Dolby Digital Plus to be announced at NAB

This topic is closed.
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Andrew Pratt
    Moderator Emeritus
    • Aug 2000
    • 16507

    Dolby Digital Plus to be announced at NAB

    I got word of this new Dolby digital format to be called Dolby Digital Plus from an industry friend and its supposed to be unvielded at the NAB conference shortly. I find it interesting that now that Dolby's a publicly traded company that we're likely going to see more and more of these new formats as they do what they can to up market share and keep people buying licenses from them...

    Technology Spotlight: Dolby's Enhanced Dolby Digital

    By George Petersen

    Mix, Apr 1, 2004

    One of the biggest announcements at this month's NAB show will not be a product, per se, but the debut of a new audio compression protocol. Representing the second generation of Dolby Digital, the unnamed process will be unveiled in ongoing demonstrations to the broadcast and production communities.

    Given the real-life limitations in bandwidth that seem to follow every signal delivery chain — traditional terrestrial broadcasting to Internet streaming — the need to maximize the number of available channels into ever-smaller data pipelines is great. And with emerging services such as video-on-demand and DTV bringing broadcasters the capacity for alternate channels, there is no chance that this trend will slow down — ever.

    “Squeezing more services over the same bandwidth requires more efficient codecs, both in audio and video,” says Dolby's broadcast product manager, Jeff Riedmiller. “On the video side, most people are familiar with protocols such as H.264. On the audio side, we've developed the next generation of Dolby Digital.”

    An enhanced version of Dolby Digital makes sense for consumers, hardware manufacturers, software developers, content producers and broadcasters. Consumers are hardly warm to the idea of having to change hardware every few years due to the debut of new — and incompatible — playback schemes, so backward compatibility was deemed essential.

    “In considering the development of this, we focused on four key points,” Riedmiller explains. “The first is compatibility. This new system must have the ability to work with the 37 million existing multichannel decoders in use in people's homes. Obviously, any enhancements we make to the system must be compatible with those users, and this new format does provide a path to those existing Dolby Digital decoders. We also wanted to be more efficient in terms of perceptual audio coding itself, yet at the same time, offer a known quality at a lower bit rate for spectral efficiency. Everybody's looking for the ability to send the same quality picture with audio but with less bits, particularly in broadcast, using limited satellite bandwidth. This enhanced Dolby Digital addresses that need.

    “Another factor is cost,” he continues, “and as we can maintain compatibility with existing Dolby Digital decoders, there's a cost savings to any new implementer. via the enhanced decoder's ability to decode both legacy and enhanced Dolby Digital bitstreams, as well as provide a seamless Dolby Digital bitstream for carriage over S/PDIF or Toslink interfaces to multichannel home theater systems.”

    But equally important is the ability of any proposed standard to work with formats that are on the horizon. “Four or five years ago, some of the premium services on cable [as well as terrestrial TV] started offering 5.1 programming because viewers were used to watching DVD in 5.1 surround and they wanted that on television, as well,” says Riedmiller. “We also envision this technology being used on the high-definition fixed media that will be coming in the future, such as high-definition DVD and things like that, which have always driven the other side of the business.”

    The whole point of perceptual audio coding is to reduce bandwidth and storage requirements while maintaining quality. What data savings would this new codec offer over existing Dolby Digital files? “It depends on the content, but it's also governed by the quality that the broadcaster wants to convey,” says Riedmiller. “We give our customers the ability to scale the content any way they'd like. In Dolby Digital today, we recommend that people encode stereo content at 192 kbits/second. There are people running the bit rate quite a bit lower than that in stereo and have great results with it. But with this enhanced format, we're confident that in stereo, you could get that 192k rate down to 96k.”

    Bandwidth aside, does this enhanced system also support all of the cool, creative control features in the audio metadata, such as dynamic range control, dialog normalization and downmixing? According to Riedmiller, all of the Dolby Digital audio metadata is preserved in the new system, and the next generation of decoders will be able to play both existing Dolby Digital and the enhanced format with all of metadata intact.

    “This new process is still in the early stages, so we won't be showing hardware systems, but we will be doing technology demonstations for existing service providers, cable systems and satellite services worldwide who may be looking at their next-generation set-top box,” explains Riedmiller. “Certainly, local broadcasters won't need to worry about this right away, but if you're a satellite provider who wants to carry more channels of high-definition video, you'll need a new video coding system. We're offering the new audio coding system to complement this new video codecs such as H.264.

    “We're excited about this and look forward to telling the world about this at NAB,” says Riedmiller, who added that Dolby would be providing active listening demonstrations of the system at its booth during the show. “We're unveiling the capabilities of enhanced Dolby Digital for the broadcast market at NAB. Applications for the enhanced version could include satellite broadcast, cable television, video-on-demand, terrestrial broadcasting and fixed media [DVD, etc.]; pretty much anywhere you'd find AC-3 today, we'd expect to find the enhanced version. It could also apply to toys, games and wireless, as well as going into the other spectrums where there are no bandwidth constraints. The system is also capable of going beyond 5.1, and there are provisions for that.”

    © 2004, Primedia Business Magazines and Media, a PRIMEDIA company. All rights reserved. This article is protected by United States copyright and other intellectual property laws and may not be reproduced, rewritten, distributed, redisseminated, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast, directly or indirectly, in any medium without the prior written permission of PRIMEDIA Business Corp.


  • aud19
    Twin Moderator Emeritus
    • Aug 2003
    • 16706

    Well at least it sounds like I won't have to buy new gear with it being "backward compatible". THANK GOD 8O

    I suppose it's innevitable... and progress is a good thing... and I know this is one of the reasons I bough seperates but... Sometimes it's scary being a


    Need a new display? Questions about new display technologies? Visit RPTVs, plasmas, and other monitors @ HTguide


    • John Holmes
      Moderator Emeritus
      • Aug 2000
      • 2703

      Originally posted by aud19
      Well at least it sounds like I won't have to buy new gear with it being "backward compatible". THANK GOD 8O

      I suppose it's innevitable... and progress is a good thing... and I know this is one of the reasons I bough seperates but... Sometimes it's scary being a

      This is so true aud19! I'm all for progress as well. But, it sure does show you that "time waits for no man". It seems like yesterday, that all this AC-3 stuff was new.

      "I came here, to chew bubble gum and kickass. And I'm all out of bubble gum!!!" My DVD's
      "I have come here, to chew bubblegum and kickass. And I'm all out of bubblegum!!!"


      • Azeke
        Super Senior Member
        • Mar 2003
        • 2123


        How does this compare to DoProIIx?

        Would this be considered an enhancement?

        Inquiring minds want to know.

        Just curious not dissatisfied.

        Any thoughts,



        • David Meek
          Moderator Emeritus
          • Aug 2000
          • 8938

          Just call me cautious.

          I'm curious/concerned about whether there will be a discernable loss of audio quality as more and more of the audio data stream is compressed one way or another in order to give us more available channels per existing bandwidth. If Dolby (or others) can do it and maintain a high standard of audio, then more power to them. If not. . . well I hope in the end they don't forget the consumer that wants good audio.

          David - HTGuide flunky
          Our "Theater"
          Our DVDs on DVD Tracker


          David - Trigger-happy HTGuide Admin


          • Bam!
            Super Senior Member
            • Jan 2004
            • 2458

            Hey duders!

            Man I just got my undies buched up real good.....just got my 1056.....and....saw new DD 8O ....My heart!

            lucky it will be compatible....

            Personally I think instead of it going will sound more like Bang....


            Got a nice rack to show me ?


            • Chris D
              Moderator Emeritus
              • Dec 2000
              • 16877

              Wow, this is interesting.

              Azeke, this has very little similarity to DPL IIx. IIx is a matrixing program to create 7.1 surround sound from a 2-channel source. It's not a true 7.1 format, as it just breaks up the 2-channel stream. This new DD Plus would be a different COMPRESSION of surround sound (5.1 to 7.1) streams to take up smaller bandwith.

              My predictions? This will be embraced by consumers in general, as it will allow more surround sound capability in digital audio/video formats. However, if I understand it correctly, it will be, in general, a MORE compressed signal than Dolby Digital. If so, I don't see how it can realistically provide anything but a MORE degraded sound re-creation.

              As an audio/video enthusiast, I want to see the industry move in the OPPOSITE direction, where lossless compression and MORE audio and video detail becomes the standard of digital television and future hi-def DVD. (i.e. move in the direction of DVD-A/SACD)

              Luke: "Hey, I'm not such a bad pilot myself, you know"

              Well, we're safe for now. Thank goodness we're in a bowling alley.
              - Pleasantville


              • GregoriusM
                Super Senior Member
                • Oct 2000
                • 2755

                I totally agree with Chris.

                However, the average home consumer of OTA, cable, and DTH sound will probably not notice the difference.

                What I won't like is if the DVD people start using the greater compression. It is already too low of a bit rate as far as I'm concerned.

                Progress? In some areas...... maybe. Where the true sound lover is concerned, it isn't progress in my opinion.

                I certainly do hope that music especially will continue to be as high a bit rate as possible for those who want the best sound.

                For those who just want the ability to have surround sound coming from their already "overcrammed" bandwidth on cable or satellite, I suppose this is a good thing............ I suppose.

                Greg :?


                Searching...Please wait.
                An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

                Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

                Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
                There are no results that meet this criteria.
                Search Result for "|||"