Wii Have a problem!
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Tags: None
- Bottom
-
-
What was it?Parasound Halo C2
Earthquake Cinenova Grande (5ch amp)
Crown X1000 (2ch amp)
Oppo BDP103
Musical Fidelity Tri-Vista 21 Tube DAC
Xbox One
Monster Cable Signiture Series HTPS 7000
Panasonic 60" ST Series Plasma
BenQ HT1075 projector w/ 92" Dragonfly screen
Energy Veritas 2.2i fronts
Energy Veritas 2.0i center
CAT Tiburon series side surround
Energy E-XL 15 rear surround
Velodyne SMS-1
Custom 15" sealed sub (Diamond Audio TDX15)- Bottom
Comment
-
It's many reports about people throwing their remote on the screen and cracked their TVs
It would not happen as long as you use it properly
I would say not the "wii's" problem but "we"Pioneer KRP-500M
Emotiva UMC-1
Parasound 5125
Oppo BDP-83
Klipsch RF-3II, RC-3II, RB-5II
SVS PB-10NSD- Bottom
Comment
-
I was saying that to some buddies at work. Playing a baseball game and doing the throwing motion. It's natural to release your hand and I can see someone nailing the TV screen. It's not a surprise it's happening.Parasound Halo C2
Earthquake Cinenova Grande (5ch amp)
Crown X1000 (2ch amp)
Oppo BDP103
Musical Fidelity Tri-Vista 21 Tube DAC
Xbox One
Monster Cable Signiture Series HTPS 7000
Panasonic 60" ST Series Plasma
BenQ HT1075 projector w/ 92" Dragonfly screen
Energy Veritas 2.2i fronts
Energy Veritas 2.0i center
CAT Tiburon series side surround
Energy E-XL 15 rear surround
Velodyne SMS-1
Custom 15" sealed sub (Diamond Audio TDX15)- Bottom
Comment
-
Where did they ever get the idea of a controller you whip like that, with a flimsy strap that breaks? Someone in design wasn't thinking about possible delicate items in the room, such as TVs, lamps, windows, people's heads...
I noticed all the busted TVs were either LCD direct view, or RPTVs. I bet a regular direct-view CRT could handle the impact without damage.- Bottom
Comment
-
Yeah... kinda scary. Did you guys see the interview on that site with the guy waiting in line for the Wii? I haven't laughed that hard in a while... :rofl:
I may have to pick up a Wii later this year just to try it out. Maybe by then they will have kevlar wrist straps... :B~Nick- Bottom
Comment
-
Bullet proof your T.V. screens and Kevlar everything up to the brim , if you use this gadget!! :T
Funny and dangerous :E They should hand cuff this thing to your wrist :rofl:
Berware of your kids, this could happen to you too! 8O
Cheers- Bottom
Comment
-
This whole throwing the remote issue is mind boggling to me. Some people complain that the wrist strap isn't sturdy enough......why are they letting go of the remote in the first place? I wouldn't worry about the sturdiness of the wrist strap, I'd worry about my own self control and motor reflexes (in these cases, a lack thereof)- Bottom
Comment
-
I never threw the bat away to the pitcher when I played baseball for 7 years.
I always released the bat to the side of me towards the catcher
People just need to know how to hold on to things and not "swing for a home run" When you are playing a video gameB&W- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Looking at the relative sizes of the wrist strap and the nearly microscopic cord that actually secures to the controller, I don't think they engineered it enough. And if I think that, a jury will sure find Nintendo liable.
We haven't even seen a human injury yet... wait until some 1 year old gets brain damage from a flung controller... wheeeee!
(Or better yet, as some media outlets are starting to touch on... the first suits over repetitive stress injuries from overuse of the controller.)
Nintendo's tried to foist many failed controller concepts on us since the days of the NES. The fact that they now simply impose their almighty will on us by not even offering a standard controller does not cover up the fact that they are a day late and a dollar short... again.
Microsoft has to be grinning from ear to ear by now with the double-doozie of wii-tardedness (graphics, controller, expandability) and a PS3 that can't get out of the gate. I don't like MS at all, but I have to give kudos to the only company to at least make their products work.- Patrick
"But it's more fun when it doesn't make sense!"- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Well, the Wii is designed as a completely different console than the PS3 or X360. It's going to have a niche for sure, but hard-core gamers and big A/V geeks like us aren't going to give up the other systems for a Wii. Maybe buy one in ADDITION to the other systems, for those that have big $$$$.CHRIS
Well, we're safe for now. Thank goodness we're in a bowling alley.
- Pleasantville- Bottom
Comment
-
It's been proven time and time again, the games make the system, (PS2, PS, N64, SNES, Game Boy, SNES) the system itself does not. (xbox, 3DO, saturn, genesis, sega, turbo grafix 16, etc etc)
B&W- Bottom
Comment
-
Hey, Christopher, if you know about what games are good, could you stop by my Playstation 3 thread in "Tower of Power"?
CHRIS
Well, we're safe for now. Thank goodness we're in a bowling alley.
- Pleasantville- Bottom
Comment
-
Just bought the Wii for my 3 boys for Christmas!! WOW, very expensive! I told them they can only use it in their playroom and on their own T.V. set ,and if that T.V. set gets broken, well then they would have to pay for it themselves...Am I right???
I probably will be the one to break their T.V. set first!! Ha Ha Ha !!!!
Cheers!- Bottom
Comment
-
Actually the "Wii" folks have already pretty well admitted they screwed up, I heard on the local news last night they've come out with a reinforced Wii strap that all new Wii's will come with. I was not clear from the news bulletin if current Wii owners have to buy the replacement. It's not a pure admission of guilt, as they probably don't want to set themselves up for a class action suite to replace all those broke LCD/plasma TVs! But just the fact they are coming out with this, other than saying that they are responsive to the customer, sort of says, yeah, we screwed up.
chinets, I thought the Wii was pretty inexpensive as far as consoles go, no? With X360 at 399 and up and PS3 at 499 and up. All the Wii's I saw were less than that I thought?
Peter, TV Guards. lol.Doug
"I'm out there Jerry, and I'm loving every minute of it!" - Kramer- Bottom
Comment
-
Yes, that's true, Lex. The Wii is definitely the cost-effective one of the three systems, AND Nintendo makes a profit on them unlike the others! It may be more expensive where our friend chinets is.
If I were one of those that lost a TV due to a Wii remote, I might ask Nintendo to reimburse.CHRIS
Well, we're safe for now. Thank goodness we're in a bowling alley.
- Pleasantville- Bottom
Comment
-
This is like people wanting to sue McDonalds because fast food made them fat. There is no reason people should actually be letting go of the controller in the first place. If I go buy a ginsu knife and chop off my finger, can I sue the company because they didn't think of a way to prevent me from chopping off my finger? People need to accept responsibility for their own actions. If I chop off my finger, I'm the idiot - just like if you let go of your wii remote and crack your tv, you're the idiot. If there are any lawsuits against Nintendo, and Nintendo loses.....I'm starting my own country :x- Bottom
Comment
-
would you feel the same way about a seatbelt that came unlatched in an accident
You don't even have to swing the remote hard to do "fast" things in a game. In fact, you'll end up being slower that way based on how the accelerometer in the controller works. Take trying to serve fast enough that you get smoke trails behind the ball in Wii Tennis. When you get up to the 1800-2000 skill level, trying to manually swing your arm fast in a big motion is rarely going to work. The trick is to just flick your wrist quickly.- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by Chris DThe Wii is definitely the cost-effective one of the three systems, AND Nintendo makes a profit on them unlike the others! It may be more expensive where our friend chinets is.
Plus, I'm reading rumors (since nobody who can say will, so who really knows) that MS is now making $75 per XBox360. And we know MS' usual operating method is to simply starve out competitors, so even taking a small loss is still a win to them.
But I still am saddened to see the Wii essentially take itself out of the competition. Make no mistake -- I'll buy one eventually, as I did a Gamecube, just for Mario, Metroid, and Zelda. But I doubt Nintendo will make enough off the Wii to make it more than a niche business for any other major player in the market. Maybe that's good enough for them, who knows?
I was trying to figure it out really. I think because Nintendo spent so much of its early years trying to make products that, by their nature, required something new and innovative and different, that somehow that same mechanism for product development has carried over into the console world. Unfortunately, the nature of videogames makes them unique anyway, as they are all created by scratch and carry their own unique mechanisms and play mechanics. No additional "secret sauce" is needed, and in this case, I feel it gets in the way.
Wii do indeed have a problem, but the wrist-straps are the least of it. I've said it before, but I think we're seeing the very first inklings of a video game industry recession, after the demise of the PS3, the marginalizing of the Wii, and the attempted commoditization of games as the price for such goes up dramatically.
I remember hearing parents in toy stores speak about the old 16 bit consoles, being amazed that after your $250+ investment you still didn't even get a single game, and some of them simply shutting down to the idea of getting little Timmy a console at all after finding out that the little plastic 'tapes' were $50 a pop! Now it's a $600 investment with the tapes going for $60+ a pop. I thought things got cheaper as they got more mainstream?Last edited by Chris D; 26 May 2016, 23:09 Thursday.- Patrick
"But it's more fun when it doesn't make sense!"- Bottom
Comment
-
Sony is allegedly losing about $200 per unit. So you'd have to make that much in profit back, not just revenue.
MS still has turned no profit whatsoever for the original XBox. And they are also losing money on the 360. It will be a while before either of these companies are in the black on these efforts. They are both in it for the "own the living room" factor at this point.
And I'd agree even the Wii is expensive. The cheap system is the PS2.
BB- Bottom
Comment
-
I don't think it matters one bit. Remember, the console guys are making money off every game sold, as much as $25! This is on top of hardware licensing fees as well, for everyone who makes peripherals, and of course up-front developer fees. So what if you lose $100 on your console? If the gamer buys three games and a couple controllers you're in the black.
I've said it before, but I think we're seeing the very first inklings of a video game industry recession, after the demise of the PS3, the marginalizing of the Wii, and the attempted commoditization of games as the price for such goes up dramatically- Bottom
Comment
-
Steve, 2 words. Backwards compatibility. With all those PSII and PSI games on people's shelves, that's one good reason to consider PS3 and to buy one. People see the software as the expensive portion of these systems, and people do not really like to throw stuff away. I sure hate it myself anyway. But we'll see. I think Sony is still the number 1 player in video games, and it will be a while before we know if they cement that position or slip to number 2. Just my non informed opinion.
Other than that, I think people been waiting on a new PS3 for a very long time. I always loved PS2, and I felt that system was tighter than I ever did Xbox 1, truly.Doug
"I'm out there Jerry, and I'm loving every minute of it!" - Kramer- Bottom
Comment
-
Steve, 2 words. Backwards compatibility. With all those PSII and PSI games on people's shelves, that's one good reason to consider PS3 and to buy one
I always loved PS2, and I felt that system was tighter than I ever did Xbox 1, truly.
That said, with xbox live being as strong and organized as it already is, and with it almost becoming a mandatory addition to games nowadays, I think they have a very big advantage on their side. Online playing could have been handled a LOT worse - live is actually pretty well executed. Only time will tell though.- Bottom
Comment
-
I'm not arguing the point, as I dont' have a Wii, didn't bust a TV. However, if you design a game that people are supposed to sling their arm like bowling, it is human nature to release the ball. The strap was manufactured, whether with intention of catching loose balls, I can't say, but it broke, and now Nintendo is reinforcing it. Manufacturers have a responsibility to make sure products work as intended. What you are talking about is a totally different thing Birdman. The fact is, if someone files a class action suite, and more than 1 person signs on, it won't matter if they were right or wrong, Nintendo is likely going to loose the case, as if it happens to many people, something must be wrong with the system, not the people-
Doug
"I'm out there Jerry, and I'm loving every minute of it!" - Kramer- Bottom
Comment
-
Steve, that's probably very true about Live, I know it's been really popular and Sony may in fact not catch up. They are playing in the PC world now, ironically, Microsoft's ballgame. However, I heard the PS3 would run XP, and Xbox 360 won't, lol.
Me, when I play games, for the most part, I feel it's me against machine, but I'm old school, all you young guys set the stage with Live. I did play 1 live game before, PC based, combat, I loved the game, but I sucked at it and lockups were frustrating, as I Was horrible on keyboard. Maybe it would be great to do a live thing, but for me it's a time limitation too... We'll see.Doug
"I'm out there Jerry, and I'm loving every minute of it!" - Kramer- Bottom
Comment
Comment