Box size constant, shorter port...

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Bent
    Super Senior Member
    • Sep 2003
    • 1570

    Box size constant, shorter port...

    No, I'm not re-porting my Heretic,
    But I don't think a post somewhere else is correct so I wanted confirmation.

    If a speaker box (enclosure) volume reamains constant, and port diameter remains constant, and I shorten the port length - will my tuning frequency go up or down? (I've always thought it would go down, but I haven't run the numbers).
  • JonMarsh
    Mad Max Moderator
    • Aug 2000
    • 15298

    #2
    Shorter port means the tuning freqeuncy goes up. Less airmass in the port volume.

    Think of blowing across the mouth of a bottle- large bottles, low notes. Small bottles, higher notes.

    ~Jon
    the AudioWorx
    Natalie P
    M8ta
    Modula Neo DCC
    Modula MT XE
    Modula Xtreme
    Isiris
    Wavecor Ardent

    SMJ
    Minerva Monitor
    Calliope
    Ardent D

    In Development...
    Isiris Mk II updates- in final test stage!
    Obi-Wan
    Saint-Saƫns Symphonique/AKA SMJ-40
    Modula PWB
    Calliope CC Supreme
    Natalie P Ultra
    Natalie P Supreme
    Janus BP1 Sub


    Resistance is not futile, it is Volts divided by Amperes...
    Just ask Mr. Ohm....

    Comment

    • Bent
      Super Senior Member
      • Sep 2003
      • 1570

      #3
      Oh well, at least I still no the difference between a hot and a neutral.
      (some day I'll get my head around this concept)

      Comment

      • Davey
        Senior Member
        • Jan 2003
        • 355

        #4
        Most all of the bottles are the same size now, but awhile back I tended to prefer the low tuning frequency of Corona and XXequis vice the higher frequencies of Bud, Miller, etc. Of course, with enough testing the port length that you're looking to "target" doesn't really matter.

        Cheers,

        Davey.

        Comment

        • cjd
          Ultra Senior Member
          • Dec 2004
          • 5570

          #5
          Originally posted by Davey
          Most all of the bottles are the same size now, but awhile back I tended to prefer the low tuning frequency of Corona and XXequis vice the higher frequencies of Bud, Miller, etc. Of course, with enough testing the port length that you're looking to "target" doesn't really matter.

          Cheers,

          Davey.
          You really should hear the 5L wine bottle I have. Well, once we empty it (done two others though). Banfi Col di Sasso. Excellent stuff. Italian wine from around Tuscany.

          C
          diVine Sound - my DIY speaker designs at diVine Audio

          Comment

          • joecarrow
            Senior Member
            • Apr 2005
            • 753

            #6
            Port diameter?

            What about increasing port diameter? It seems like that should increase air mass in the port and decrease the tuning frequency, but WinISD clearly shows the opposite effect when you change the port diameter.

            By the way- speaking of old Klipsch speakers, the shop two blocks from me just got a pair of Klipschorns. I had no idea of their size! :E
            -Joe Carrow

            Comment

            • Brian Bunge
              Super Senior Member
              • Nov 2001
              • 1389

              #7
              For the same length port, a larger diameter will give a higher tuning frequency. In other words, the larger the diameter of the port, the longer it must be for a given tuning frequency.

              Comment

              • cjd
                Ultra Senior Member
                • Dec 2004
                • 5570

                #8
                Originally posted by joecarrow
                By the way- speaking of old Klipsch speakers, the shop two blocks from me just got a pair of Klipschorns. I had no idea of their size! :E
                Very interesting sound if you get to listen to 'em. Depends what vintage they are too, for that matter.

                C
                diVine Sound - my DIY speaker designs at diVine Audio

                Comment

                • joecarrow
                  Senior Member
                  • Apr 2005
                  • 753

                  #9
                  Originally posted by JonMarsh
                  Shorter port means the tuning freqeuncy goes up. Less airmass in the port volume.

                  Think of blowing across the mouth of a bottle- large bottles, low notes. Small bottles, higher notes.

                  ~Jon
                  Originally posted by Brian Bunge
                  For the same length port, a larger diameter will give a higher tuning frequency. In other words, the larger the diameter of the port, the longer it must be for a given tuning frequency.

                  I'm confused- why does a larger diameter port for the same length and box volume give a higher tuning frequency? For the sake of this discussion, the port volume doesn't count toward box volume- the port is external to the box.

                  Larger diameter seems as though it should provide a larger mass of air in the port and decrease tuning frequency- what's conteracting that? Is it decreased resistance to motion of the air in the port?

                  Thanks in advance!
                  -Joe Carrow

                  Comment

                  • Dennis H
                    Ultra Senior Member
                    • Aug 2002
                    • 3798

                    #10
                    Yeah, think of box volume as the spring and air resistance through the port as the mass. Bigger port area gives less resistance so you have to balance it with longer port length.

                    Comment

                    • Feyz
                      Member
                      • Mar 2005
                      • 99

                      #11
                      From Mr. Leach's Intro. to Electroacoustics book

                      The "mass" that moves in the port is an "acoustic mass" under the scope of ported box frequency response behaviour. The regular mass m, the mechanical one, is defined by the relationship of force and accelaration (or velocity) which is:

                      F = m x a = m x dv/dt, where a is acceleration, v is velocity and dv/dt is rate of change of velocity with respect to time

                      Acoustic mass, call it MA, on the other hand is defined by the relationship between pressure change and "volume velocity", call it U, and given by:

                      P = MA x dU/dt, dU/dt being volume velocity's derivative with respect to time.

                      Volume velocity U is the rate of change of displaced volume with respect to time. For a port, volume velocity U is equal to the volume of air that goes in to (or leaves out of, which is equal) the port, which is given by the equation:

                      U = pi x r^2 x v, where pi is 3.14..., ^2 means to the power 2, v is velocity of air in the port. IOW, U = S x v, where S is cross section area of the port.

                      Pressure change between the open ends of the port is equal to net force applied to the mechanical air mass inside the port divided by cross section area:

                      P = [F / (pi x r^2)]
                      = (m x dv/dt) / (pi x r^2)

                      Since v = U/ (pi x r^2), dv/dt = (1/(pi x r^2)) x dU/dt


                      Then P = [m/(pi x r^2)^2] x dU/dt

                      This means MA, the acoustic mass is equal to m/((pi x r^2)^2)
                      , or m/(S^2)

                      Since m = density x volume = density x length x pi x r^2, where length is length of port,

                      MA = density x length / (pi x r^2)

                      Which says that acoustic mass increases with increased length of port and decreases with radius of port.

                      Something like that anyways....

                      Comment

                      • joecarrow
                        Senior Member
                        • Apr 2005
                        • 753

                        #12
                        Thanks, guys! It's all clear now.
                        -Joe Carrow

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        Searching...Please wait.
                        An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

                        Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                        An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

                        Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                        An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
                        There are no results that meet this criteria.
                        Search Result for "|||"