Aperiodic vented box for sub, any good?

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • TEK
    Super Senior Member
    • Oct 2002
    • 1670

    #1

    Aperiodic vented box for sub, any good?

    Hello

    Just curious to hear if any of you have heard or tested the use of Aperiodic vented boxes for subs.

    Stuff before edit, just ignore:

    Not sure if "acoustic vented sub box" is the correct english term, so let me try to explain.

    It's a opening in the cabinet that is damped or filled so that it only allows some air to pass trough.
    In a closed cabinet this is supposed to give you a lower Q without affecting the resonance frequencey.

    Should possibly works as a alternative to damping the box.


    So, what do you folks think?
    Is it any good?
    Do you know about simulation tools that calculates the effect of this? Anyone tested it and found it good or not so good?

    Edit: Changed title and use of terms based on first feedback.
    -TEK


    Many of the great achievements of the world were accomplished by tired and discouraged men who kept on working...
  • Landroval
    Senior Member
    • Dec 2005
    • 175

    #2
    Originally posted by TEK
    Not sure if "acoustic vented sub box" is the correct english term, so let me try to explain.
    Aperiodic vent/box is the word you're looking for.

    Comment

    • Feyz
      Member
      • Mar 2005
      • 99

      #3
      Is this what you are asking: what happens if I use a ported box, but stuff the port with something like fiberglass to restrict air flow?

      If that is the question, you can model it with something like WinISD Pro, by decreasing the value of Qp (port's Q). It can be accessed from Box tab->Advanced-> part of WinISD. Default comes with Qp = 100, which means port loss is low by default, little resistance to air flow inside port. By decreasing this you are adding resistance in the port. If too much resistance is added be decreasing Qp to a very low value, it will turn into a closed box. Decreasing Qp has these effects from what I have tried: Excursion at box tuning is increased, F3 is increased, the first impedance peak is decreased, group delay is lowered. In other terms as you increase the port resistance, the box gradually transforms from a ported box into a closed box. Doesn't seem to me a good thing to do.

      I have some ready SPICe models if you want to play around more, not as user friendly as WinISD though. You can access them from here:

      Latest news coverage, email, free stock quotes, live scores and video are just the beginning. Discover more every day at Yahoo!


      The PortedBox2.asc file models a ported box. In there, the circuit model has a Map_ inductor element, which represents the port acoustic mass. If you right click on it and add some "series resistance" like 10K, it will do the same trick as decreasing Qp in WinISD. In there if you decrease the port length to like 0.01meter, and keep the series resistance of Map_ high, you get a aperiodically damped closed box. Advantage over a regular closed box seems to be a lower impedance peak value, if it is an advantage. It will drive more current because of reduced impedance peak. You can model the same thing in WinISD by chosing a high box tuning that gives you a small port length and keeping Qp value very low.

      One big problem in all these simulations is I have no idea what a real variovent's acoustic resistance value or a port's that is stuffed with fiberglass acoustic resistance value in reality is. Or what is a realictic Qp value for a stuffed port is, which is the same problem. It could be tried, tested and learned but I don't have neither the means nor the desire at the moment

      In case you may ask what is a variovent, it is what Dynaudio used to call, make and sell as a flow resistor device: a circular vent that has a layer of fiberglass trapped in it. Such a device is still made by Scan-Speak, and avaiable from Scan-Speak distributors like Madisound:

      Comment

      • David R.
        Member
        • Apr 2003
        • 90

        #4
        Im familar with AP membrane enclosures.. Its basically a Infinite baffle with a "membrane" over one side of the speaker.

        this type of enclosure is quite popular in the Sound Quality car audio Competition scene.

        A example of a in car AP setup:
        ruff IB work:

        AP mat construction:

        AP mat installed:


        The idea for it is to have a low-q system, using drivers that dont have the suspension for IB, so the membrane helps control the cones movement at (or around) FS during high volume levels.

        I dont really see this for a home situation though..

        Comment

        Related Topics

        Collapse

        • Rolyasm
          Found Box; need advice for sub
          by Rolyasm
          Hello All,
          I found a pre-made box for $20.00 (Retail $100.00). I have pictures which I will try to attach. Part of the whole DIY problem is I don't have a lot of tools, so I thought this might be a way to make a nice sub without all the cutting and gluing. If it is a bad idea, please let...
          06 July 2006, 14:42 Thursday
        • AdelaaR
          Box size & tube length?
          by AdelaaR
          I was contemplating on making some small speakers with a coaxial driver.
          The woofers are 6 inch.
          How do I figure out what box size and port length I need please?
          I am a newbie when it comes to these things so any ideas would be appreciated
          15 April 2011, 13:17 Friday
        • mjperk
          Port Tuning Methods
          by mjperk
          I have been helping my father build his very first set of speakers which are the Sunflower Redux from Paul Carmody. More specifically, I have been trying to provide technical expertise and guidance for him as he constructs it half way across the country where he lives. I have never built a set of speakers...
          17 April 2018, 10:16 Tuesday
        • gmed
          Scan-Speak 7" Revelator
          by gmed
          Im calculating the box volume and port size for the Scan-Speak 7" Revelator 8 ohm 18W/8831G00 or the 18W/8531G00, and Im coming up with a Box volume of 46L, F3 29.8 Hz, ported with 5.08cm x 10.3cm. At 21 Liters, Im getting an F3 of 42.7Hz with a port 5.08cm x 15.4cm. Can a 6.5" really go...
          29 December 2006, 23:45 Friday
        • Johnnz
          Nat P port length question
          by Johnnz
          Today I followed the calculations in the 3" Precision Port instruction sheet and calculated two different values. One based on the original Nat P thread that recommends a tuning frequency of 28Hz for a 50l box, and one based on Opt E's "Yet another Nat P" thread which goes for 32Hz tuning....
          15 September 2011, 23:46 Thursday
        • Loading...
        • No more items.
        Working...
          Searching...Please wait.
          An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

          Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
          An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

          Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
          An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
          There are no results that meet this criteria.
          Search Result for "|||"