Opinions wanted for HT upgrade

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • happy
    Junior Member
    • Mar 2006
    • 21

    Opinions wanted for HT upgrade

    As it stands my system sounds great without any obvious weaknesses, but I have the itch to build something again and am looking at my HT setup. I am thinking of either upgrading my surrounds to better ones with higher quality drivers that match my fronts or adding a second sub. So that said, which in your opinion, would be a more logical upgrade.

    Option 1 - Right now I am using a pair of Zaph ZMB4's for surrounds - which sound great - but am thinking of upgrading to a pair of RS150 MT's for more of a driver match to my front speakers - 2 Nat-P's and a RS150 MTM center.

    Option 2 - Add a second sub. I have a single Shiva-x in a 4 foot sealed box with a 300 watt plate amp, but am thinking of adding a second identical Shiva and plate amp or maybe a Behringer ep1500 to power them both.

    Which would you choose as the more important of the two? Eventually I will probably do both, but for now my budget and time only allows one. Any opinions?
  • Mike B
    Member
    • Aug 2008
    • 79

    #2
    I would match the surrounds first.

    Comment

    • Mazeroth
      Senior Member
      • Nov 2004
      • 422

      #3
      Originally posted by happy
      As it stands my system sounds great without any obvious weaknesses...
      Tough to give a recommendation as you don't seem to have any weaknesses.

      Answer this for us. When using surround sound do you feel as though your rears are holding back your listening experience? Do you feel that if you were to upgrade to better rears that your listening experience would warrant the build?

      Or, would you like more low end in your system? A sealed system won't play the lowest octaves unless some active equilization is being used. With a single 12" I would worry about boosting the low end but using two wouldn't be as bad. Also, with dual subs, placed in different locations, you can mitigate some bass problems which will yield a flatter bass response. If it were me, and I absolutely had to upgrade something, I would probably build another sealed sub, place it into a different location (we can discuss this later), use some sort of active EQ (Feedback Destroyer) and get more low end and lowered bass distortion, which is the most important distortion to mitigate, IMO.

      Comment

      • happy
        Junior Member
        • Mar 2006
        • 21

        #4
        Originally posted by Mazeroth
        Answer this for us. When using surround sound do you feel as though your rears are holding back your listening experience? Do you feel that if you were to upgrade to better rears that your listening experience would warrant the build?
        No not really, granted I have nothing to reference it to. There is definitely a good rear presence and a nice full sound field. I just wondered if a bigger mid might be a little more capable in the lower mid-bass regions before the sub takes over.

        Originally posted by Mazeroth
        Or, would you like more low end in your system? A sealed system won't play the lowest octaves unless some active equilization is being used. With a single 12" I would worry about boosting the low end but using two wouldn't be as bad. Also, with dual subs, placed in different locations, you can mitigate some bass problems which will yield a flatter bass response. If it were me, and I absolutely had to upgrade something, I would probably build another sealed sub, place it into a different location (we can discuss this later), use some sort of active EQ (Feedback Destroyer) and get more low end and lowered bass distortion, which is the most important distortion to mitigate, IMO.
        I do feel like there could be more low end in my system for HT use. The sub sounds really good and moves a surprisingly large amount of air for its size, but there are times that I think it could definitely have more or do so with a little less effort - particularly in the lowest octaves.

        As far as a location for the second, my room is fairly small so the new sub would go near the couch in the back right wall corner - opposite of the existing one which is in the front left corner. I did some reading and gathered that this could give a flatter bass response as you said and also could help with any nulls do to room acoustics... Is this right?

        Comment

        • ---k---
          Ultra Senior Member
          • Nov 2005
          • 5204

          #5
          But, I think it is a personal preference or a flip of a coin. If you ever listen to 5-channel music or concert DVD's, then I would probably say the surrounds. Otherwise, I would do the sub.
          - Ryan

          CJD Ochocinco! ND140/BC25SC06 MTM & TM
          CJD Khanspires - A Dayton RS28/RS150/RS225 WMTMW
          CJD Khancenter - A Dayton RS28/RS150/RS180 WTMW Center

          Comment

          • Blktre
            Senior Member
            • Apr 2008
            • 128

            #6
            I vote sub first as well. Adding solid low end octaves imo will give you the most noticeable improvement for any HT.

            Comment

            Working...
            Searching...Please wait.
            An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

            Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
            An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

            Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
            An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
            There are no results that meet this criteria.
            Search Result for "|||"