...on Rotel's website.
RB-1091 & RB1092 On Rotels web page
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
I just saw that... cool cool.
I just got the price for the three front speakers using both the 1091 and 1092 or all 1091s ...and can have them in about 2 weeks (would be one week, but I'm out of town all next week)... I definitely like the price!!! Tough decision!!! Just means I need to sell either the 1095 or 1080... hmmm....
Digital Audio makes me Happy.
-Dan- Bottom
-
RB-1091 and RB-1092 on Rotel website
They have finally updated the website. My dealer in Maryland says that they expect to receive the first units in the coming weeks. Am driving my B&W 804s w/ an RB-1070, so hoping to find a big sonic improvement, given that they are 3-4x the price. Anyone else actually heard one yet?- Bottom
Comment
-
Yes,
US list is $1,499 for the RB-1091 and $2,499 for the RB-1092
Aussie list still being finalised but likely to be Aus$1,899 for the RB-1091 and $3,199 for the RB-1092.
I don't know about the UK but expect about Euro 2350 for the RB-1092 based on comparative pricing with the RMB-1077 which lists for the same...
Geoff- Bottom
Comment
-
better than RB-1090?
Since the RB-1092 appears to be the replacement of the very heavy but less expensive RB-1090, here's to hopes that it will actually be a sonic improvement. I cannot imagine that Rotel's primary goal was to design a cooler running amp - if it doesn't sound better, there won't be any justification for the price, right?
Hoping to hear one at my dealer in a few weeks...- Bottom
Comment
-
quick question on the 1091 & 1092: It says in the specs that its rated from 20-20khz filter.
If I have speakers that can go below 20h and above 20khz, would my speakers then be limited by the frequency range of the amp?
I understand hearing limitations, but if my speakers can go up to 35khz, I would not want a amp that limited that.
For example the rb1090 is rated from 10-100khz- Bottom
Comment
-
Matt,
If you read down the specs a little you will see that the frequency response is 10Hz to 40 Hz -well above your speakers... The 20Hz ro 20Kz is the RMS power rating for full power and 0.03% distortion. A common issue with Switching amps is distortion rising with very high frequencies and higher power (this is in fact common to lots of amps. So they appear to be only commitiing to the 0.03% at full power at up to 20 Khz. Not a huge problem as harmonics above 20Khz are at a minimum double that or greater than 40 Khz.
The reviews for ICE Power amps that have measured THD all show this rising distortion effect. Indeed 0.03% at full power at 20Khz is very good for the ICE Power system.
GeoffLast edited by Aussie Geoff; 09 February 2006, 08:21 Thursday.- Bottom
Comment
-
Would one be lead to believe two 500 watt monos would produce the power with less strain then a 500 watt stereo amp?B&W
- Bottom
Comment
-
I really would like to hear someone else's opinion on these amps, since I did NOT like them. I was rather disappointed in the imaging, but the quality of the sound was fine. Had they imaged in the same way a traditional amp does, I would have been excited to purchase the stereo amp and one mono amp.
At any rate, I'm one person and I only tested them in one set of conditions with one set of speakers. So, when someone else gets a chance, I'd love to hear what ya think, especially compared to the 1077.- Bottom
Comment
-
I just looked at the specs... 17 lbs for the new class d vs 83 for the 1090...
Interesting
And then the power consumption...
300 Watts
34 Watts - Idling
3 Watts - Standby
VS
1200 watts for the 1090..
Hehe, isnt technology great!??...... or is it?
I like things to have weight to them, weight means realiable, :lol: also means back breaking! LOL.Last edited by Race Car Driver; 18 February 2006, 02:01 Saturday.B&W
- Bottom
Comment
-
Question on the 1091 and Class D in general. Do these amplifiers benefit from 20-Amp circuits? I have my 1090 plugged into a dedicated circuit with some improvement, however, I'm not sure how my dedicated circuit would benefit these new amps.- Bottom
Comment
Related Topics
Collapse
-
by styleHallo,
I have a Rotel system (rb1091 for center, rb1092 for mains 803s and another
rb1092 for rear 703.)
For rear in place 703 I think the 805 will be the better solution but the XT4
can be too a solution?
Plase reply.
Omar-
Channel: Club B & W Speakers
-
-
by styleHallo,
I life for movie (1000 original Movie and only about 50 dvd concert.)
I have a Rsp1068-Rb1092 for front(803s) - htm3s with RB1091 - Rb1092 with
805S rear - 750sub. HD toshiba - denon dvd standart.
I want buy a cd player...but not a expensive...-
Channel: Club Rotel
-
-
by tmtwith the new 1,2 and 7 channel Rotel D-amplifiers coming out, will they release anything in between that?
I would like to see a 3 or 5 channel amp.
I have a descent 2 channel amp (Classe CA-401) that powers my B&W802s, but my center channel and surround are powered by an ancient...-
Channel: Club Rotel
-
-
by sarsiI would appreciate anyone that can share experience on RB1092. I recently added RB1092 to RSP1098, which now drive my front speakers and now the RMB1095 drive the rear and center speakers.
Both the amp are turn on and off via the +12v trigger from the RSP1098 but I noticed each time...-
Channel: Club Rotel
-
-
by ecthelionim on the market for an amp for quiet a while reading a lot of opinions about diffrent amps help me narrowed my choice to few of them ..krell400xi,rb1092...those are my leaders...i drive klipsch rf 7 with maranzt8500(still)for almost 1.5 years time to move on i know about rb1090 and klipsch but fact...-
Channel: Club Rotel
-
- Loading...
- No more items.


Comment