My Zhd review

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Chris D
    Ultra Senior Member
    • Dec 2000
    • 16875

    #1

    My Zhd review





    Let’s face it—every time a new type of A/V connection comes out, it really gets under my skin that my existing receiver or processor doesn’t support that connector type, or at best only has one or two of them, and I need more to switch between multiple components. You don’t have to admit it publicly, but if you’re an A/V nut like me, I’m guessing you feel the same. Don't we all like to have the latest and greatest technology, providing us with the absolutely best possible picture and sound? Such is the case with digital video connectors in the last few years, meaning DVI and its more fully implemented brother, HDMI.

    This is nothing new; the same thing happened when composite video first arrived on the stage, then S-video, then coax and optical digital audio, then component video. Chances are, if you have a receiver or pre/processor that’s more than a couple years old, it doesn’t support digital video, and since the latest version (HDMI 1.3) was only released two months ago, any product you already own unfortunately won’t fully support the high-res audio and video it’s capable of transmitting.

    Every time this happens, you can either go out and buy a completely new receiver or processor just to add these new connectors, or take the more cost-effective second option of adding an external switching device for the new jacks. Sure, a purist will tell you that for video, it’s best to run connections directly from your sources to the video display, bypassing additional middle connections. But what if you have more video sources than inputs on your display device? And more importantly, how do you plan on using the new capabilities of sending high-def audio with the video signal, over one cable to your receiver or processor?

    Ever since the introduction of DVI around the turn of the millennium, a few companies have started making switchers for DVI and/or HDMI. The Zhd is Parasound’s solution for HDMI connectivity, but does the job better than any other switcher I know. The problem is, up to now, I had yet to find a product that actually worked for my personal system. My equipment rack is not co-located with my video projector, meaning I run a 30’ HDMI cable from my equipment alcove to the projector on the rear wall. DVI and HDMI signals notoriously degrade over longer distances, requiring high-quality products, so I bought a quality Gefen cable that works great if I run it from my projector directly to any one of my components. I currently have three devices in my theater equipment rack with digital video capability, though—DVD player, satellite tuner, and computer.

    So I need the capability to switch at least three digital video sources… preferably more so I can soon add Blu-Ray, HD-DVD, a DVR, etc. I first tried a Gefen four-source digital video switcher, but it introduced flicker and red-lines in every video source, occasionally dropping the video signal completely. Typical signal degradation. At the end of last year, Gefen released a new HDMI switcher that included tuning knobs by each input jack to boost or attenuate the signal for longer video runs like mine, making the digital picture as clear as possible. This new switcher worked okay for my satellite tuner and computer, but still showed signal loss from my Denon DVD player. Apparently, Denon players are known to have somewhat “weaker” digital signals.

    Finally, I tried Parasound’s Zhd after anxiously awaiting its anticipated release. I had to find SOMETHING that would meet my switching needs, and I’m not the only person out there running longer HDMI cables. For us, Parasound added a “signal boost” option on the unit, which undoubtedly will go unappreciated by the majority of Zhd users that have shorter runs. As soon as I connected the Zhd, I turned on my system and anxiously switched from one video source to another, finding no signal problems at all, even though I used the exact same cabling as with the previous switchers. Imagine my surprise when I realized that I hadn’t even turned on the Zhd boost function yet! Enabling the boost function didn’t change the picture at all, so I left it off.

    The Zhd is part of Parasound’s Zcustom component series, not just an isolated product developed by itself. These tiny components are manufactured “half-rack” sized, so that two units can be joined to fit side-by-side in a standard 19” component rack, if desired. Each one is also only one standard racking unit tall, so you can’t really get any smaller packaging for A/V equipment. The Zcustom models’ size, variety, and modularity make them ideal solutions for many custom setup needs. (I have reviewed other Zcustom equipment separately here: http://www.htguide.com/forum/showthread.php4?t=21694)

    I’ll be taking advantage of the dual racking capability, mounting the Zhd together with a Zbreeze cooling unit into my theater’s equipment rack. Both units feature rear-panel 1/8” IR input jacks, and the Zhd also sports an RS-232 jack for connection to automated control systems. However, it has an additional capability even more perfect for me—it connects via an RS-232 cable directly to Parasound’s surround-sound controllers, such as my Parasound Halo C1 processor, enabling seamless switching control. When I change an audio/video source on my C1, the Zhd automatically switches to the assigned HDMI input as well. For users that don’t have need of either RS-232 capability, the Zhd also includes an IR remote control, which I found to function just as well.



    Overall, I don’t think the Zhd could possibly be any better, much less any more ideal for my particular setup needs. With five inputs, it can switch between more sources than any other product I know of currently on the market. Now that the HDMI 1.3 protocol has been released, the Zhd is also fully compliant, meaning that it will meet all needs of the HDMI 1.3 products about to be released, switching and transmitting full-bandwidth high-definition video AND multi-channel audio without signal loss. As a small, sleek, component, the Zhd can fit into any component stack, or even be hidden completely out of view when utilizing its various remote control connection capabilities. It’s even dual-voltage, usable by any buyer around the world.

    I can’t have a review without a few negatives, though, so let’s see what I can come up with. HDMI jacks are not yet lockable or the most stable, so as I’ve been evaluating the Zhd and jostling it a bit, the HDMI cables came slightly loose. I believe this was the reason that a couple times, the Zhd did not respond to my C1 controller’s instructions to switch inputs and a few other quirks. Fully reseating all connectors on the back panel seemed to resume normal operation. I’ll be watching this during continued operation, now that I’m securely rackmounting the Zhd, to see if it occurs again. While it’s by far the best digital audio/video switcher I’ve found yet, (and the ONLY one that worked for me) at a $600 MSRP, it’s also the most expensive switcher I know of.

    Lastly, the Zhd makes a great HDMI switcher, but now that the HDMI 1.3 protocol is official, I and many others want very, very much to see Parasound incorporate HDMI audio input and decoding capability to their A/V controllers. Right now the Zhd can pass on sources’ high-res audio perfectly, but it does no good unless something is on the receiving end to use the HDMI audio stream. Half of the Zhd’s capabilities are going unrealized by Parasound’s own A/V processors. This is not yet a fault, as HDMI 1.3 is brand new, but would be a travesty if not actualized with an upgrade or new models in the reasonable future.

    It’s no exaggeration to state that the Zhd is the finest digital audio/video switcher I have ever found on the market. I’m surely not alone in finding the Zhd to be the ONLY switcher that even worked in a setup with longer cable runs, either. Hopefully, Parasound fully completes the HDMI implementation into their own products with HDMI input and decoding capability in Parasound A/V controllers.
    Last edited by Chris D; 14 August 2006, 14:10 Monday. Reason: Add a few pictures to spruce up the review
    CHRIS

    Well, we're safe for now. Thank goodness we're in a bowling alley.
    - Pleasantville
  • bhuskins
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2003
    • 504

    #2
    One thing to consider is that if you really want them to upgrade the current C1 and C2 with an HDMI input, it will need to get an HDMI output as well.

    I could see having a 5 in, 1 out zHD and then a 1 in, 1 out C1/C2 (1.3 compliant and it natively decodes the 4 new audio formats of course.) The only issue is that apparently the DSP boards currently in the C1 and C2 would not be able to support the new audio formats with a simple (or complex) software update. Therefore, they would need to be physically upgraded as well.

    Nice review...

    Brent Huskins
    Media Design

    Comment

    • slayer
      Senior Member
      • Dec 2005
      • 216

      #3
      I think most of us would be happy to send in our units to have them upgraded. I would be thrilled if they came out with a Gen 2 Controller that used the same chassis as ours and had all the upgrades we have been talking about. Then make upgrading available to all current Gen 1 controller owners to send in our units to be upgraded to the Gen 2 platform. Parasound would be a model of 1st class proportions to take care of it's base customers that way. I hope they come up with something good to take care of us. I would sure hate to have to get a new controller.
      Parasound Halo C2
      Earthquake Cinenova Grande (5ch amp)
      Crown X1000 (2ch amp)
      Oppo BDP103
      Musical Fidelity Tri-Vista 21 Tube DAC
      Xbox One
      Monster Cable Signiture Series HTPS 7000
      Panasonic 60" ST Series Plasma
      BenQ HT1075 projector w/ 92" Dragonfly screen
      Energy Veritas 2.2i fronts
      Energy Veritas 2.0i center
      CAT Tiburon series side surround
      Energy E-XL 15 rear surround
      Velodyne SMS-1
      Custom 15" sealed sub (Diamond Audio TDX15)

      Comment

      • bhuskins
        Senior Member
        • Aug 2003
        • 504

        #4
        The big question for Parasound would be how much to charge for a new HDMI board, new DSP board, substantially new software and likely a new back panel? It wouldn't be cheap. I would suspect 1/2 the cost of a generation 2 unit. It also wouldn't be something they could turn around in a day. They would likely have to schedule out the conversions over a few months to squeeze them in so to speak. I don't think field upgradeability would even be an option.

        Comment

        • Chris D
          Ultra Senior Member
          • Dec 2000
          • 16875

          #5
          Exactly my thoughts, Brent! There's good enough room in the expansion port to put in two HDMI jacks, one in and one out. So your source would go to the Zhd for switching, out from the Zhd and IN to the C1/C2/7100 for audio decoding, and then OUT from the processor to the video display for the video portion.

          A little more complicated than having the processor do the switching too, but that works for me. And YES, I am willing to pay the $$$ required for the upgrade, realizing that it's going to be significant. Also, YES, I'm willing to send in my C1 and have it out for a couple weeks to get a major upgrade done.

          Randy, I think you've got the right idea about a "Gen 2" of these processors or something. I would be willing to entertain a brand new Parasound processor model, but I just want SOMETHING with these capabilities!
          CHRIS

          Well, we're safe for now. Thank goodness we're in a bowling alley.
          - Pleasantville

          Comment

          • mikepinkerton
            Member
            • Jun 2004
            • 86

            #6
            Let's assume they upgrade the C1/2 to accept HDMI and pass audio and video over the same cable. I want to easily be able to get the audio to the pre/pro, but my Mits TV doesn't have a DVI input so I have to use component.

            Anyone think this will be possible, or am I stuck using component out and 5 audio cables from the HD-DVD/BlueRay player because it's not end-to-end DVI?

            -Mike

            Comment

            • bhuskins
              Senior Member
              • Aug 2003
              • 504

              #7
              The only real issue I see with all of this is that Parasound would likely be creating 2 different solutions and that may not be feasible. One solution for the current C1/C2 as described above and another solution would be for the likely new processor that would incorporate all of the HDMI switching internally. The R&D to retro the C1/C2 base would likely be expensive and wouldn't pay off past the current customer base.

              A trade in program might be more feasible.

              Comment

              • bhuskins
                Senior Member
                • Aug 2003
                • 504

                #8
                Mike,

                Nothing says you couldn't use component for Video and HDMI for Audio...the only issue would be if the source piece of equipment doesn't allow it. And, I guess the PrePro would need to be configurable that way or otherwise you would have to send the Video from source to TV directly while bypassing the PrePro and use the PrePro for audio only processing.

                Comment

                • mikepinkerton
                  Member
                  • Jun 2004
                  • 86

                  #9
                  bhuskins,

                  I ask because with most other receivers, if the rcvr doesn't convert all inputs to component then if the input is, for example, SVideo then the output is only S-Video and you have to end up running both kinds of cables. I worry that the C2 won't pass anything but DVI if the input is DVI. Does that make sense? This is the case with all rcvrs I've owned to date.

                  -Mike

                  Comment

                  • bhuskins
                    Senior Member
                    • Aug 2003
                    • 504

                    #10
                    I hear ya...there are definitely units out there that convert every video input to HDMI output...I'm not sure this is the best way to go...the conversion has to be top notch and it usually isn't...let's say that none have impressed me yet.

                    Comment

                    Related Topics

                    Collapse

                    Working...
                      Searching...Please wait.
                      An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

                      Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                      An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

                      Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                      An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
                      There are no results that meet this criteria.
                      Search Result for "|||"