Good deal on new 800 series

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • caleb
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2004
    • 514

    #1

    Good deal on new 800 series

    My local retailer is making the following offer: -

    Trade in a pair of 800 series speakers and get 50% off the price of the new serioes equivalent.

    This means that the new 802D selling for R97,000 - give him your old 802's and pay R48,500.

    I have decided to upgrade to 800D and the deal is New 800D selling for R156,000, trade in my old 802 and pay in R98,000.

    It means that my old 802's are being traded in at R58,000.

    How can you say no to that deal?

    I am however intrigued as to why they are making such a good offer - are B&W having difficulty selling the new series on sufficient volumes??

    Anyone care to give their opinion?
  • PavelL
    Senior Member
    • Sep 2005
    • 204

    #2
    I believe dollar is so weak now that a pair of Naut. 802 speakers that sold for 8500$ in 1999 should retail for a bit more than that in the year 2005. So B&W did not just raise the pricetag - they did make different drivers / and hence had to make changes to the crossover / and dropped the old very very successfull line altogether. If it was not purely for marketing reasons then WHY drop the old successfull line???? And the freq. response is now ±3dB on reference axis /original Naut. line was ±2dB/ Speaking of your dealer's offer - why not ask for a discount of 10-15 % and try to sell your speakers for almost their full retail price? Someone might be LOOKING for those speakers now that the new line is that much more expensive!

    Comment

    • jlee
      Senior Member
      • Aug 2004
      • 337

      #3
      Originally posted by PavelL
      I believe dollar is so weak now that a pair of Naut. 802 speakers that sold for 8500$ in 1999 should retail for a bit more than that in the year 2005. So B&W did not just raise the pricetag - they did make different drivers / and hence had to make changes to the crossover / and dropped the old very very successfull line altogether. If it was not purely for marketing reasons then WHY drop the old successfull line???? And the freq. response is now ±3dB on reference axis /original Naut. line was ±2dB/ Speaking of your dealer's offer - why not ask for a discount of 10-15 % and try to sell your speakers for almost their full retail price? Someone might be LOOKING for those speakers now that the new line is that much more expensive!
      You misunderstand the new specs. The new specs are +/- 3dB but go to the old -3dB points for most of the speakers (thereby remaining relatively unchanged). I suspect they still maintain the same or possibly better +/- 2dB specs as the old line, but for whatever reason, B&W chose to spec the new speakers using 3dB.... this is perhaps because the typical consumer doesn't understand how to properly interpret these specs and since most speaker manufacturers use a 3dB spec, it's possible B&W thought they would lose some sales to misinformed consumers thinking B&W speakers don't go as low into the bass as some cheaper brands.

      Comment

      • PavelL
        Senior Member
        • Sep 2005
        • 204

        #4
        Originally posted by jlee
        You misunderstand the new specs. The new specs are +/- 3dB but go to the old -3dB points for most of the speakers (thereby remaining relatively unchanged). I suspect they still maintain the same or possibly better +/- 2dB specs as the old line, but for whatever reason, B&W chose to spec the new speakers using 3dB.... this is perhaps because the typical consumer doesn't understand how to properly interpret these specs and since most speaker manufacturers use a 3dB spec, it's possible B&W thought they would lose some sales to misinformed consumers thinking B&W speakers don't go as low into the bass as some cheaper brands.

        Hmm. I understand the specs of 25Hz - 20kHz ± 0.5dB of their reference "snail" Nautilus just fine. We are talking MARKETING once again. Speaking of other manufacturers's specs they sometimes ignore this figure altogether and simply say something like 40-20000 regardless of wether their 40 hz is audible or not. So lack of full information in most cases is misleading. You must have seen Revel Salon specs, have you not? As consumers we are often mislead into believing in whatever we ourselves choose to. You believe the new line is possibly better... Possibly not some would say... There is NO way of saying if it is true judging by the specs provided. I've read the new line's development paper and think that the new speakers must be slightly better. IMHO
        Last edited by PavelL; 06 September 2005, 06:43 Tuesday.

        Comment

        • jlee
          Senior Member
          • Aug 2004
          • 337

          #5
          Originally posted by PavelL
          Hmm. I understand the specs of 25Hz - 20kHz ± 0.5dB of their reference "snail" Nautilus just fine. We are talking MARKETING once again. Speaking of other manufacturers's specs they sometimes ignore this figure altogether and simply say something like 40-20000 regardless of wether their 40 hz is audible or not. So lack of full information in most cases is misleading. You must have seen Revel Salon specs, have you not? As consumers we are often mislead into believing in whatever we ourselves choose to. You believe the new line is possibly better... Possibly not some would say... There is NO way of saying if it is true judging by the specs provided. I've read the new line's development paper and think that the new speakers must be slightly better. IMHO
          Just based on the specs alone, there is no way to tell, but given that the cabinet specs are more or less the same (except for heavier internal bracing) and the drivers are only slightly different, I would think that the freq. resp. would still be within the 2dB spec throughout the range as per the old line and for whatever reason B&W has just chosen to use the 3dB spec instead of the 2dB spec with a -3dB and -6dB rolloff spec. The main differences seem to be a bit higher roll off of the high freq. due to the better tweeter and slightly diff. harmonic distortion specs (some slightly better, some actually worse, but overall better) for the bass.

          Comment

          • misterdoggy
            Super Senior Member
            • May 2005
            • 1418

            #6
            Caleb,

            Bravo on the upgrade. I would jump at the opportunity if I was you. I just got the 802D's and they are great !!!

            The New 800 series have nothing to do at all with the old 800 series. They are even saying that the changes are so much that the new 802D's sound better than the old N800's. I have read 'several' reviews who agree on this point.

            So 800D, forgetting the statistics, you are going to be one happy camper :T

            Comment

            Related Topics

            Collapse

            • gcrown22
              Help with 805 Naut. Set up/Receiver Choice
              by gcrown22
              HI- Thanks in advance for your time. I have spent some time reading and there is some great info here and its appreciated. I an an new owner of 805 Naut speakers and htm2 center channel and just some lower end B&W rears for surround. I have several things I would like to figure out for my set up....
              30 April 2008, 14:16 Wednesday
            • PavelL
              Naut. 802 & Yamaha Z9
              by PavelL
              Did anyone try powering Naut.802s/fronts only/ with this particular Yammy? I've heard and I've read "the more Watts the better" threads. I do know. But sometimes it all souds like "your speakers will ONLY sound good with amps you will NEVER afford - like 4 500W monoblocks to biamp a...
              04 September 2005, 16:08 Sunday
            • turbokuo
              Some help translating N802 specs
              by turbokuo
              Here are some specs on my N802

              - Freq. Response
              39Hz - 20kHz ± 2dB on reference axis
              - Freq. Range
              -6dB at 27Hz and 30kHz
              -3dB at 34Hz and 22kHz

              1) What's the difference between Freq. Response and Freq. Range?
              2) In Freq....
              26 April 2005, 11:51 Tuesday
            • ChetGallery
              Old Speaker Specs
              by ChetGallery
              Does anyone know how to get old speaker specs for a pair of pyle speakers that I purchased around 1994?
              29 December 2004, 02:08 Wednesday
            • markov
              ASW610XP Subwoofer Specs
              by markov
              If the ASW610 XP is spec at -6dB at 18Hz am I correct to assume that if I use two of them in a room it should be -3dB at 18Hz?

              Also, what is the difference when powering dual voice coils with 200 watts each as opposed to powering a single voice coil with 400 watts?
              13 March 2008, 11:50 Thursday
            • Loading...
            • No more items.
            Working...
              Searching...Please wait.
              An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

              Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
              An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

              Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
              An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
              There are no results that meet this criteria.
              Search Result for "|||"