Hey Fellas,
Sorry for the silence. I was out of town for a while and, go figure, all this work piled up. So I’ve been somewhat busy since my return.
First thing’s first: It was excellent to meet and hang out with Chuck and his wife. :T Thanks for all the hospitality. Nice to just relax with no time pressure. Now I can trash his speakers. :
The Seas MT’s do, indeed, sound very nice. If I could compare them to my standard RS MT's, I *definitely* prefer the Seas flavor. They are brighter and more fun than the standard RS MT’s I made. None of the 'flat' or 'dead' sound I didn't like on the standard RS's. Not too bright at all, either. But now that I’ve changed that resistor on my MT’s, I’d say the two speakers are very, very close. Maybe identical. If I had to try and tease out any difference, I might say that the integration of highs to mids/lows is a little better on my modded MT”s vs. the Seas. But that’s an opinion made by listening to my speakers a lot and then getting in the car, driving 1,300 miles, and then hearing Chuck’s speakers. Most definitely not a side-by-side comparison. So if anyone is trying to decide which version to make, I’d say the Seas and modded RS’s are pretty much the same. The standard RS sounds ‘dead,’ relatively speaking.
When my gal heard Chuck’s MT’s, she said she preferred them over my standard RS MT’s. Chuck was very excited. And I have since made her a doctor’s appointment to get her ears checked.
As far as the TMWW’s go… They’re also nice. They’ve got a *lot* of bass. More than I expected. We added the sub when listening to music and it did help things a little, but not much. For music, I think I’d be OK with no sub. One thing I liked was that you could almost feel the bass with some music. Like short pulses of air coming out at you. Chuck has really beefy amps running these things (300 W?). The only other time I experienced that was with some B&W 703 speakers that were also a 3 way design with 2 woofers. And they were being run by a pair of McIntosh 501 monoblock amps (500 W each). So it may be the 2 woofers and/or the massive power. Idunno, but it’s pretty nice.
Overall, the TMWW’s are a very nice package, especially when you factor in the cost. The highs, mids, lows, integration of it all, etc. was nice, but it didn’t grab me enough to compel me to put in the effort to build them. I would be 100% happy with them for a movie setup. But the snob in me thinks there may be better out there if you are looking for a 2 channel, no sub, full range setup for music only. I’m not sure what that speaker is, but I’m still looking. (And it looks like I will now try my hand at designing speakers toward that goal, starting with a simple MT.)
Chuck should post a photo of his front wall. His woodworking is stunning. The look of his 3 ways with the cabinet and center channel is really dramatic. You hardly notice the massive sub in the corner (seriously). It just all looks really nice. :T
Sorry for the silence. I was out of town for a while and, go figure, all this work piled up. So I’ve been somewhat busy since my return.
First thing’s first: It was excellent to meet and hang out with Chuck and his wife. :T Thanks for all the hospitality. Nice to just relax with no time pressure. Now I can trash his speakers. :
The Seas MT’s do, indeed, sound very nice. If I could compare them to my standard RS MT's, I *definitely* prefer the Seas flavor. They are brighter and more fun than the standard RS MT’s I made. None of the 'flat' or 'dead' sound I didn't like on the standard RS's. Not too bright at all, either. But now that I’ve changed that resistor on my MT’s, I’d say the two speakers are very, very close. Maybe identical. If I had to try and tease out any difference, I might say that the integration of highs to mids/lows is a little better on my modded MT”s vs. the Seas. But that’s an opinion made by listening to my speakers a lot and then getting in the car, driving 1,300 miles, and then hearing Chuck’s speakers. Most definitely not a side-by-side comparison. So if anyone is trying to decide which version to make, I’d say the Seas and modded RS’s are pretty much the same. The standard RS sounds ‘dead,’ relatively speaking.
When my gal heard Chuck’s MT’s, she said she preferred them over my standard RS MT’s. Chuck was very excited. And I have since made her a doctor’s appointment to get her ears checked.
As far as the TMWW’s go… They’re also nice. They’ve got a *lot* of bass. More than I expected. We added the sub when listening to music and it did help things a little, but not much. For music, I think I’d be OK with no sub. One thing I liked was that you could almost feel the bass with some music. Like short pulses of air coming out at you. Chuck has really beefy amps running these things (300 W?). The only other time I experienced that was with some B&W 703 speakers that were also a 3 way design with 2 woofers. And they were being run by a pair of McIntosh 501 monoblock amps (500 W each). So it may be the 2 woofers and/or the massive power. Idunno, but it’s pretty nice.
Overall, the TMWW’s are a very nice package, especially when you factor in the cost. The highs, mids, lows, integration of it all, etc. was nice, but it didn’t grab me enough to compel me to put in the effort to build them. I would be 100% happy with them for a movie setup. But the snob in me thinks there may be better out there if you are looking for a 2 channel, no sub, full range setup for music only. I’m not sure what that speaker is, but I’m still looking. (And it looks like I will now try my hand at designing speakers toward that goal, starting with a simple MT.)
Chuck should post a photo of his front wall. His woodworking is stunning. The look of his 3 ways with the cabinet and center channel is really dramatic. You hardly notice the massive sub in the corner (seriously). It just all looks really nice. :T
Comment