I've posted on this topic before, and appreciated everyone's input very much. Once I'm finally through building this system, I will certainly post pics.
I had originally planned on a B&W 802D/HTM1D surround sound system, powered by McIntosh MC-501s and my MX-135, possibly with the Velodyne 1812 sub just as charity for the neighbors. However, my wife balked at the intrusion of large "ugly" speakers (apparently these speakers closely resemble a very silly Japanese cartoon character over here in Tokyo) and greatly prefers the original sea-shell-shaped Nautilus. So do I, of course, but it brings in a whole new suite of challenges.
First, each Nautilus speaker comes with an active crossover, requiring four amps/speaker. Eight MC-501s would certainly suffice, but the current draw in my urban apartment would be tremendous (plus HT channels to boot), and I wonder how much I would really get out of these amps without proper isolated circuits. In the end, all would share two 15-amp circuits at best. Secondly, I could keep my MC-207 multichannel amps for surrounds, but considering the above power problem wonder if I should just buy another MC-207 and wait on the MC-501s for now as all the available channels would cover me then.
Also, these speakers are clearly ideal for 2-channel. I'm afraid 5 of them that's 20 separate amps!) is a bit much, and there are no well-matched options for surround. I will probably just go with SCMS for surround and skip the center channel (spreading the center channel between L&R), and wonder if a sub is necessary at any level. The Nautilus cover down to 20 Hz well, and have a 12-inch on the bottom. Yet that Velodyne 1812 certainly would be nice... I just can't imagine adding a cross-over to the Nautilus and dropping out the bottom part of the spectrum from the signal. It just feels blasphemous.
Thoughts, anyone? How would you all construct an ideal HT system with the Nautilus?
I had originally planned on a B&W 802D/HTM1D surround sound system, powered by McIntosh MC-501s and my MX-135, possibly with the Velodyne 1812 sub just as charity for the neighbors. However, my wife balked at the intrusion of large "ugly" speakers (apparently these speakers closely resemble a very silly Japanese cartoon character over here in Tokyo) and greatly prefers the original sea-shell-shaped Nautilus. So do I, of course, but it brings in a whole new suite of challenges.
First, each Nautilus speaker comes with an active crossover, requiring four amps/speaker. Eight MC-501s would certainly suffice, but the current draw in my urban apartment would be tremendous (plus HT channels to boot), and I wonder how much I would really get out of these amps without proper isolated circuits. In the end, all would share two 15-amp circuits at best. Secondly, I could keep my MC-207 multichannel amps for surrounds, but considering the above power problem wonder if I should just buy another MC-207 and wait on the MC-501s for now as all the available channels would cover me then.
Also, these speakers are clearly ideal for 2-channel. I'm afraid 5 of them that's 20 separate amps!) is a bit much, and there are no well-matched options for surround. I will probably just go with SCMS for surround and skip the center channel (spreading the center channel between L&R), and wonder if a sub is necessary at any level. The Nautilus cover down to 20 Hz well, and have a 12-inch on the bottom. Yet that Velodyne 1812 certainly would be nice... I just can't imagine adding a cross-over to the Nautilus and dropping out the bottom part of the spectrum from the signal. It just feels blasphemous.
Thoughts, anyone? How would you all construct an ideal HT system with the Nautilus?
Comment