during PE's xmas sale I bought 6 da175s, 4 to build a pair of Zaph's BAMTMs, and the other 2 to bring the price up to the free shipping minimum (was buying other stuff too...)
I would like to use the two spare da175s to build some 8ohm nominal MTs for my daughter's stereo. her current receiver can't drive 4Ohm speakers (klh r5001 el-cheapo receiver, probably wouldn't even drive 6Ohms.) originally, the BAMTM's were going to be for her, but I can't justify a better receiver for her, yet.
anyway, I haven't come across any MT designs for DA175s (yet) but given the bang/buck ratio of these drivers, it seems like a no-brainer.
is anybody aware of an existing design?
would anybody like to help me design one?
the things that attracted me to the BAMTM were the simplicity of the xover, and the overall cost-effectiveness of the design. I would like to try to keep this MT design in the same cost/complexity league.
eventually, when I can get her a new receiver, I would probably build her a set of BAMTMs and migrate these MTs to surround duty..
EDIT:
Man, it would be great if Zaph designed an BAMT to match the BAMTM
I would like to use the two spare da175s to build some 8ohm nominal MTs for my daughter's stereo. her current receiver can't drive 4Ohm speakers (klh r5001 el-cheapo receiver, probably wouldn't even drive 6Ohms.) originally, the BAMTM's were going to be for her, but I can't justify a better receiver for her, yet.
anyway, I haven't come across any MT designs for DA175s (yet) but given the bang/buck ratio of these drivers, it seems like a no-brainer.
is anybody aware of an existing design?
would anybody like to help me design one?
the things that attracted me to the BAMTM were the simplicity of the xover, and the overall cost-effectiveness of the design. I would like to try to keep this MT design in the same cost/complexity league.
eventually, when I can get her a new receiver, I would probably build her a set of BAMTMs and migrate these MTs to surround duty..
EDIT:
Man, it would be great if Zaph designed an BAMT to match the BAMTM
Comment