18W/8531G00 sealed vs ported, any experience?

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • gmed
    Senior Member
    • Dec 2006
    • 207

    18W/8531G00 sealed vs ported, any experience?

    Has anyone compared the 18W/8531G00 in sealed vs ported? Which do you prefer? Im debating whether I should have them ported vs sealed with a sub?

    G
  • Rick Craig
    Senior Member
    • Jul 2006
    • 391

    #2
    Originally posted by gmed
    Has anyone compared the 18W/8531G00 in sealed vs ported? Which do you prefer? Im debating whether I should have them ported vs sealed with a sub?

    G
    I've used it sealed for subwoofer use and it works very well with a -3db point around 55hz (.75 cubic ft.).

    Comment

    • Paul W
      Senior Member
      • Oct 2004
      • 552

      #3
      I put them in a large enclosure intending to try them both ported and low-Q sealed (port plugged). After comparison, I also used them sealed with a sub. Excellent bass for their size.
      Paul

      Comment

      • TacoD
        Super Senior Member
        • Feb 2004
        • 1080

        #4
        Like I said before, the designer of this woofer recommends 22l ported. I hate this kind of discussions, you can try both enclousers. The price of MDF isn't that high.

        Comment

        • gmed
          Senior Member
          • Dec 2006
          • 207

          #5
          Taco, I appreciate you pointing out the PDF file, and it was very helpful, but there is no need for attacking.

          Comment

          • TacoD
            Super Senior Member
            • Feb 2004
            • 1080

            #6
            Sorry, but I did want to point out that you have to explore some things for yourself.

            Comment

            • Xmax BR
              Member
              • Jun 2006
              • 43

              #7
              Dears,

              I would like to create a truly DIY hi-end speaker and I had some difficulty choosing the drivers.

              This MID 18W/8531G00 can be considered TOP for a 3-way speaker?


              My idea is to make a 3-way in configuration TMWW and I thought the following components:


              Tweeter - Morel SUPREME130 Offset Dome
              Free support for loudspeaker projects, sourcing OEM speaker building supplies, and passive crossover design. We sell raw speaker drivers (tweeters, woofers, subwoofer, midrange drivers, full range drivers), speaker kits, amplifiers, capacitors, resistors, and inductors.



              Mid - ??????? ops:
              Please, any suggest?


              Woofer - 2 x ScanSpeak 26W/4867T00



              Sorry for my bad English for write, but a read without problem.

              Tks,

              Renato - From Brazil

              Comment

              • TacoD
                Super Senior Member
                • Feb 2004
                • 1080

                #8
                I've used the Morel 110 (the non offset 130) from 1800 Hz and upwards, so a 7" mid is within reach. My experience with the 26W/8867T00 (the 8 ohm version) shows that this driver is also rather flexible, two of them would yield a sensitivity of ~90 dB/W/m (including bafflestep and estimated room gain). I would recommend to use 2X 26W/8867T00 in parallel instead of 2X 26W/4867T00 (parallel or series)

                The 87 dB sensitivity of the 18W/8531G00 would be rather difficult to integrate. Due the bandpass filter in the XO you could yield somewhat more than this, but all in all I think you should look for a more sensitive mid driver. The 18W/4531G00, is more sensitive, however, than the impedance of your speaker could drop below 4 Ohm around the lower cross-over point.

                Comment

                Working...
                Searching...Please wait.
                An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

                Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

                Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
                There are no results that meet this criteria.
                Search Result for "|||"