|
|
#1 (1) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
Posts: 1,828
|
It's time for a Statement announcing my latest project..
Notice pricing has increased for all the designs in this section of the forum. People should use the BOM's and check with suppliers for current prices
The Statements are a ported W-M/T/M-W design based on Dayton RS225 woofers, Tangband W4-1337S Titanium mids and a Fountek NeoCD3.0 ribbon tweeter. The mids are an open backed transmission line design. The Statements project is a collaborative design with Jim Holtz, Curt Campbell and Wayne Wendel as it's creators. Curt has the design documented on his webpage http://speakerdesignworks.com/ Larger pdf versions of the graphics are available here http://www.speakerdesignworks.com/Statementsautocadlayout.pdf Sealed Statements Cabinet PDF Updated BOM( 1-1-2010 ) Links to builder's photo gallery pages http://picasaweb.google.com/tpremo5...ments_Web_Album Last edited by Jim Holtz : 01-09-2010 at 05:03 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (2) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Ocala, FL
Posts: 191
|
Jim,
When do we get to see all the gory details? The crossover, enclosure design, etc... |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (3) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
Posts: 1,828
|
Quote:
They're hot off the presses so to speak and the design information hasn't been put into a form for posting yet. Curt is going to post the design on his website http://www.geocities.com/cc00541/index.html when everything is finalized. Sorry for the enticement without all the details but they will be forthcoming. Jim |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (4) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Ocala, FL
Posts: 191
|
Quote:
That is the best way to do it, whip us into a froth then let 'er rip. Thanks very much for sharing with us. Looks like a very, very interesting project. One I am sure I will be building in the near future.! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (5) |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Southern Arizona
Posts: 86
|
Perfect!
I've really enjoyed my WMTMW Dynaudios but would like to see if I can build something better. This looks like just the ticket. Thanks Jim |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (6) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 439
|
Wow!
These would work great as a pair of high end bedroom-HT speakers! Do you know how much space is needed behind them due to the open mids? Any estimate on total cost? |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (7) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
Posts: 1,828
|
Quote:
Hi Jonaz, Finally, questions I can answer. Curt designed them to work 1 1/2 - 2 feet from the back wall. I'm sure more would be better but that is a limitation in my listening room that I have to live with. Actual cabinet foot print is 11 1/2" W x 16" D x 55" T with a 3" tall base and 2 1/4" tall spikes. Total height is right at 5'. That equals 101 liters for the RS225's. Hopefully, we can get the details put together over the next week for posting. HTH Jim |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (8) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
Posts: 1,828
|
Link added...
I added an additional link to the 1st post which is a further explanation of the effect of the di-pole mid design on the frequency response.
Jim |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (9) |
|
Senior Member
|
Jim, thank you very much!
The combination of W4-1337s and 225's sound interesting, as I'm facing a similar situation, and the RS125's I have don't seem to be the best driver I could use.
__________________
Javier Huerta |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (10) | |
|
Moderator
|
Quote:
Dang Jim, I was hoping to see some cool cabinet pictures- you know me, especially when you mention "open back mid". It will be interesting to see how I fare when I get around to the M10ta, for which the (currently) first tirals will be with the 1337S and NeoCD2. Looks like Curt's got a pretty nice BBC dip engineered in there. Bet you can't wait to hear them! ~Jon
__________________
the AudioWorx _______________________________ Modula MT M8ta Modula Neo D CC Ardent Modula MT MkII coming in 2010.... Modula MTWW Modula TMWW Xtreme Ardent CCX (Compact Center Xtreme) Ardent Cxi (tower, updated design) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (11) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
Posts: 1,828
|
Quote:
Jon, Just for you, here's a construction picture. Curt explained the large BBC curve in this post. http://www.pesupport.com/cgi-bin/config.pl?read=350722 It's due to the way he measured and the di-pole effect on the measurements. I'm not a crossover guy so I can't comment further but it does appear that di-pole mixed with monopole does increase design complexity. Yes, I can't wait to hear them! Tomorrows the day. After extensive listening, it'll be time to make the cabinets pretty. Jim |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (12) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Charlotte, North Carolina
Posts: 671
|
Sweet design Jim. Looking forward to your thoughts and the final design being posted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (13) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bremerton, Washington
Posts: 327
|
Open mids? I guess I'm not seeing it in the photo. Those long tunnels don't have backs?
Cheers, Davey. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (14) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
Posts: 1,828
|
Quote:
Correct. This is not your typical open back or di-pole design where it is open everywhere but the baffle. That type of speaker just doesn't fit my lifestyle or listening room. The goal with the open back/transmission line or what ever you want to call it was simply to open up the mids and give it a bit more spacious sound with out the requirement of placement far away from the walls. It does seem that even with just the back of the cabinet being open, it does have the 4.8 db increase from the rear wave. Jim |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (15) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: latitude 40.8510 longitude -96.7592 altitude 362 meters
Posts: 451
|
These started out a Tline mid design, with the idea that the lines would be stuffed. However, in listening to them I was more enamored with them when the lines were merely lined. Stuffing just took all of the life out of them. Then came to listen to the first iteration of the crossover, and -Whoops! Where'd all that extra midrange energy come from?
I'll try to get some addtional plots and networks posted tonight, and I'm very interested in hearing Jim's impressions tomorrow. C |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 (16) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bremerton, Washington
Posts: 327
|
I think it's a stretch to label those "dipole," but, okay.
Also, what does it mean that an open back speaker or dipole "doesn't fit my lifestyle or listening room?" Davey. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 (17) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
Posts: 1,828
|
Quote:
Davey, LOL! I think we've discussed this before so I'm not going down that road. My comment wasn't meant in a disparaging way at all. I simply can't have speakers 3' from the sidewalls and 4'-6' from the back wall with nothing in between like my big screen TV. It simply doesn't work for me. I have just as big of priority on home theater as I do music and my standards for home theater are very, very high. Dynamics that scare you are a requirement. Not many speaker designs that also excel on music have that ability. Jim |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 (18) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: latitude 40.8510 longitude -96.7592 altitude 362 meters
Posts: 451
|
I don't think anyone here is calling them dipoles, but they do exhibit at least one dipole-like attribute: They have a gain of roughly 4.8 dB on axis over a monopole design.
The mid enclosures could more accurately be described as an unstuffed transmission line with a taper of 1. In this application, the acoustic resistance of the line and foam lining of the walls will affect an acoustic low pass filter, modifying the rear response and resultant radiation pattern. Standing waves will be also effect the rear acoustic response. Certainly the radiation pattern will be closer to cardioid rather than dipolar. It seems to me that in this instance, the dispersion pattern comes closer to correlating with a monopole woofer and tweeter than a true dipole mid would. C |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 (19) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bremerton, Washington
Posts: 327
|
Quote:
Mine do. And they're full dipoles (No, not the ones in my avatar. Those are for music only.) Davey. Last edited by Davey : 05-04-2007 at 04:26 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 (20) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 282
|
Jim, how do you do it man?
Where on earth do you have room for all these speakers? I saw your entries at last year's Iowa DIY, then your avatars... now these beautiful monstrosities. How do you do it, man? What's your secret? I've only got a couple of projects around, and already my family and [future] in-laws are asking, "Where are you going to put all these speakers?"
I don't have much of an answer except, "I dunno. YOu want a pair?" |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 (21) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 294
|
Quote:
So do my Isiris Juniors. Craig |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 (22) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
Posts: 1,828
|
Quote:
Oh sure! You had to bring that up! (ahem) My speaker inventory did grow a bit but I have been selling them recently and am actually starting to get low on speakers, by my standards anyway. I still have the Modula M/T's and RS 3-ways for sale but have someone coming to look at them next week for a home theater system. Just remind your future in-laws that speaker building keeps you off the streets and out of the bars. Jim |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 (23) | |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 19
|
Quote:
Doh, don't make me feel guilty about buying the Natalie P's |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 (24) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
Posts: 1,828
|
Quote:
Ha! It's only fair to warn you that my daughter is a brown belt and may "chop" you when you walk in. Just kidding of course. She likes to have new things and knows that I'll build her something else if the Modula's go too. I'm looking forward to getting togeter with you and Ryan. Jim |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 (25) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Mid Michigan
Posts: 557
|
So how do they sound Jim?
The suspense is killing me. |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 (26) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
Posts: 1,828
|
Quote:
Sorry, I didn't mean to keep everyone in suspense. My initial impression is that they are reference quality. However, I want to get the "real" crossovers in place and the speakers wired up with them in my system for a few days before I give a real opinion. I will say that Curt did a spectacular job on the crossover, IMHO. Everything sounds just right! I'm going to be comparing them to my linearrays and the RS 3-ways so the standards will be high. Just a sample of what's to come, the transmission line mids create a really seductive soundstage. Very nice! More to come in a few days.... Jim |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 (27) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 294
|
Jim,
I'm excited about your new design. Please tell us more, daily? Craig |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 (28) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
Posts: 1,828
|
Quote:
Craig, I'm sorry but I don't have much to report today. My wife is on vacation and we spent the day shopping for flowers etc. and working in the yard. We live in the country on a one acre plot that is nearly all landscaped so spring is a very busy time outside. I have the crossovers assembled and almost have the 1st speaker wired up but thats it. I'm anxious to get them in the listening room for some quality listening time too but it's been tough to steal much time away today. Very, very soon I hope. The short time I was at Curt's listening was extremely positive and I'm really looking forward to getting them in my system. Jim |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 (29) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 3,103
|
any updates Jim? Pics?
I've enjoyed WMTMW speakers in the past and wondered if you perceive any advantages of the arrangement from a subjective and objective point of view; especially after comparing it to your WWMTs. |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 (30) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
Posts: 1,828
|
Statements update – Subjective listening results….
I finally was able to spend some quality listening time with the Statements this week. I’ll try and be coherent and not too “flowery” in my descriptions so it’ll make some sense. Just a reminder that these are “my opinions” so YMMV. The Statements are a new open backed speaker design that Curt Campbell and I came up with that is based on (2) RS225 woofers, (2) Tangband W4-1337S mids and a Fountek NeoCD3.0 ribbon tweeter in a W-M/T/M-W configuration. Total driver and crossover cost came in at $713.
Imaging and presentation: Since the Statements are a quasi transmission line/open back/di-pole design or whatever terminology you want to hang on them, there is a lot of rear energy coming out of the mids from the holes I cut. Treble: Cymbals sound like cymbals and the sound of triangles float in the air. Love or hate ribbons but they do a better job of realistically reproducing the highs to my ears than any other type of tweeter. The highs are open and airy with great horizontal off axis dispersion. Mid range: Here’s where the Statements really shine. The W4’s are ultra clear and detailed. It’s almost eerie when you first listen to them. My line arrays have been the most detailed speakers I‘ve ever heard until now. The Statements are now are my new standard. The W4 Titanium cones simply allow you to hear every nuance in the recording. Everything from the performer licking their lips to shifts in where they’re standing are audible. Obviously it takes really good recordings to hear these things but the Statements are up to the task. Tonal balance is exceptional. Very, very real sounding to my ears. Some of the thoughts that crossed my mind as I listened were smooth and refined sounding but huge amounts of detail. Vocals: WOW! Vocals are simply stunning! Both male and female vocals are super smooth and textured with perfect tonality to my ears. I think Curt used the word seductive describing vocals and I agree completely. Dynamics: This was a huge surprise to me. I’ve been spoiled with the dynamics of my line arrays and have had doubts that a point source speaker could ever come close to the level they provide. The Statements are so darn close in this regard that I don’t feel anything is missing. It is another WOW experience. Bass: The bass capability of dual RS225’s in a well tuned ported enclosure are well known. Very deep, tight bass that is extremely clean. F3 came out about 30 Hz so there is nothing missing in the music I listen to. If you’re in to pipe organ a sub might be necessary, but other than that, bass is abundant and the kind of clean tight bass that allows you to hear the string vibrations of an acoustic bass, yet still have enough kick down low to feel the bass hit your chest when appropriate. Summary: If you’re in love with detail and realism like I am, the Statements fill the bill. People have been asking how I compared them to the RS 3-ways. IMHO, the Statements are your next project. A few words about the crossover and crossover designer The best drivers in the world will sound like crap with a poor crossover and the poorest drivers can sound quite nice with a good crossover. This is where Curt worked his magic. The W-M/T/M-W open back design turned out to be challenging and the transition from a 4” mid to an 8” woofer also complicated things a bit it seems. However, Curt over came the obstacles and did an absolute superb job of selecting the right slopes and crossover points to blend the drivers seamlessly. The sound is smooth and coherent but still offering just the right amount of “bite” when it should be there. This is a very, very musical speaker, to use that terminology, but never lacking in detail or clarity. Wayne Wendell with his extremely sharp ears, became the official voicing expert on the project. You’ve probably figured out that I like the Statements a lot. It’s a large (tall) speaker but not hard to build and the sound quality is very special, IMHO. Like I said in the beginning, these are my opinions so YMMV. You can rest assured that the Statements will get thoroughly vetted at a DIY event or two before the year is over. That’ll either validate my comments or prove I’m deaf. Jim |
|
|
|
|
|
#31 (31) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Ocala, FL
Posts: 191
|
Fantastic review! I am very excited to see the details come out regarding this latest design from you and Curt. I have the woofs and mids on hand now, just need the tweets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 (32) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 3,342
|
Jim, very cool. People like you are constantly making me rethink what I'm going to build next. Thanks.
I see in your post that you have them pulled away from the walls. How/if does the sound change if you move them back closer to the rear wall, like where your line arrays are? I'm thinking about the magic from that open back. |
|
|
|
|
|
#33 (33) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,884
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 (34) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
Posts: 1,828
|
Quote:
Hi Ryan, Yep, I try to promote "speaker building addiction" every chance I get. They're sitting about 30" from the back wall due to all of the other "stuff" behind them. However, Curt designed them to be used 1 1/2' - 2' from the back wall. Curt does have a large heavy ornamental blanket hung behind where the speakers sit in his development room which probably influences the image somewhat. The image sounds the same in my room as it did Curt's. They're very flexible placement wise which was one of my prime criteria when we started the development process. I wish I could bring them out further but it just doesn't work in my room. Jim |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 (35) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,884
|
When you say 1.5-2' from the wall, is that the baffle, or the back of the speaker?
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
|
|