I purchased this unit around March. I had the electrical snapping issues that some have described. At this point, its been at the dealer for a couple of months. Long story short, I can have it replaced with a brand new 1098 or pay a modest amount and upgrade? to a Lexicon MC-4. Except for the problem noted, I was generally happy with the 1098 performance, but don't want to get a new one, have the same issues, and have no recourse. Anyone compare these 2 units, share pros / cons of my choices, I would certainly appreciated it. FYI, my other equipment includes LX-7 amp and Rotel 1060 DVD. Thanks
Should I Keep My 1098?
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
AFAIK, the major popping issues were only on the 1068/1056/1067 family. Your 1098 should be an isolated incident. As far as the dealer having it for two months that's pretty crazy. I'm not sure why you would have no recourse, it's not like three strikes and your out.
Of course depending upon your idea of modest, upgrading might not be a bad choice. Doesn't the MC-4 retail for about twice the 1098? I've always found Lexicon to be lacking for music, but honestly haven't had much seat time on the MC-12/8/4 line.
Kevin D.- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by PiDDI would (did) give Rotel and the 1098 another chance ... I dont think you can beat it for the price.
Rob
Mike.- Mike
Main System:
B&W 802D, HTM2D, SCMS
Classé SSP-800, CA-2200, CA-5100- Bottom
Comment
-
-
I think everyone all around is in agreement that the Rotel 1068 dollar for dollar is one of the top great value great performers but with the 1098 you start getting into paying for the (IMO) senseless TFT screen which by itself does nothing to increase sonic performance, and the dude doesn't mind springing for the extra dollars for the Lex MC4 or perhaps wouldn't even mind steppin' up to the MC8. If money is no issue (and you fully understand that the extra dollars could go somewhere else in your system), then the Lexicon for HT performance is a no-brainer -- the surround steering and the clarity of the fronts are more than a step-up as compared to the Rotel. Lexicon for HT = ;x(Adz- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by AdzI think everyone all around is in agreement that the Rotel 1068 dollar for dollar is one of the top great value great performers but with the 1098 you start getting into paying for the (IMO) senseless TFT screen which by itself does nothing to increase sonic performance,..."Dream as if you'll live forever. Live as if you'll die today."- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by RebelManNot so. The cost to manufacture and utililze the TFT screen is far less than you think. Initially it was a little more than it is today but not anywhere near what I think you maybe assuming. Rotel has gone further in developing technologies and techniques that effect sound with the 1098 than they ever did with the 1068. Remember the 1068 is a derivative of the 1098. Its creation was based more on econmics than sound and it benefited from the R&D that went into the 1098. The 1068 is a good value but I find the 1098 to be a great one.
Hmmm... Rebel, I recall you and I have crossed paths before w/r/t this topic: http://www.htguide.com/forum/showthread.php4?t=14306
This is a Rotel forum but he should hear other views as well especially from former Rotel owners. Now I am sometimes a Rotel amp basher and for good reason, but not a processor basher, I owned the highly regarded unbelievably valued 1066 (my first foray into separates after owning a Pioneer receiver for a long time) and then owned the 1098. I didn't find much of a sonic difference (if any) and I paid almost 3x more for the 1098. I've never heard the 1068 myself so I can't confirm in my opinion if they have taken a step backwards from the 1066 as compared to the 1098 and therefore only have professional reviews and others' comments to go by in which we've all heard varying comparisons between the 1068 and the 1098 and lots of comments (for what they're worth) that much of the price difference was attributable to the screen.
Not intending to hi-jack the thread so I'll still stand by my recommendation that if the guy's willing to strongly consider the entry level Lexicon up against the Rotel, one opinion (mine) is that he should go with the Lexicon and never look back as I believe it to be an upgrade and worth the extra money even though that factor doesn't seem to be a consideration to him (Note: I went from the 1098 to the Bryston 1.7 and now I am considering the Lexicon myself after hearing it briefly for the first time -- what got me was the intense surround steering which I understand is do to their overall implementation and post-processing proprietary software).Adz- Bottom
Comment
-
Thanks for all the input. I decided to go with the 1098 and should receive a new one in about a week if all goes well. I'm assuming it will be perfect. If not, then on to plan B. I could do the money if I had to, but ended up thinking that I should expect the 1098 to not have these problems. That way, I'll get an HDTV that much sooner. I did not test the MC-4, and while I received feedback that it is an excellent home theater unit, perhaps it didn't fare that well in 2 channel. However, if I have issues with the replacement 1098, I will test the MC-4.- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by AdzHmmm... Rebel, I recall you and I have crossed paths before w/r/t this topic: http://www.htguide.com/forum/showthread.php4?t=14306
I've never heard the 1068 myself so I can't confirm in my opinion if they have taken a step backwards from the 1066 as compared to the 1098 and therefore only have professional reviews and others' comments to go by in which we've all heard varying comparisons between the 1068 and the 1098 and lots of comments (for what they're worth) that much of the price difference was attributable to the screen."Dream as if you'll live forever. Live as if you'll die today."- Bottom
Comment
-
Madmoose you have made, IMO, a wise decison. My 1098 has been fault free from day one. However, I understand your concerns - from comments in this forum - Rotel have not been without their problems of late. These appear to have died down with their renewed focus on quality and with any luck you will have years of enjoyment from your 1098.
Trevor- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by RebelManYou insinuated that the price differences between the 1098 and the 1068 lied strictly with the the inclusion of the TFT screen on the 1098, which is not so. In the previous thread I mentioned that much of the price difference was related to the screen but not most of it and certainly not all of it as you seemed to think. I apologize if I made some gross assumptions with respect to your comments but nothing that I have said has been inconsistent, if that was your point.Adz- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by AdzNo, there was absolutely no point being made about inconsistency. Just kinda funny that we discussed the issue in the past and I remembered it! By the way, "insinuation" has such a negative connotation with it."Dream as if you'll live forever. Live as if you'll die today."- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by Adz... (Note: I went from the 1098 to the Bryston 1.7 and ...- Bottom
Comment
-
The Bryston 1.7 the next level? Perhaps in price and build, but 2 ch SQ is only a small improvement, and I don't even like the surround steering as much, overall the unit is a huge step BACKWARDS from the 1098 in features and technology IMHO.Jerry Rappaport- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by maddogSo Adz, would you say the Bryston 1.7 is the "next level" in comparison to the Rotel 1098, or would you say that it's just an incremental upgrade? Enquiring minds want to know!
There is at least one review out on the 1.7 where the reviewer thought the 1.7 was better than a Meridian pre/pro he tested, so go figure. Now I had the 1098 and the 1.7 in my same set-up, same acoustics, same everything. I would say it was in fact hard for me to determine if there was a discernable difference or not in the steering in the surrounds. Now if you want to talk about the front three and the sub, that's a whole different ballgame. The 1.7 smoked the 1098, ate it up and spit it out to the point where I needed to rehook up my Pioneer receiver to make sure the Rotel had done to it what the 1.7 was now doing back. It sounded as if I upgraded all my equipment around it. Clearly the Brsyton architecture and commitment to quality implementation of the DACS and circuitry around them was shining through, but I just do not know why I couldn't tell the same marked difference in the surrounds -- perhaps the surrounds have more to do with the software/DSP, not sure.
Build quality is no contest. Price is interesting. The Bryston can be had for about $1,500 more. But (if you believe the management of Bryston and so far there is no reason not to), then you know you have bought a processor that is future proof (no, not future proof like Rotel claims to be), but truly upgradeable for more than a small fee but certainly not the cost of the next generation Rotel pre/pro and the next and the next. Now, you may have to wait because Bryston has to take their time, assess the direction of the market and new technology and then move forward with an upgrade - they upgraded from the SP1 to the SP1.7 and now they are about to release a major software /new digital board upgrade including a much more powerful chip (the TI Aureus) which will probably cost around a $1,000 to send in for an upgrade, but just think-- I spent $4,000 combined on the 1066 and 1098, and assume Rotel comes out with its next generation processor (call it the "1198") and its another $3-4k, and I would have spent $7-8k in say less than 3-5 years to keep up, whereas I will spend considerably less on the Bryston.
Now, the Bryston does not have all the bells and whistles - for example, it has no video switching or video circuitry of any kind in its processor - just pure audio focused. Whether that improves the sound or not, who knows, but the theory Bryston espouses that video hardware can be a source of radio frequency interference which can cause audible loss of quality to the sound output in terms of interference/noise/distortion is interesting nonetheless, and it certainly can only help. Maybe that's why I thought my 1066 sounded as good as my 1098 since it didn't have a friggin' TV monitor attached to it. Perhaps its the lack of those bells and whistles which makes it sound so damn good. I do wish Bryston would one day add some sort of EQ program by the way!!
I'd love to have the upgrade dne to the Bryston and then compare it to a Lexicon MC12 in my home theater which I think my local dealer will lend to me. If the MC12 smokes it in my set-up (it does cost considerably more and has its own proprietary post-processing software), then I know with over 18 years left on my Bryston transferable warranty and the audiophile preamp it has, I'll be able to sell it for a lot more than I got for my 1098 (percentage wise, that is).
But a mistake a lot of people make is buying incredibly expensive processors and amplifiers and then hooking them up to less expensive speakers. If, instead, they bought a medium-price processor and amps and hooked them up to medium price speakers it would sound much better. So, my speakers may have to be next -- oh my 8O !
Finally, if you want to see what was going on at the time when I made the switch, here are two threads. You'll notice that some pretty knowledgeable people chimed in and also includes DrJRapp's review which did not appear to be in optimal conditions to make a fair comparison which I think he admits to. In the second thread, you'll see brucek's (HTG resident expert and electrical engineer I believe) thoughts on the video circuitry/switching issue.
Adz- Bottom
Comment
-
Yes, I admit that my audition of the 1.7 was under way less than optimal conditions. However, the conditions were definitly good enough to hear a recognizable difference in the overall surround steering between the 1.7 and the 1098. The 1.7 was much closer to my previous 1066 in surround steering than it is to the 1098. If you had a hard time descerning the huge difference between the 1066 and 1098, perhaps you were just so feature phobic about the 1098 that you never really got it set up optimally. Just a thought. Surround steering is something about the 1098 that ever single review ever written has highly praised. Surround steering by the way is not limited to the surrounds, but is how the overall soundfield is separated and steered between all speakers.
Perhaps it IS the lack of those bells and whistles which makes it sound so damn good to you. But as I said in the review you quoted: I drive a Jaguar rather than a Corvette because I prefer the comfort, sophistication and features of the Jag, rather than the pure speed of the Vette. This doesn't make the Vette a bad car, just not good for me.
Did you give your Rotel's away? I got $950 for my 1066 and I have a standing offer for $2000 for my 1098, so my total hypothetical net investment in Rotel so far is about $650. And assuming the next generation is $4000 list, and I'm dumb enough to negotiate only a 10% discount then my investment would be $4250 not 7-8K. Now how much was your 1.7 without the cost of the next upgrade?...Oh and you say it doesn't even have OSD? or PLIIx?Jerry Rappaport- Bottom
Comment
-
I really admire both the Rotel and the Bryston lineup, each for slightly different reasons, so I would be torn choosing one of the two, price not withstanding. Therefore, I think it would be prudent for me to stay out of this one.
Nice to be watching from the sidelines for a change. :lol:"Dream as if you'll live forever. Live as if you'll die today."- Bottom
Comment
-
Yes, I admit that my audition of the 1.7 was under way less than optimal conditions.
If you had a hard time descerning the huge difference between the 1066 and 1098, perhaps you were just so feature phobic about the 1098 that you never really got it set up optimally. Just a thought.
Surround steering is something about the 1098 that ever single review ever written has highly praised.
Perhaps it IS the lack of those bells and whistles which makes it sound so damn good to you.
But as I said in the review you quoted: I drive a Jaguar rather than a Corvette because I prefer the comfort, sophistication and features of the Jag, rather than the pure speed of the Vette. This doesn't make the Vette a bad car, just not good for me.
I have a standing offer for $2000 for my 1098, so my total hypothetical net investment in Rotel so far is about $650. And assuming the next generation is $4000 list, and I'm dumb enough to negotiate only a 10% discount then my investment would be $4250 not 7-8K. Now how much was your 1.7 without the cost of the next upgrade?
But seriously, I prefer to sleep at night knowing I have, with some sense of certainty, a future-proof pre/pro, rather than having to rely on my negotiating abilities or timing the market as to when the right time to sell is.
...Oh and you say it doesn't even have OSD? or PLIIx?Last edited by Adz; 30 August 2005, 07:14 Tuesday.Adz- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by RebelManI really admire both the Rotel and the Bryston lineup, each for slightly different reasons, so I would be torn choosing one of the two, price not withstanding. Therefore, I think it would be prudent for me to stay out of this one.
Nice to be watching from the sidelines for a change. :lol:Adz- Bottom
Comment
-
=Adz
Makes sense. Before Ford bought them, at one time, I recall the Jaguar had some pretty miserable customer satisfaction and reliability ratings, much like Rotel's QC in recent past. :W
=Adz
If you have a standing offer for $2k which includes an obsolescence clause for when the newest generation Rotel pre/pro comes out (which is really what only matters), can I have the person's name and contact details? I've been trying to get rid of my Pioneer Elite with Dolby Pro Logic for some time.
=Adz
As noted on their Forum, the upgrade to the 1.7 will have DPLIIx, but no OSD as far as I know, so we'll have to just relish and appreciate more its audiophile-level commitment to sonic excellence.Jerry Rappaport- Bottom
Comment
-
[QUOTE=DrJRapp]Yeah, but that was over 10 years ago. My XJ is near perfect. However, my Jag dealer sucks, like most Rotel dealers.
If that's all it's got going for it, I guess you'll have to. While you're doing that I'll be enjoying the sonic excellence of my 1098 along with the feature rich HT environment it creates. I know I won't have to wait until common everday features are nearly obsolete before my pre-pro manufacturer finally incorporates them.Adz- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by AdzI was trying to directly address Maddog's question to me with some opinion and some fact, and when I went to look up some of my thoughts at the time of my upgrade to the 1.7, I stumbled across the previous comparisons made between the 1098 and the 1.7 by others, that's all."Dream as if you'll live forever. Live as if you'll die today."- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by RebelManOh I know, but this is Club Rotel. I know you used to be a Rotel owner and your experience and opinions are welcome. However, one should expect that favorable opinons made about another brand, with respect to Rotel, is likey to incite some strong feedback from existing owners.Adz- Bottom
Comment
Comment