I am moving from a HT setup to a dedicated stereo setup.
While I am a real Classe enthusiastic, I definitely prefer staying with it.
But now I was wondering if anyone has done a 1-one-1 comparison between the CAM-400 mono's and the CA-2200, while one mono costs the same as the stereo poweramp.
I can imagine that it is better then the stereo amp, but what were the differences, and is it really worth the money?
I did have a comparison between the CA-2200 and the CA-3200 in 2-channel, which I found very hard or even impossible to distinguish.
So I was really wondering if it really is a world apart, or that also between the mono's and the stereo amp it is quite difficult to notice the differences.
Rest of my setup;
I am also looking to buy the CP-700 preamp, and I now own the CDP-202 cd player. My speakers are B&W 803D.
Thanks in advance for your reply's
While I am a real Classe enthusiastic, I definitely prefer staying with it.
But now I was wondering if anyone has done a 1-one-1 comparison between the CAM-400 mono's and the CA-2200, while one mono costs the same as the stereo poweramp.
I can imagine that it is better then the stereo amp, but what were the differences, and is it really worth the money?
I did have a comparison between the CA-2200 and the CA-3200 in 2-channel, which I found very hard or even impossible to distinguish.
So I was really wondering if it really is a world apart, or that also between the mono's and the stereo amp it is quite difficult to notice the differences.
Rest of my setup;
I am also looking to buy the CP-700 preamp, and I now own the CDP-202 cd player. My speakers are B&W 803D.
Thanks in advance for your reply's
Comment