video DAC question

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Matt Broeska
    Senior Member
    • Nov 2000
    • 121

    #1

    video DAC question

    hey guys,

    i was looking at the box for my toshiba 2109 just last night and noticed that it says it has a 10 bit, 27 mhz video dac. now, correct me if i'm wrong, but i thought i read recently that the new denon 2800 has a 12 bit, 54 mhz video dac. so i have 2 questions i guess... one: does the increased mhz make for a major difference in image quality and is it in reference to processing speed (sort of like a 500 mhz vs. an 800 mhz processor in a computer)? and two: is the difference in 10 and 12 bit in reference to colour depth per chanel like the difference between an 8 and 16 bit image? would 2 bits per chanel actually make for a huge difference in image quality? i know that it's a progressive vs. non-progessive player, but if it's a colour issue, how noticeable is it?

    thanks in advance for any answers...
    Before you criticize someone, you should walk a mile in their shoes.
    That way, when you criticize them, you're a mile away and you have their shoes.
  • Lexman
    Super Senior Member
    • Jun 2000
    • 1776

    #2
    Matt, interesting questions. I wish I had the answers, but I don't. Perhaps we will find the answer, or at least part of the answer yet...

    Lex





    <A HREF="http://www.catcables.com" <IMG SRC="http://www.htguide.com/lexman/other/sm_logo.gif"

    Comment

    • Matt Broeska
      Senior Member
      • Nov 2000
      • 121

      #3
      another thing i could add to this is, at what bit depth are dvds encoded? i would assume 8 bits per chanel... 16 bit would be a significant increase in the size of the mpeg and i would think would require quite the powerful hardware to play back.

      it's for this reason that i would think that whatever the bit number in the video dac refers to, it isn't colour depth... plus, what would be the point of a dac that only displays (?) an image halfway between 8 and 16 bits?
      Before you criticize someone, you should walk a mile in their shoes.
      That way, when you criticize them, you're a mile away and you have their shoes.

      Comment

      • Lexman
        Super Senior Member
        • Jun 2000
        • 1776

        #4
        I think Ralph of Alpha DVD could probably assist with the second part Matt. I will forward this thread on to him.

        Lex

        Comment

        • John Kotches
          Senior Member
          • Jan 2001
          • 140

          #5
          I am not an expert on this topic... but here goes.

          You need the 54MHz decoding rate to handle Progressive Scan output, as you're outputting twice the pixels per frame.

          12bit encoding is to ensure that your 10bit data decodes are accurate out to 10bits. Most 10bit DACs are only accurate to 8 or so bits.

          Regards,




          ---
          Editor, PC/Home Theater
          Secrets of Home Theater and High Fidelity
          My Home Theater
          NEC LT-150 specific page.
          ---
          Editor, PC/Home Theater
          Secrets of Home Theater and High Fidelity
          My Home Theater
          NEC LT-150 specific page.

          Comment

          • Matt Broeska
            Senior Member
            • Nov 2000
            • 121

            #6
            thanks, guys.

            so to clarify on the last part re: bits... it's actually in reference to bit rate, not depth?
            Before you criticize someone, you should walk a mile in their shoes.
            That way, when you criticize them, you're a mile away and you have their shoes.

            Comment

            • Lexman
              Super Senior Member
              • Jun 2000
              • 1776

              #7
              While I get Ralph his password that he has misplaced, he wanted me to go ahead and pass on his reply to you. Quote from Ralph LaBarge follows:

              Let me take a shot at answering your questions.


              The increased Mhz is not related to processing power, but rather to the amount of image data that is created by the DAC (Digital to Analog Converter). DVD-Video discs have digital video data stored as MPEG-2 video. MPEG-2 video is
              encoded using the 4:2:0 (YCrCb) format which means that there is twice as much luminance (Y) data as chrominance (Cr and Cb) data. The human eye is more sensitive to brightness than color, which is why the MPEG compression process throws away some color data as the first step.


              When a DVD-Video player decompresses the MPEG-2 video streams it also converts it into an analog video format such as NTSC, Y/C or component video (YCrCb). This analog video is sent to the monitor connected to the DVD player. Newer model DVD players have D/A converters that have a higher level of precision than older models. This level of precision, which is usually stated as a number of bits (8 bit DAC, 10 bit DAC, 12 bit DAC, etc) is related to how many bits of information are created for the internal decompressed video signal. So a typical DVD player with an 8 bit DAC will generate a YCrCb signal in the 4:2:2
              format (4 bits for luminance, and 2 bits for each color difference signal). A high end DVD player with a 12 bit DAC will generate a YCrCb signal in the 4:4:4 format.


              So will a 12 bit DAC generate a "better" looking video signal than an 8 bit DAC? The answer depends on how the video is being displayed. If your DVD player is connected to your monitor using an NTSC signal, then the extra precision
              generated by a 10 or 12 bit is lost before it even gets to the monitor. In this case the NTSC signal format is limiting the quality of the video signal, and improving what you send to it wont matter.


              If your monitor has a component input (YCrCb) then the video generated by a 10-bit or 12-bit DAC will look a bit better since you wont be limited by the
              NTSC signal format. But in general you wont be able to tell the difference in quality between a 10-bit DAC and a 12-bit DAC on a regular NTSC television monitor with component inputs.


              If you have a High Definition monitor you will be able to tell the difference between a 10-bit DAC and a 12-bit DAC since a High-Def monitor can display much higher frequencies than an NTSC monitor.


              So to sum it all up here is a general rule of thumb.


              For an NTSC monitor connected to a DVD player using NTSC (RCA) or Y/C cables an 8-bit DAC is fine.


              For an NTSC monitor connected to a DVD player using component (YCrCb) cables a 10-bit DAC is fine.


              For a High Definition monitor connected to a DVD player using component (YCrCb) cables a 12-bit DAC is fine.


              Hope this helps

              Comment

              • Matt Broeska
                Senior Member
                • Nov 2000
                • 121

                #8
                i must say that's awesomely thorough. thanks so much for the info!
                Before you criticize someone, you should walk a mile in their shoes.
                That way, when you criticize them, you're a mile away and you have their shoes.

                Comment

                • rlabarge
                  Member
                  • Jan 2001
                  • 67

                  #9
                  No problem. I work with this stuff every day so I generally know the answers to real detailed DVD questions.




                  Ralph LaBarge
                  Managing Partner, Alpha DVD
                  Author, "DVD Authoring & Production"
                  rlabarge@alphadvd.com
                  Ralph LaBarge
                  Managing Partner, Alpha DVD
                  Author, "DVD Authoring & Production"
                  rlabarge@alphadvd.com

                  Comment

                  • Lexman
                    Super Senior Member
                    • Jun 2000
                    • 1776

                    #10
                    Yeah, the words have never flowed so smooth as I said them there, lol. Great job Ralph, thanks.

                    Lex

                    Comment

                    Related Topics

                    Collapse

                    • JonMarsh
                      DACs are DACs are DACs... NOT!
                      by JonMarsh
                      The Calliope uses the DA25TX; we've used that in several designs. It's a real bargain in the performance/cost ratio; it's drawbacks are mainly the large size and flimsy front plate- I've actually dissembled these on occasion and epoxied two front plates together and re-assembled the tweeter with one...
                      14 February 2022, 12:43 Monday
                    • Brandon B
                      Question about DAC's/Jitter (for Jon?)
                      by Brandon B
                      Posted what I thought was a simplified explanation about sound quality in DD/DTS vs. PCM. Curious where I'm off vs. maybe the guy correcting me.

                      My post:



                      The response:



                      My followup:



                      Some more expert...
                      15 May 2003, 09:40 Thursday
                    • wettou
                      Why Top Quality DAC matter in the SSP-800
                      by wettou
                      Why Use a Better DAC?

                      An argument for why using an external audio converter IC over one integrated on an SoC can help ensure high-quality audio performance.

                      By Dafydd Roche, Texas Instruments
                      My system-on-chip already has an onboard codec. So why should I bother...
                      04 December 2008, 12:37 Thursday
                    • JonMarsh
                      The Dark Side of Video Cards for DVD
                      by JonMarsh
                      Yes, the Emperor has succeeded in turning me to the dark side. With nearly a week without HTGuide Forum, my feeble connection to the lighter side of the force has atrophied unto nothingness- now, I know nothing but the power of the dark side. Did I mention I signed up for the XP Windows Preview program,...
                      06 March 2001, 18:10 Tuesday
                    • JonMarsh
                      NAD M51 Direct Digital DAC
                      by JonMarsh
                      Just ordered; should be in by Monday. These are just starting to become available in the US. I've been looking for something with above average performance but not over $2K, unlike my last two DACs, which while quite satisfactory from a performance perspective, are rather pricey for most of my friends....
                      15 December 2011, 12:45 Thursday
                    • Loading...
                    • No more items.
                    Working...
                      Searching...Please wait.
                      An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

                      Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                      An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

                      Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                      An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
                      There are no results that meet this criteria.
                      Search Result for "|||"