I check out Higherfi.com often to see things I will never afford, but they have heard some of the most expensive speakers made and they have a section where they rate the speakers they have listened to. The 800D has a B- grade and I think the best rating they gave to a speaker is a B. They have comments on the speakers and they said that the 800D is Balanced and on the negative side they point out the Kevlar "quack".... what the hell are they referring too?
kevlar midrange "Quack"
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Tags: None
- Bottom
-
Kevlar is yellow. 3 out of 3 blind tests failed to reveal a difference between kevlar yellow and duck yelllow.
Mac 8gb SSD Audirvana ->Weiss INT202 firewire interface ->Naim DAC & XPS2 DR->Conrad Johnson CT5 & LP70S-> Vivid B1s. Nordost Valhalla cables & resonance management. (Still waiting for Paul Hynes PS:M)
Siamese :evil: :twisted:- Bottom
Comment
-
From what I have read when the kevlar gets older it may get out of shape and cause it to make a quack sound. If that happens you are supposed to take the driver out and message it gently with your fingers and that is supposed help the kevlar get back in shape. I know it sounds strange but that is what I heard and read about the problem.- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by Top CatFrom what I have read when the kevlar gets older it may get out of shape and cause it to make a quack sound. If that happens you are supposed to take the driver out and message it gently with your fingers and that is supposed help the kevlar get back in shape. I know it sounds strange but that is what I heard and read about the problem.I refuse to tip-toe through life only to arrive safely at death...
Lou- Bottom
Comment
-
The quack refers to the tonal footprint of the Kevlar midrange. Every driver unit has a coloration based on the design and material used for the cone.
The Kevlar FST unit is different to most drive units designs in that instead of the ideal pistonic behavior in it's operating frequency range, it breaks up at higher frequencies, but in a controlled manner. This results in the radiating surface decreasing as the frequency increases to better match the tweeter’s radiating surface at cross-over frequency. While the ideal loudspeaker would use drive units that are pistonic through-out their operating range (e.g. B&W Nautilus) it will have to be at least a 4 way design to allow a gradual step change in radiating surfaces at cross-over frequencies.
The best review that I read of a B&W loudspeaker is the Hifi World Sep 2006 on the 801D. Overall it is a rave review of the 801D concluding by "These are best 801s ever, and lay credible claim to being the best loudspeakers ever too."
The review is excellent in that fully describes the strengths and weaknesses of the 801D design. Here is a quote on the only weakness highlighted: "…I'm loathe to talk about the downsides of the 801Ds, because their overall performance is so incredibly strong, but if pressed, I'd say I was least impressed by one facet of the midband. The Kevlar cone has a certain tonal footprint, which the NS1000M is able to spotlight quite starkly. It's very good tonally ... but there is a slight 'glassy' quack to it that stops is from claiming the mantle of being utterly transparent'....it's a subtle phenomenon and better described as 'character' rather than coloration. This isn’t really a criticism (the Yams have a slight metallic clang, the Tannoys a slight papery dryness, the Quads a slight wooliness, so you’re never going to get perfection)…".
Personally, I find the FST midrange good but a bit variable over the operating range – e.g. female voices are sublime but male voices a bit chesty. I believe that the Kevlar FST midrange is excellent at tracking macro dynamics (i.e. can track soft to very loud transient swings cleanly), but slightly smoothes over the micro-dynamics (the subtle harmonics riding the main transient wave).
All loudspeaker design is balancing act of compromises, but similiar to the reviewer of the 801D, I have found that the strengths of my 803D to outweigh it’s weaknesses.- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mark_NZThe quack refers to the tonal footprint of the Kevlar midrange. Every driver unit has a coloration based on the design and material used for the cone.
The Kevlar FST unit is different to most drive units designs in that instead of the ideal pistonic behavior in it's operating frequency range, it breaks up at higher frequencies, but in a controlled manner. This results in the radiating surface decreasing as the frequency increases to better match the tweeter’s radiating surface at cross-over frequency. While the ideal loudspeaker would use drive units that are pistonic through-out their operating range (e.g. B&W Nautilus) it will have to be at least a 4 way design to allow a gradual step change in radiating surfaces at cross-over frequencies.
The best review that I read of a B&W loudspeaker is the Hifi World Sep 2006 on the 801D. Overall it is a rave review of the 801D concluding by "These are best 801s ever, and lay credible claim to being the best loudspeakers ever too."
The review is excellent in that fully describes the strengths and weaknesses of the 801D design. Here is a quote on the only weakness highlighted: "…I'm loathe to talk about the downsides of the 801Ds, because their overall performance is so incredibly strong, but if pressed, I'd say I was least impressed by one facet of the midband. The Kevlar cone has a certain tonal footprint, which the NS1000M is able to spotlight quite starkly. It's very good tonally ... but there is a slight 'glassy' quack to it that stops is from claiming the mantle of being utterly transparent'....it's a subtle phenomenon and better described as 'character' rather than coloration. This isn’t really a criticism (the Yams have a slight metallic clang, the Tannoys a slight papery dryness, the Quads a slight wooliness, so you’re never going to get perfection)…".
Personally, I find the FST midrange good but a bit variable over the operating range – e.g. female voices are sublime but male voices a bit chesty. I believe that the Kevlar FST midrange is excellent at tracking macro dynamics (i.e. can track soft to very loud transient swings cleanly), but slightly smooths over the micro-dynamics (the subtle harmonics riding the main transient wave).
All loudspeaker design is balancing act of compromises, but similar to the reviewer of the 801D, I have found that the strengths of my 803D to outweigh it’s weaknesses.I refuse to tip-toe through life only to arrive safely at death...
Lou- Bottom
Comment
-
- Bottom
Comment
-
Now when I look and listen to my 803D, I'll be thinking man that yellow driver seems to say "Quack" to me. That's a problem with reading forums, besides all the misguided information about speakers and equipment and how they'll sound to you, is the thoughts they put in my mind of what I'll hear if I do this or that. Perhaps I too impressionable.- Bottom
Comment
-
I've always thought there was something strange going on near the cross over frequency between the midrange and tweeter. I wonder if this is the "quack" refered to? Adding room treatments at first reflection points seemed to help quite a bit (especially on the ceiling in my case)- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mark_NZPersonally, I find the FST midrange good but a bit variable over the operating range – e.g. female voices are sublime but male voices a bit chesty.
As for the quack, I don't see how this reviewer can say that when the people who own the speakers don't hear it. Now, don't go listening for a quack just because this joker said it was there, because your imagination will play tricks on you!- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by dknightdI've always thought there was something strange going on near the cross over frequency between the midrange and tweeter. I wonder if this is the "quack" refered to? Adding room treatments at first reflection points seemed to help quite a bit (especially on the ceiling in my case)
I have been hearing something similar (it seems) on my new-to-me N803s.
I would call it a ringing above the vocals. I find it more pronounced with female vocals. I put my ear close to one speaker and i agree that it sounds like it's at the point in the frequency range that gets spilt across the tweeter and the mid-range. It makes me wonder if this perceived "peak" would show up on a measurement or it's just "blurred" some how?? I dunno. It is not a natural sound. and it's a bummer. I will look into some room treatments. Maybe that's the magic bullet. Of course, if anyone could theorize how a crossover mod might correct something like this... I'd love to hear those ideas.- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by ckunstadtoh. nice tip.
I have been hearing something similar (it seems) on my new-to-me N803s.
I would call it a ringing above the vocals. I find it more pronounced with female vocals. I put my ear close to one speaker and i agree that it sounds like it's at the point in the frequency range that gets spilt across the tweeter and the mid-range. It makes me wonder if this perceived "peak" would show up on a measurement or it's just "blurred" some how?? I dunno. It is not a natural sound. and it's a bummer. I will look into some room treatments. Maybe that's the magic bullet. Of course, if anyone could theorize how a crossover mod might correct something like this... I'd love to hear those ideas.- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by ckunstadtoh. nice tip.
I have been hearing something similar (it seems) on my new-to-me N803s.
I would call it a ringing above the vocals. I find it more pronounced with female vocals. I put my ear close to one speaker and i agree that it sounds like it's at the point in the frequency range that gets spilt across the tweeter and the mid-range. It makes me wonder if this perceived "peak" would show up on a measurement or it's just "blurred" some how?? I dunno. It is not a natural sound. and it's a bummer. I will look into some room treatments. Maybe that's the magic bullet. Of course, if anyone could theorize how a crossover mod might correct something like this... I'd love to hear those ideas.
Though I only had my 802D's hooked up for a short time(14 Hours),I also got the feeling that they weren't truly neutral in the midrange.A Man should never Gamble more than he can stand to loose.- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by Space
As for the quack, I don't see how this reviewer can say that when the people who own the speakers don't hear it. Now, don't go listening for a quack just because this joker said it was there, because your imagination will play tricks on you!
This of course, begs the question, if you think that your speakers are great and cannot hear the "problem" is there a problem? Once you get to a certain level it is all just silly. So I agree, do not go and look for the "quack."- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by ckunstadtI would call it a ringing above the vocals. I find it more pronounced with female vocals. I put my ear close to one speaker...- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by beden1You may be hearing the limitations of your electronics, more so than your speakers. What equipment are you using to send the signals to your speakers?
Jumping ahead a bit... I took my CDs to a friend's place and listened to the same tracks on his 804S speakers powered by a Pioneer receiver. I was bummed to hear the same ringing from his speakers. It did seem less severe - possibly due to tweeter and crossover improvements from N to S?? (total speculation). His speakers were not handling bass as well as mine but I'm confident that I could identify this particular "sound".
I could have probably shrugged this off if it not were for the ONIX Ref 1's I have in my office. <no such ringing and pretty natural sounding vocals. They're not perfect. maybe a bit nasal-y. Maybe this perceived naturalness comes at the expense of resolution. OR it's the other way around for the N803's?
OPPO BDP-83 as transport / optical to Lavry DA10 dac / Integra DTR 7.8 for volume control (Direct Mode) / Odyssey Stratos Plus HT-3
blue jeans cabling
sorry, OP. I hope you find this relevant.- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by DM3000 OwnerSo I agree, do not go and look for the "quack."Kal Rubinson
_______________________________
"Music in the Round"
Senior Contributing Editor, Stereophile
http://forum.stereophile.com/category/music-round- Bottom
Comment
-
Personally I think your all quackers............tumbleweed...............
Slightly off topic, is it possible to replace just the kevlar on the FST, or is it a complete new driver.
Mine have discoloured to a golden brown colour, and my new centre is bright yellow?- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kal RubinsonThe B&Ws are not all they are quacked up to be.- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by DM3000 OwnerCareful Kal, everyone will start quoting that as being from your review.Kal Rubinson
_______________________________
"Music in the Round"
Senior Contributing Editor, Stereophile
http://forum.stereophile.com/category/music-round- Bottom
Comment
-
Actually, I am beginning to think the cheese has dun slid off everyone’s quackers. :W- Bottom
Comment
-
I have a duck call CD that teaches how to make a duck call sound real - for duck hunting. I may go home and put that CD on my B&Ws to see how they perform on material they should excell at.- Bottom
Comment
-
Originally posted by SpaceAre you sure the chesty range is covered by the mid? Seems like that would be a characteristic of the woofers.
- FST driver – surround-less design limits cone excursion at lower frequencies
- Cross-over design and/or execution
- Relatively high cross-over frequency between woofers and midrange (required by the FST design)
- Kevlar cone material sonic signature
- Woofer cone material break-up exacerbated by the high cross-over frequency
Originally posted by SpaceAs for the quack, I don't see how this reviewer can say that when the people who own the speakers don't hear it.
To quote a HiFi+ review on the 803D: "… lack of strict neutrality through the mid-band and presence, which tends to make voices sound a little thickened and slightly ‘shut in’. This is certainly the most obvious element of ‘character’ in this speaker, and while it is unquestionably audible – significantly more so than with the 802D, it must be said – the effect seems much less obtrusive and distracting than was case with the Nautilus 800 series…"
The engineer in me is keen for B&W to really try hard to make a quantum leap in performance for midrange design, as they did for the tweeter by moving from aluminum to diamond cone.
The music lover in me is simply enjoying 803Ds - they good enough to be very musically satisfying.- Bottom
Comment
-
well, I messed around with room absorption at reflection points and removed my processor from the mix for some testing. I still used my OPPO as a transport and decoded with the Lavry. I think this is a low-jitter solution. I am now convinced that with some attention to room acoustics and quiet electronics, that the ringing can be heavily abated.
thank you to everyone in this forum.
"thickened" mid-range? hmm. yeah, I think I can hear that sometimes. For me, that description fits better than "quack". at least it does not sound electronic or artificial (to me). I don't find the thickened vocals distracting on my N803s. At least, not yet.- Bottom
Comment
-
You guys quack me up !
I don't think you fix your speaker with room treatment. I think you fix your room. The more you control room interactions surely what you are hearing is more from the speaker itself.
Listening to the 804s against more expensive Focals revealed that apart from sounding different in character there was clearly room for improvement in the B&Ws. Despite this I have never been happier with the sound at home.
People like to think they have the best. You don't. Get over it. There are many different sounds out there. How many times have you heard that the most variable element in hifi is the speaker (I think the room is a big factor also).Mac 8gb SSD Audirvana ->Weiss INT202 firewire interface ->Naim DAC & XPS2 DR->Conrad Johnson CT5 & LP70S-> Vivid B1s. Nordost Valhalla cables & resonance management. (Still waiting for Paul Hynes PS:M)
Siamese :evil: :twisted:- Bottom
Comment
-
Now whenever I listen to my 802d's, I can help but notice this persistent quack...quack..quack...
are we sure b&w make the midrange out of kevlar...not duckling hair???- Bottom
Comment
-
-
-
What a joke...................
I think he was "quacking off" during his review. Is this some kind of frickin joke? I have the 804S's with classe CA2200 and they sound great. Now people are going to think there is something wrong with there speakers. Did you hear the quack when you first bought them? NO!! You could go out and buy any speaker and if there was some HIFI review that there was a quack, bark or meow, people would start trying to hear it or look for it. Come on, just enjoy your speakers. "Little quack hear a quack every where a quack quack"!!!!!!!!!!!!!!- Bottom
Comment
-
That's no black duck. Thats a beautiful swan. Fly be free beautiful swan.
I don't know about you guys but I officially ban myself from returning to this thread. It clearly makes me quackers. :stupid2:Mac 8gb SSD Audirvana ->Weiss INT202 firewire interface ->Naim DAC & XPS2 DR->Conrad Johnson CT5 & LP70S-> Vivid B1s. Nordost Valhalla cables & resonance management. (Still waiting for Paul Hynes PS:M)
Siamese :evil: :twisted:- Bottom
Comment
-
One of the things that struck me when I first heard the 802D's was that rather than being neutral as I had hoped there is most assuredly a characteristic B&W sound.Perhaps this is what the reviewer is referring to.A Man should never Gamble more than he can stand to loose.- Bottom
Comment
Comment