I was wondering about op amps. Specifically, compatible with the Burr Brown OPA2134. My motherboard allows the option of op amp rolling and I'd like to see what's up. The current op amp sounds great, for computer audio. It's the best motherboard audio I've ever heard, and was a primary reason for choosing it. Gigabyte used to offer a "Premium upgrade kit" that contained 3 op amps for this purpose but they're no longer available. The three were Analog Devices AD827JNZ, Linear Technology LT1358CN8 and Texas Instruments OPA2111KP. I can find these individually but I wanted to see if anyone here could add some experience, insight, or both to the situation before I start buying op amps. The pin out for the current op amp is below. Since some new Schiit isn't in the budget right now I thought this would be a relatively inexpensive upgrade path and fun besides. Thanks in advance for looking.
Not our typical DIY thread....
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Data sheets are your friends. That's a standard dual op amp pin out so the connections are the same. The AD and LT have bipolar inputs, while the BB are jfet. Normally you'd design the input circuit with a bit lower resistance with bipolar than jfet to minimize offsets. Also, the AD and LT are faster chips, so more care must be taken to avoid oscillation. Since Gigabyte offered the chips as options it is probably safe to assume that they are properly bypassed for the higher speed chips. The question then becomes how did they handle input biasing and output offsets. I suspect there is a nondescript electrolytic capacitor in series with the output to block any DC. That could have more impact on sound quality than the output buffer chips.
That said, for a few bucks it's worth a shot to see if you can hear a difference (hopefully for the better). All you need to do is pull the old chip and drop in the new. There's also a National Semiconductor dual that people like at DIY Audio. It's really fast and may be too fast for your board layout, though.
Audibility will depend on the rest of your system. I used to use an active crossover that had TL082s and putting that in line noticeably degraded the top end. When I built the same circuit with OPA2134s I didn't notice a loss of quality with the filter in the circuit. That was before my Ardents, though. Back then I wasn't sure if I could hear the difference between power amps and now it's very clear.
Have fun and let us know what you hear, if anything.- Bottom
-
Bob is right on the money with his comments.
It's VERY important that the board layout and bypass can safely support "upgraded" op amps with their wider bandwidths- otherwise, oscillations and ringing on transients can result.
One issue to be aware of is that many of the newest high performance op amps may not be available DIP8 anymore, if that is the package type used on your MB. SMD types of course require adapters or soldering to replace.
The LM4562 is my current favorite in moderate/low cost dual op amps; the 44V rail version, the LME49860 is similar, but handles rails up to +/-22V, but they may be going end of life due to low demand. I have some stock just for future projects.
Another one to check out is the OPA1612, if you need really low input noise (1.1nV/rootHz). Of course, that's of no value a conventional buffer where the noise performance of the resistors may dominate. It also has a lot of output drive. Only available in a small SMD package.the AudioWorx
Natalie P
M8ta
Modula Neo DCC
Modula MT XE
Modula Xtreme
Isiris
Wavecor Ardent
SMJ
Minerva Monitor
Calliope
Ardent D
In Development...
Isiris Mk II updates- in final test stage!
Obi-Wan
Saint-Saëns Symphonique/AKA SMJ-40
Modula PWB
Calliope CC Supreme
Natalie P Ultra
Natalie P Supreme
Janus BP1 Sub
Resistance is not futile, it is Volts divided by Amperes...
Just ask Mr. Ohm....- Bottom
Comment
-
My motherboard actually has some nice looking gold Nichicon caps in the audio section, but I couldn't tell you about the resistors. The op amps Gigabyte used to offer go from 8 MHz to 50 MHz bandwidth, so I'm hoping I can sneak the LM4562 in for a listen. For $30 I can try the LM4562, OPA2111 and the LT1358 from Amazon. I'm not expecting any huge differences, and from what I gleaned from researching this I'm going uphill to improve the op amp in the board now. While the mobo has a better than average audio section, it is still a mobo audio section. But, it's low budget fun and maybe I'll learn even more than I have already. Thank you both for the input!Lee
Marantz PM7200-RIP
Marantz PM-KI Pearl
Schiit Modi 3
Marantz CD5005
Paradigm Studio 60 v.3- Bottom
Comment
-
All of these opamps should be sonically transparent, but ignoring that for a moment, it's interesting to note that the LM4562 (and the entire range that it's from) were designed from the ground up for audio reproduction.What you screamin' for, every five minutes there's a bomb or something. I'm leavin' Bzzzzzzz!
5th Element, otherwise known as Matt.
Now with website. www.5een.co.uk Still under construction.- Bottom
Comment
-
AD797 requires quite specific attention, in terms of layout and surrounding components to work without oscillating.
It's usually not suitable for opamp rolling unless your circuit happens to work with it.What you screamin' for, every five minutes there's a bomb or something. I'm leavin' Bzzzzzzz!
5th Element, otherwise known as Matt.
Now with website. www.5een.co.uk Still under construction.- Bottom
Comment
-
I threw few op amps that are low noise and might be well suited for audio aplication. Jon mentioned OPA1612 with input noise of 1.1nV/rootHz, in AD797 it is 0.9nV/rootHz so it might be interesting. My comment wasn't ment to offer a replacement for your op amp on your mother board - sorry for not making that clear in my post.
There are adapters soic to dip though, if that's the only obstacle for trying it.
@Matt:
Have you worked with AD797? My friend will try something quite simple with it (his words) as a preamp.Last edited by Zvu; 06 August 2017, 17:15 Sunday.- Bottom
Comment
-
I threw few op amps that are low noise and might be well suited for audio aplication. Jon mentioned OPA1612 with input noise of 1.1nV/rootHz, in AD797 it is 0.9nV/rootHz so it might be interesting. My comment wasn't ment to offer a replacement for your op amp on your mother board - sorry for not making that clear in my post.
There are adapters soic to dip though, if that's the only obstacle for trying it.
@Matt:
Have you worked with AD797? My friend will try something quite simple (his words) as a preamp.
I didn't take it that way, so no worries. I wasn't aware of the adapters you mentioned, I'll definitely look in to them. I don't expect huge differences between op amps, but so much is dependent on the supporting circuitry and outboard gear, as well as circuit design, that I'm keeping an open mind. I have a rather small listening area and (large) 91db sensitivity speakers that are quite detailed and sometimes border on forward. They're fed by 25 watts of decent Class A amplification, and the combination seems to be pretty good at reproducing what goes in to it, warts and all. I have been quite impressed by the sound quality of this motherboard (for a motherboard, anyway) so far. I will still end up with a Schiit Modi Uber but I'm hoping this adventure with op amps will at least entertain me until then, if not make the wait a little more pleasant. I still want to get a Analog Devices AD827JNZ if finances allow this month, too. It may be too "in your face" with my speakers, from the description, but it's supposed to be one of the more noticeable differences.Lee
Marantz PM7200-RIP
Marantz PM-KI Pearl
Schiit Modi 3
Marantz CD5005
Paradigm Studio 60 v.3- Bottom
Comment
-
A suggestion that you might consider saving up for bigger step up than the Modi Uber. I've got a Schiit Modi Multibit, it was a big improvement over the DAC in my Oppo BDP-103 and computer. Even my girlfriend noticed the improved clarity. Jon put it on the bench, for the price it did quite well but has some zero crossing glitching. It seems to be a Schiit Multibit thing, even Yggy has it to a lesser extent than Modi MB but still there. On Jon's recommendation I got a Cambridge 851D which is another significant step up. Probably not as big a step per dollar as the Schiit is, but that's the diminishing returns curve. The Modi MB now resides in my desktop system.- Bottom
Comment
-
If you are willing to invest a little bit more money in op-amps, you may want to take a look at the discrete op-amps from Sparkos Labs
I have used them as replacements in a couple of DAC output sections and I have been very pleased with the results.- Bottom
Comment
-
A suggestion that you might consider saving up for bigger step up than the Modi Uber. I've got a Schiit Modi Multibit, it was a big improvement over the DAC in my Oppo BDP-103 and computer. Even my girlfriend noticed the improved clarity. Jon put it on the bench, for the price it did quite well but has some zero crossing glitching. It seems to be a Schiit Multibit thing, even Yggy has it to a lesser extent than Modi MB but still there. On Jon's recommendation I got a Cambridge 851D which is another significant step up. Probably not as big a step per dollar as the Schiit is, but that's the diminishing returns curve. The Modi MB now resides in my desktop system.
If you are willing to invest a little bit more money in op-amps, you may want to take a look at the discrete op-amps from Sparkos Labs
I have used them as replacements in a couple of DAC output sections and I have been very pleased with the results.Lee
Marantz PM7200-RIP
Marantz PM-KI Pearl
Schiit Modi 3
Marantz CD5005
Paradigm Studio 60 v.3- Bottom
Comment
-
Renron did a comparison between my Modi MB and his inexpensive DAC that uses the same chip and Jon benched it http://www.htguide.com/forum/showthr...eeze-Audio-DAC Of course it is the implementation as much as the chip, but after rolling the buffer op amps and thinking his sounded quite good, he said the Modi MB was a healthy step up. He ended up going about the same level as the Cambridge, Ardents resolve so well everything in the system matters. Of course YMMV, but I think the step from Uber to MB is likely still in the big returns part of the curve.
Given Wayne's experience I assume the Sparkos discrete op amps are unity gain stable, but they don't specifically say that on the product page. That causes some concern in an output stage buffer, which is typically a unity gain position. EDIT: The data sheet shows a unity gain case in the typical applications.- Bottom
Comment
-
Ardents resolve so well everything in the system matters.Lee
Marantz PM7200-RIP
Marantz PM-KI Pearl
Schiit Modi 3
Marantz CD5005
Paradigm Studio 60 v.3- Bottom
Comment
-
I have tried out many flavors of op-amps. It usually depends on the circuit. LT1364 is a nice smooth sounding unit. I have used AD-797 with adaptors as well as LME49990. I have tried out Burson and Dexa discreet op-amps. For what I like to hear, the Sparkos sounds the best with the rest of my system. For me the price was worth it.- Bottom
Comment
-
Discrete opamps are just a joke as far as I'm concerned and it's as if to say the process of making/using an IC is somehow going to 'ruin' the sound. Of course what passes most by is that the processes used to make discrete transistors, and the like, are the same ones used to fabricate the ICs themselves. Silicon substrate with a wire bonded frame.
Going IC brings about many inherent linearity gains in that you significantly reduce parasitics, end up with excellent matching between the internal transistors and because the entire amplifier is contained within a tiny space, you reduce its susceptibility towards picking up any airborne interference.
It's the fact that the entire amplifier is compact and self contained that allow for the ludicrous technical performance that modern opamps can provide. It's a benefit, not a detriment.
Yes I have used the AD797 and it's a lovely device. All precautions necessary for using it in correctly are detailed in the datasheet. It's not difficult to use, as per say, it's just not suited to opamp rolling because it needs attention paying to its application (unlike lots of others that are unconditionally stable, in most circuits, in their stock form and can drive capacitive loads till the cows come home).What you screamin' for, every five minutes there's a bomb or something. I'm leavin' Bzzzzzzz!
5th Element, otherwise known as Matt.
Now with website. www.5een.co.uk Still under construction.- Bottom
Comment
-
it's as if to say the process of making/using an IC is somehow going to 'ruin' the sound
It was designed for LME49710. I prefer the sound of the Sparkos.Lee
Marantz PM7200-RIP
Marantz PM-KI Pearl
Schiit Modi 3
Marantz CD5005
Paradigm Studio 60 v.3- Bottom
Comment
-
It is a DIY effort. JL Sounds I2SoverUSB feeding JL Sound AK4490 DAC board into the analog section.
USB and DAC boards powered by separate Salas Reflektor shunt regulators. Analog board fed by Salas BIB shunts powered by separate toroidal transformer.
The digital regulators are fed by separate R core transformers.
I will try to post some photos of the whole thing later.- Bottom
Comment
-
It is a DIY effort. JL Sounds I2SoverUSB feeding JL Sound AK4490 DAC board into the analog section.
USB and DAC boards powered by separate Salas Reflektor shunt regulators. Analog board fed by Salas BIB shunts powered by separate toroidal transformer.
The digital regulators are fed by separate R core transformers.
I will try to post some photos of the whole thing later.
I may have to do some DIY on my SACD/CD player soon. The disc read error problem is getting out of hand lately. The laser is out of production and I need to see if the resistor mod was done at the factory. It may have been, since I have a late production model of the SA8260.Lee
Marantz PM7200-RIP
Marantz PM-KI Pearl
Schiit Modi 3
Marantz CD5005
Paradigm Studio 60 v.3- Bottom
Comment
-
Got my op amps in! Sort of. After almost wrecking my 2134 taking it out I won't be changing the 4562 out until my IC puller arrives Sunday from Amazon. I do have some observations on the 4562, though. After spending the day with it I know the 2134 won't be going back in. I think the noise floor is a tad higher than the 2134's but the trade offs are well worth it. More detail without it sounding busy or disjointed, a little more laid back, and just plain more accurate sounding-in my set up. I have no idea how things would play out in any other set up. The Realtek chips in all my other motherboards were just awful. Flat, one dimensional, like a poor drawing of music. The combination of the Creative Labs chip and I assume (uh oh) the decent op amp made this mobo a huge improvement. A real soundstage, etc..
The big step up allowed me to overlook what the 4562 brought to the forefront-the 2134 was too forward, bordering on harsh at times, and a mite "shouty". Even my girlfriend heard the difference between the two, and she's happy listening to Pandora on her phone. The backing vocal track on Sheryl Crow's "I Shall Believe" was suddenly much easier to discern but no louder than before or more pronounced, but now easily distinguished as a separate voice. Sheryl Crow's voice is smoother, louder passages don't sound like she's straining anymore. Cymbal decay is much better and bass is cleaner and more detailed. Queen's "Fat Bottomed Girls" isn't nearly as well done as my Sheryl Crow album (Tuesday Night Music Club) but the improvements are just as easy to hear. The pronounced bass lines on the track are detailed and crisp, and the chorus sounds like voices singing instead of a clump of voice. Finally, Lou Reed's "Walk On The Wild Side" from the Transformers album is once again a masterpiece. Herbie Flower's bass strings can be clearly heard vibrating, but again it isn't an intrusive distraction, just a natural part of the performance. The wonderful saxophone on the track is unfortunately still a little punishing through my computer. My amp and speakers are very good to horns on CD and SACD, but the DAC in my motherboard just isn't there. It has the same problem with the horns on Natalie Merchant's "Break Your Heart", but handles the percussion and Natalie's voice on "Jealousy" with ease and manages to keep the track from sounding congested, while keeping the plethora of instruments right there in the mix.
I am aware my post makes it look like I can stop saving for that Krell and Von Schweikert gear because I bought an op amp. Not quite. The differences are mostly subtle, with the exception of the improved coherence and placement of the instruments on the soundstage. The fact that those things were noticed by someone who wouldn't spend more than $20 on speakers, ever, was surprising to both of us. I'm listening to The Hollies "Long Cool Woman" as I type this and this is why it's one of my reference songs. I'll have more when my tool arrives and check out the rest of my toys.
Cheers!Lee
Marantz PM7200-RIP
Marantz PM-KI Pearl
Schiit Modi 3
Marantz CD5005
Paradigm Studio 60 v.3- Bottom
Comment
-
Welcome to the Dark Side. You'll now be seeking the next level of improvement for the rest of your life, often at the expense of things that make more sense.
It always amazes me when people who don't pay much attention to sound quality notice, especially without prompting. A friend with a nice HT video setup kept telling me he wouldn't be able to hear the difference if he upgraded his sound. Then he heard my Ardents and now he gets it. He still hasn't cracked open his wallet, but he knows what he's missing.- Bottom
Comment
-
It seems I won't be getting to the rest of them until Tuesday at the earliest. My IC puller has apparently run in to a snag with Amazon. My Sunday delivery is now Tuesday. *sigh*
Welcome to the Dark Side. You'll now be seeking the next level of improvement for the rest of your life, often at the expense of things that make more sense.Lee
Marantz PM7200-RIP
Marantz PM-KI Pearl
Schiit Modi 3
Marantz CD5005
Paradigm Studio 60 v.3- Bottom
Comment
-
So as not to hijack this thread any longer,
I started a thread about my DAC build over on Digital.
DIY Modular DAC Build- Bottom
Comment
-
I tried that, and almost destroyed the thing. It was a tad snug, to say the least. It should be here tomorrow. And after more reading, I'm probably going to go ahead and get a AD827JNZ. After that I'm looking at a big price increase I can't justify when I can get a half decent DAC for under $300.Lee
Marantz PM7200-RIP
Marantz PM-KI Pearl
Schiit Modi 3
Marantz CD5005
Paradigm Studio 60 v.3- Bottom
Comment
-
Usually ICs aren't that difficult to remove from sockets, but this is when you've installed the IC yourself. I'm guessing that you may have had difficulty because the IC was factory installed and probably pushed in to an extreme that made is very difficult to remove.
Needle-nose pliers or a good pair of tweezers usually work. Often I'll take a very small flat head screwdriver and place it under the IC and lever it out, that's if there's space.
I'm surprised that you found the 4562 noisier than the 2134. I can't see any reason for this, except for the input current differences as the 4562 is a BJT device and the 2134 a Jfet. The 4562 therefore has much higher input bias currents and this would increase noise if large resistors were used in the opamp circuit, but using large resistors isn't customary as it usually increases overall noise and susceptibility to noise pickup.What you screamin' for, every five minutes there's a bomb or something. I'm leavin' Bzzzzzzz!
5th Element, otherwise known as Matt.
Now with website. www.5een.co.uk Still under construction.- Bottom
Comment
-
I'm guessing that you may have had difficulty because the IC was factory installed and probably pushed in to an extreme that made is very difficult to remove.
I'm surprised that you found the 4562 noisier than the 2134. I can't see any reason for this, except for the input current differences as the 4562 is a BJT device and the 2134 a Jfet. The 4562 therefore has much higher input bias currents and this would increase noise if large resistors were used in the opamp circuit, but using large resistors isn't customary as it usually increases overall noise and susceptibility to noise pickup.
Update: I'll have to go back and listen to the 2134 again. After getting the Creative software program completely off, several things have changed. Horns once again sound very good, bass extension is much lower and more pronounced, and cymbals are much cleaner with a more natural decay. Tomorrow I'll finally have time to roll some op amps and see what's what.Last edited by Alaric; 19 August 2017, 23:18 Saturday.Lee
Marantz PM7200-RIP
Marantz PM-KI Pearl
Schiit Modi 3
Marantz CD5005
Paradigm Studio 60 v.3- Bottom
Comment
Comment