Zaph's distortion measurements

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Dennis H
    Ultra Senior Member
    • Aug 2002
    • 3798

    Zaph's distortion measurements

    Zaph has updated his page with distortion tests of tweeters and 6.5" woofers. He figured out how to set the scale on his SoundEasy distortion sweeps so you can see K 2-5 now. Personally, I find these kind of sweeps very helpful. SL and Mark's tests are great but they are only at a few frequencies and can hide a lot of sins. Zaph is mounting them on an IB and can sweep well above and below any reasonable XO so you can really see what's going on in that region.

    A surprise to me was how well the Vifa XG18 performed in the midrange. It looks like a very serious candidate for any 3-way system that relieves it of bass duties.

  • Mark K
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2002
    • 388

    #2
    I've been curious about that Vifa as well. It does not look to be a good performer in the excursion limited frequencies below 80 Hz, but does have very good numbers above. Still, I don't want to fork over ~100 to test one 8O

    My measurements generally parallel Zaph's although there are some differences. I realize that it seems more "complete" to do these sweeps. The problem is that they look only at harmonic distortion. IM distortion is in general a better overall marker of distortion. (A gross oversimplification, but generally true.) So what you gain in terms of a continuous sweep you lose in not being able to assess IM and distortion product number.

    You can actually do IM sweeps by tracking a specific IM product and sweeping. I've been fooling around with this and, beleive or not, John Risch's nonlinear distortion tests, but I'm not really ready to post anything yet.
    www.audioheuristics.org

    Comment

    • capslock
      Senior Member
      • Dec 2004
      • 410

      #3
      The Vifa seems to have a problem with the surround at high excursion, strange as it may sound (double roll shold be better but isn't really). Does John Krutke state the absolute SPL anywhere? 40 to 50 dB midrange separation seem too good to be true for average drivers...

      Comment

      • Dennis H
        Ultra Senior Member
        • Aug 2002
        • 3798

        #4
        He says 0dB is 98dB SPL at 1/2 meter.

        Comment

        • AJINFLA
          Senior Member
          • Mar 2005
          • 681

          #5
          and, beleive or not, John Risch's nonlinear distortion tests
          as long as this doesn't require you to put sandbags on your praxis computer, I'm looking forward to it .

          Cheers,

          AJ
          Manufacturer

          Comment

          • Tommythecat
            Member
            • Nov 2005
            • 72

            #6
            Mark, I thought those XG's were only 62 bucks at Madisound (am I tempting you yet? :twisted: ). And for a forum where every other design contemplates using Milleniums and Excel mids....I'm just happy some people are helping us budget restricted members :T . (As my first post, I feel obligated to suck up to someone. So thanks Jon, Mark, Dennis, Graham, and others you're made my lurking very enjoyable but now I must post)

            Comment

            • Dennis H
              Ultra Senior Member
              • Aug 2002
              • 3798

              #7
              The problem is that they look only at harmonic distortion. IM distortion is in general a better overall marker of distortion. (A gross oversimplification, but generally true.) So what you gain in terms of a continuous sweep you lose in not being able to assess IM and distortion product number.
              No measurement is perfect but Zaph claims, and it makes sense to me, that a driver with high IM distortion will usually show high levels of the higher harmonics as well.

              Comment

              • KeithM
                Senior Member
                • Oct 2005
                • 285

                #8
                There is the XG18 and the XT18 . The XTs are the 100 dollar ones. Zaph tested the XG(62 bucks).

                Comment

                Working...
                Searching...Please wait.
                An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

                Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

                Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
                There are no results that meet this criteria.
                Search Result for "|||"