Tweet
A fairly comprehensive May 2003 review of the RSX-1055 in case not already read or seen by others.
-
-
Thanks for the link glenn. I thought it was a great review. It didn't seem to be a biased review.
jus
Jus
Taking it one day at a time. Life moves quick.Jus
Taking it one day at a time. Life moves quick. -
Yeah, I read the review a few days ago and also felt it was fair and accurate.
The only thing I wish is that, when mentioning the power ratings hitting the lab's measurement on the nose, I would have liked it mentioned that so many other receivers out there fail to meet their stated specs, some by quite a bit.
The part I liked the best is that Rotel seems to concentrate on sonic quality, rather than a ton of features. That seems to be pretty accurate.
I know some components, such as the higher end Pioneers, offer auto callibration, andYES that's a feature I'd love to have. ;h
KeithKeithComment
-
I agree I would love an auto calibration feature.
Great review. Thanks for the read.
One of the biggest quirks with the 1055/1066 is the speakers distances. I hope that Rotel changes the values to feet/meters with an upgrade. The
reviewer seemed to agree.
earleComment
Comment