesting. Brad Pitt was corney, as was the idea I'm sure.
Why make a nice meal and then kill half the dishes with salt? I'm usually to each their own, but really what's the entertainment value with the graphic violence to this extreme? Not about volume per se, but when it had violence it was very graphic.
I'm hard pressed to understand someone "enjoying it". I also think that someone (QT) who is that fixated on violence is maybe not quite right.
Back to the world of movie viewing I guess I shelter myself into.
Well this was one of his movies and I think it would have been better with about 50% less QT.
Does anyone really enjoy the graphic violence?
Does anyone think it adds to the movie?
Does anyone think it would be a lessor movie without it?
The Spaghetti Western touches, the mixed humor were ok. The villain was great and played to the hilt. Rewriting history was interesting. Brad Pitt was corney, as was the idea I'm sure.
Why make a nice meal and then kill half the dishes with salt? I'm usually to each their own, but really what's the entertainment value with the graphic violence to this extreme? Not about volume per se, but when it had violence it was very graphic.
I'm hard pressed to understand someone "enjoying it". I also think that someone (QT) who is that fixated on violence is maybe not quite right.
Back to the world of movie viewing I guess I shelter myself into.
Comment