Resistance effects on Q

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • augerpro
    Super Senior Member
    • Aug 2006
    • 1867

    Resistance effects on Q

    I did a little experiment to see how changing resistance changes driver Qts. I thought some of my fellow newbs might find it interesting. I used teh RS150.

    RS150 Nominal Qts= .4947

    RS150 8 Ohm in series (16 Ohm nominal) Qts= .9122

    RS150 8 ohm parallel (4 Ohm nominal) Qts= .4625

    I also did one with 2 Ohm in series which is more representative of what the inductors in an actual XO might be. RS150 2 Ohm series Qts= .6212
    I'll try two RS150s in series and parallel next and post those results.
    ~Brandon 8O
    Please donate to my Waveguides for CNC and 3D Printing Project!!
    Please donate to my Monster Box Construction Methods Project!!
    DriverVault
    Soma Sonus
  • augerpro
    Super Senior Member
    • Aug 2006
    • 1867

    #2
    two RS150 in series Qts= .5109, and in parallel Qts= .6136
    I'm not sure how accurate that is. SE might not be accurate calculating Q for this sort of setup.
    ~Brandon 8O
    Please donate to my Waveguides for CNC and 3D Printing Project!!
    Please donate to my Monster Box Construction Methods Project!!
    DriverVault
    Soma Sonus

    Comment

    • Dennis H
      Ultra Senior Member
      • Aug 2002
      • 3798

      #3
      two RS150 in series Qts= .5109, and in parallel Qts= .6136
      I'm not sure how accurate that is. SE might not be accurate calculating Q for this sort of setup.
      I'm not that familiar with SE but check your (hidden) settings for wire resistance etc. Series or parallel wiring the two drivers shouldn't change Qts from the single-driver's .49 if the amp/wire resistance is zero.

      Comment

      • augerpro
        Super Senior Member
        • Aug 2006
        • 1867

        #4
        Well I go through a calibration first. That should account for the wire yes? Maybe I'll post this on the SE usergroup and see if it still accurate this way. Anyone use an MLS based system to do this measurement? If it works on one then it should work on them all I think...
        ~Brandon 8O
        Please donate to my Waveguides for CNC and 3D Printing Project!!
        Please donate to my Monster Box Construction Methods Project!!
        DriverVault
        Soma Sonus

        Comment

        • Davey
          Senior Member
          • Jan 2003
          • 355

          #5
          If you attach your reference probe to the far end of the speaker wire (as close to the DUT as possible) then you will (theoretically) exclude the wire from the test.

          However, testing two identical drivers in series or parallel might yield some interesting results because the two drivers won't be identical. This could skew the Q calculations relative to the single driver case.

          I think just testing a single driver by itself and in conjunction with a series resistor is a more interesting test because it shows more clearly how the modification of Qes directly effects Qts.

          I find myself not using MLS testing for impedance measurements any more. I usually sweep the driver and go get another beer while it's testing.

          Cheers,

          Davey.

          Comment

          Working...
          Searching...Please wait.
          An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

          Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
          An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

          Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
          An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
          There are no results that meet this criteria.
          Search Result for "|||"