Suggestions needed for 8 ohm DIY speakers

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Torn212
    Junior Member
    • Aug 2010
    • 2

    Suggestions needed for 8 ohm DIY speakers

    So I just ordered a Marantz SR7005 AV receiver for my HT system. I previously had the SR5003 and wanted to upgrade for both networking and the new HDMI 1.4a since I have a 3d TV and BD player.

    So the issue is the SR7005 has 7.1 channels at 125 watts @ 8 ohms. Check out the specs here:
    Shop the Marantz™ official site. Founded by legendary acoustic expert Saul Marantz. Discover exceptional AV with our receivers, amplifiers, & more.


    I've been looking at a bunch of DIY speaker kits on Zaph, Madisound, PE, etc. But most of the designs seem to be down in the 4 ohm range. I'd like to build a 5.1 system- although the subwoofer will be powered so not so much an issue. (I'm using the surround rears as zone 2 so won't be moving to 7.1 any time soon.)

    What do people recommend for DIY surround speakers (fronts, centers, rears) that would work with the SR7005?

    Or should I be looking into an amplifier to compliment the receiver? (Again suggestions welcome.)
  • ---k---
    Ultra Senior Member
    • Nov 2005
    • 5204

    #2
    These were designed to be very amplifier friendly and are 8 ohm:


    The TriTrix and Aviatrix are 8 ohm friendly.

    I'm sure there are other projects that I'm not familiar with.
    - Ryan

    CJD Ochocinco! ND140/BC25SC06 MTM & TM
    CJD Khanspires - A Dayton RS28/RS150/RS225 WMTMW
    CJD Khancenter - A Dayton RS28/RS150/RS180 WTMW Center

    Comment

    • Undefinition
      Senior Member
      • Dec 2006
      • 577

      #3
      Originally posted by Torn212
      So the issue is the SR7005 has 7.1 channels at 125 watts @ 8 ohms. Check out the specs here:
      Shop the Marantz™ official site. Founded by legendary acoustic expert Saul Marantz. Discover exceptional AV with our receivers, amplifiers, & more.
      That looks like a pretty beefy amp to me. If it doesn't play "4 Ohm" designs, I'll eat my hat!

      addendum: I just looked at the specs. It's spec'd to 6 Ohms, which means you're safe at 4 Ohms. Why home audio amps rate at 6 amps, I don't know; but it DOES mean they will play the 4 Ohm designs.
      Isn't it about time we started answering rhetorical questions?
      Paul Carmody's DIY Speaker Site

      Comment

      • numberoneoppa
        Senior Member
        • Sep 2009
        • 535

        #4
        That looks like a pretty beefy amp to me. If it doesn't play "4 Ohm" designs, I'll eat my hat!
        Yup!
        -Josh

        That feeling when things are finally going right. Yeah, that one.

        Comment

        • dar47
          Senior Member
          • Nov 2008
          • 876

          #5
          Originally posted by Torn212
          So I just ordered a Marantz SR7005 AV receiver for my HT system. I previously had the SR5003 and wanted to upgrade for both networking and the new HDMI 1.4a since I have a 3d TV and BD player.

          So the issue is the SR7005 has 7.1 channels at 125 watts @ 8 ohms. Check out the specs here:
          Shop the Marantz™ official site. Founded by legendary acoustic expert Saul Marantz. Discover exceptional AV with our receivers, amplifiers, & more.


          I've been looking at a bunch of DIY speaker kits on Zaph, Madisound, PE, etc. But most of the designs seem to be down in the 4 ohm range. I'd like to build a 5.1 system- although the subwoofer will be powered so not so much an issue. (I'm using the surround rears as zone 2 so won't be moving to 7.1 any time soon.)

          What do people recommend for DIY surround speakers (fronts, centers, rears) that would work with the SR7005?

          Or should I be looking into an amplifier to compliment the receiver? (Again suggestions welcome.)
          I have the SR7002, and had the MM8003 amp at 140watts. The SR7005 is receiver power and the MM8003 was a wimp. It went into standby at 103db with my 4 ohm wwmt's. I sold the amp and got a Emotiva XPA 5 channel. The SR7002 just does the processing and the amp is worth every penny. If you have the money use the SR7005 to run just the rears and get an amp, then build one of the very nice designs from here.

          Comment

          • BobEllis
            Super Senior Member
            • Dec 2005
            • 1609

            #6
            Page 5 of the owner's manual suggests minimum nominal impedances. If you use front A and Front B you should use 8 ohm speakers --> the front channels can handle a 4 ohm load. Recommended loads are 6-8 ohms. You should have no problem with most of the 4 ohm designs here if you allow plenty of room for ventilation.

            Comment

            • ---k---
              Ultra Senior Member
              • Nov 2005
              • 5204

              #7
              Originally posted by BobEllis
              You should have no problem with most of the 4 ohm designs here if you allow plenty of room for ventilation.
              Except for maybe CJD's big RS-3ways with one.
              - Ryan

              CJD Ochocinco! ND140/BC25SC06 MTM & TM
              CJD Khanspires - A Dayton RS28/RS150/RS225 WMTMW
              CJD Khancenter - A Dayton RS28/RS150/RS180 WTMW Center

              Comment

              • looneybomber
                Senior Member
                • May 2007
                • 194

                #8
                Jed's Dynamic 4T's stay at or above 5ohms.


                *edit*
                I'm starting to sound like a 4T cheerleader now. Oh well, at least he's a forum sponsor.
                Last edited by looneybomber; 28 August 2010, 11:23 Saturday.

                Comment

                • 5th element
                  Supreme Being Moderator
                  • Sep 2009
                  • 1671

                  #9
                  Also the phase angles at the impedance minimum are quite low, easing how hard they are to drive.
                  What you screamin' for, every five minutes there's a bomb or something. I'm leavin' Bzzzzzzz!
                  5th Element, otherwise known as Matt.
                  Now with website. www.5een.co.uk Still under construction.

                  Comment

                  • looneybomber
                    Senior Member
                    • May 2007
                    • 194

                    #10
                    Why is that?

                    Comment

                    • mischmat
                      Senior Member
                      • Feb 2010
                      • 139

                      #11
                      I'm driving the 4T's with Harman Kardon amp and it's handling them just fine. Quite satisfied with them. I still double check if I have my sub on or not.

                      Comment

                      • 5th element
                        Supreme Being Moderator
                        • Sep 2009
                        • 1671

                        #12
                        Originally posted by looneybomber
                        Why is that?
                        If you're driving a purely resistive load with a sine wave, the peak of the sine wave corresponds with the peak in the current draw. In this way when the voltage is swinging positive the +ve side of the output stage delivers all of the current. Also when the voltage swings negative the -ve side of the output stage delivers all of the current.

                        However if we are looking at a reactive load this isn't the case. The peak in the current draw does not coincide with the peak of the voltage swing.

                        See the attached picture for a second. There are two separate graphs here. Both show an amplifier driving a sine wave, as you can see the magnitude of the sine waves is identical.

                        In the first graph also shown is the current draw of the negative side of the amplifier. As you can see the current maximum corresponds with the negative voltage maximum too.

                        The next graph shows the same thing, except now the amplifier is driving a highly reactive load. A 2 ohm resistor in series with a 20uf cap, giving an impedance of 8ohms @ 1khz with a phase angle of around 65 degrees.

                        As you can see how the current maximum has shifted considerably!

                        Lets look for a second at where I've added in the black arrow. Here the voltage swing is positive, but the current is being drawn through the negative side of the amplifier.

                        Say the voltage rails are at +- 40 volts and the positive voltage @ the black arrow is at +20 volts. The negative side of the amplifier has to deliver the current however, so it has to swing from -40 up to +20 at a drop of 60 volts. In the worst case scenario the negative side of the amplifier will have to deliver the current maximum to the voltage positive maximum. In other words, due to the reactive load the negative side of the amplifier has to swing 80 volts @ the required current. Rather then 40 volts at the required current into the purely resistive load.

                        Quite clearly driving say 2 amps at a voltage drop of 80 volts is a lot more demanding of an output stage then driving 2 amps at a voltage drop of 40 volts.
                        Attached Files
                        What you screamin' for, every five minutes there's a bomb or something. I'm leavin' Bzzzzzzz!
                        5th Element, otherwise known as Matt.
                        Now with website. www.5een.co.uk Still under construction.

                        Comment

                        • Torn212
                          Junior Member
                          • Aug 2010
                          • 2

                          #13
                          Thanks everybody. SR7005 arrives on Tuesday! I'll get back to choosing a speaker design and stop fretting over whether the receiver amp will drive it.

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          Searching...Please wait.
                          An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

                          Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                          An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

                          Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                          An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
                          There are no results that meet this criteria.
                          Search Result for "|||"